This conversation analytic study identifies a sequential pattern, where the construction of laughable is succeeded by joint laughter between students and supervisors, and is used to anticipate the exposure of trouble and advice-giving. Drawing from authentic supervision meetings in UK institutions, this study identifies key features that appeal joint laughter: (1) students’ disaligment with formal supervisory questions and (2) supervisors’ disruption of students’ consistency of talk to point out something problematic. Both warranting further unpacking, these two types of interactional trouble make the activity of advice-giving relevant. This study not only contributes to the properties of laughable, but also to the sequential environmental prerequisites for advice-giving in supervision interaction.
BeachW (1993) Transitional regularities for ‘casual’ “Okay” usages. Journal of Pragmatics19: 325–352.
2.
BeachWAPrickettE (2017) Laughter, humor, and cancer: Delicate moments and poignant interactional circumstances. Health Communication32(7): 791−802.
3.
BowkerD (2012) ‘Okay? Yeah? Right?’ Negotiating understanding and agreement in master’s supervision meetings with international students. PhD Thesis, Stirling: University of Stirling.
4.
Chentsova-DuttonYE (2012) Butting in vs. being a friend: Cultural differences and similarities in the evaluation of imposed social support. Journal of Social Psychology152: 493–509.
5.
CurlTSDrewP (2008) Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Action41(2): 129–153.
6.
DrewP (2013) Turn design. In: SidnellJStiversT (eds) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, p.131.
7.
DrewP (2018) Epistemics in social interaction. Discourse Studies20(1): 163–187.
8.
EldenC (2023) Jocular self-deprecation in Japanese initial interactions. Journal of Pragmatics218: 45–61.
9.
FitzsimonsGJLehmannDR (2004) Reactance to recommendations: When unsolicited advice yields contrary responses. Marketing Science23(1): 82–94.
10.
GlennP (1995) Laughing at and laughing with: Negotiating participants’ alignments through conversational laughter. In: ten HavePPsathasG (eds) Situated Order: Studies in the Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities. Washington DC, USA: University Press of America, pp. 43–56.
11.
GoffmanE (1955) On face-work. Psychiatry18(3): 213–231.
12.
GoldsmithDJ (2000) Soliciting advice: The role of sequential placement in mitigating face threat. Communications Monographs67: 1–19.
13.
HaakanaM (2001) Laughter as a patient’s resource: Dealing with delicate aspects of medical interaction. Text & Talk21(1–2): 187–219.
14.
HaakanaM (2002) Laughter in medical interaction: From quantification to analysis, and back. Journal of Sociolinguistics6(2): 207–235.
15.
HakaanaM (2010) Laughter and smiling: Notes on co-occurrences. Journal of Pragmatics42(6): 1499–1512.
16.
HayJ (2001) The pragmatics of humor support. Humor14(1): 55–82.
HenricsonSNelsonM (2017) Giving and receiving advice in higher education. Comparing Sweden-Swedish and Finland-Swedish supervision meetings. Journal of Pragmatics109(2021): 105–120.
19.
HeritageJ (1989) Current developments in conversation analysis. In: RogerDBullP (eds) Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters, pp.21–47.
20.
HeritageJ (2013) Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds. Discourse Studies15(5): 551–578.
21.
HeritageJSefiS (1992) Dilemmas of advice. In: DrewPHeritageJ (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.359–417.
22.
HoltE (2011) On the nature of “laughables”: Laughter as a response to overdone figurative phrases. Pragmatics21(3): 93−410.
23.
HoltL (2012) Using laugh responses to defuse complaints. Research on Language & Social Interaction45(4): 430–448. DOI: 10.1080/08351813.2012.726886
24.
HutchbyI (1995) Aspects of recipient design in expert advice-giving on call-in radio. Discourse Processes19: 219–219.
25.
JeffersonG (1979) A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In: PsathasG (ed.) Everyday Language. Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, pp.79–96.
26.
JeffersonG (1984) On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In: AtkinsonJMHeritageJ (eds) Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.358–367.
27.
JeffersonG (1986) Notes on ‘latency’ in overlap onset. Human Studies9: 153–183.
28.
JeffersonG (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In: LernerGH (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.13–31.
29.
JeffersonG (2015) Talking About Troubles in Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
JeffersonGSacksHSchegloffEA (1987) Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. In: ButtonGLeeJRE (eds) Talk and Social Organization. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp.152–205.
31.
JianZ (2022) Expressing trouble in conversation: An interactional challenge and an achievement in student supervision. Dissertation, York: University of York.
32.
JianZ (2024) Responsive advice-giving to troubles in supervision interaction. Discourse Studies26(2): 218–241.
33.
JinYKimYCarlinAP (2022) Co-topical small talk: Troubles-telling in traditional Chinese medical encounters. Applied Linguistics43(3): 493–516.
34.
KangasharjuHNikkoT (2009) Emotions in organizations: Joint laughter in workplace meetings. The Journal of Business Communication (1973)46(1): 100–119.
35.
KeevallikLHofstetterELöfgrenA, et al. (2024) Repetition for real-time coordination of action: Lexical and non-lexical vocalizations in collaborative time management. Discourse Studies. Epub ahead of print 23February2024. DOI:10.1177/14614456231224079.
36.
LernerG (2013) On the place of hesitating in delicate formulations: A turn constructional infrastructure for collaborative indiscretion. In: HayashiMRaymondGSidnellJ (eds) Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.95–134.
37.
LevinsonSC (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
LevinsonSC (1987) Pragmatics and the Grammar of Anaphora: A Partial Pragmatic Reduction of Binding and Control phenomena1. Journal of Linguistics23(2): 379–434.
39.
LiSSealeC (2007) Managing criticism in Ph.D. supervision: A qualitative case study. Studies in Higher Education33(4): 511–526.
40.
LocherMAHoffmanS (2006) The emergence of the identity of a fictional expert advice-giver in an American Internet advice column. Text and Talk26: 67–104.
41.
LooneySDKimJ (2019) Managing disaligning responses: Sequence and embodiment in third-turn teases. In: HallJKLooneySD (eds) The Embodied Work of Teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp.57–80.
42.
MacqueenSCollinsLBrookesG, et al. (2024) Laughter in hospital emergency departments. Discourse Studies. Epub ahead of print 4March2024. DOI:10.1177/14614456231194845.
43.
MallettJA’hernR (1996) Comparative distribution and use of humour within nurse-patient communication. International Journal of Nursing Studies33(5): 530–550.
MuntiglPHorvathAOBänninger-HuberE, et al. (2019) Responding to self-criticism in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research30(6): 800–814. DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2019.1686191
46.
NguyenTBN (2016) Pedagogical practices in PhD supervision meetings from a conversation analytic perspective. PhD Thesis. Queensland: The University of Queensland.
47.
ParkI (2014) Stepwise advice negotiation in writing center peer tutoring. Language and Education28(4): 362–382.
48.
PotterJHepburnA (2010) Putting aspiration into words: ‘Laugh particles’, managing descriptive trouble and modulating action. Journal of Pragmatics42(6): 1543–1555.
49.
Piirainen-MarshA (2011) Irony and the moral order of secondary school classrooms. Linguistics and Education22(4): 364–382.
50.
RaclawJFordCE (2017) Laughter and the management of divergent positions in peer review interactions. Journal of Pragmatics113: 1–15.
51.
RaganSL (1990) Verbal play and multiple goals in the gynaecological exam interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology9(1−2): 67−84.
52.
RomaniukT (2013) Interviewee laughter and disaffiliation in broadcast news interviews. In: GlennPHoltE (eds) Studies of Laughter in Interaction. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 201–220.
53.
SacksH (1992) Lectures on Conversation, vol 1 and 2. Oxford: Blackwell.
54.
SacksHSchegloffEAJeffersonG (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. In: SchenkeinJ (ed) Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York: Academic Press INC, pp.7−55.
55.
SchegloffEA (1996) Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In: OchsESchegloffEAThompsonSA (eds) Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 52–133.
56.
SchegloffEA (2003) The surfacing of the suppressed. In: GlennPJLeBaronCDMandelbaumJ (eds) Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In Honor of Robert Hopper. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 241–262.
57.
SeedhouseP (2005) Conversation analysis as research methodology. In: RichardsKSeedhouseP (eds) Applying Conversation Analysis. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 251–266. DOI: 10.1057/9780230287853_15
58.
ShawCHepburnAPotterJ (2013) Having the last laugh: On post-completion laughter particles. Studies of Laughter in Interaction91–106.
59.
SidnellJStiversT (eds) (2012) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
60.
SilvermanD (1997) Discourses of counselling: HIV counselling as social interaction. London: Sage.
61.
SpeerSA (2019) Reconsidering self-deprecation as a communication practice. British Journal of Social Psychology58(4): 806–828.
62.
StiversT (2004) “No no no” and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human Communication Research30(2): 260–293.
63.
StiversT (2005) Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position. Research on Language and Social Interaction38(2): 131–158.
64.
StiversT (2008) Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction41(1): 31–57.
65.
StiversTHayashiM (2010) Transformative answers: One way to resist a question’s constraints. Language in Society39(1): 1–25.
66.
StiversTMondadaLSteensigJ (eds) (2011) The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, vol. 29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67.
StiversTSidnellJ (eds) (2012) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.
68.
SwolLMVMacGeorgeELPrahlA (2017) Advise with permission?: The effects of advice solicitation on advice outcomes. Communication Studies68(4): 476–492.
69.
TaBT (2022) Giving advice through telling hypothetical stories in doctoral supervision meetings. In: FilipiATaBTTheobaldM (eds) Storytelling Practices in Home and Educational Contexts. Singapore: Springer, pp .311–334.
70.
TaBTFilipiA (2020) Storytelling as a resource for pursuing understanding and agreement in doctoral research supervision meetings. Journal of Pragmatics165: 4–17.
71.
VehviläinenS (1999) Structures of counselling interaction. A conversation analytic study of counselling encounters in career guidance training. Dissertation. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Education.
72.
VehviläinenS (2001) Counsellors’ responses to students’ troubles-talk in counselling encounters in Finnish career guidance training. In: SeltzerMOlesenSPRostilaI (eds) Listening to the Welfare State. London: Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 138–180.
73.
VehviläinenS (2009a) Problems in the research problem: Critical feedback and resistance in academic supervision. Scandinavian Journal of Education Research53(2): 185–203.
74.
VehviläinenS (2009b) Student-initiated advice in academic supervision. Research on Language and Social Interaction42(2): 163–190.
75.
VögeM (2010) Local identity processes in business meetings displayed through laughter in complaint sequences. Journal of Pragmatics42: 1556–1576.
76.
Warner-GarciaS (2014) Laughing when nothing’s funny: The pragmatic use of coping laughter in the negotiation of conversational disagreement. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)24(1): 157–180.
77.
WestC (1984) Routine Complications. Troubles with Talk between Doctors and Patients. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
78.
WestM (2021) ‘I’m not going to tell you cos you need to think about this’: A conversation analysis study of managing advice resistance and supporting autonomy in undergraduate supervision. Postdigital Science and Education3(1): 198–222.
