This article reviews the development of the framing perspective on social movements since its emergence over three decades ago. The review led to three conclusions. During this period, the impact of the perspective has increased, its conceptual development has continued, and the types of the studies have shown major changes and continuities. For example, the initial predominance of descriptive and static studies has changed with the development of a significant number of explanatory studies on both framing and frame transformations, as well as on the consequences of their characteristics for the social movement. However, studies on frame structure or the emotions they evoke are still rare.
AhmedRPisoiuD (2021) Uniting the far right: How the far-right extremist, New Right, and populist frames overlap on Twitter: A German case study. European Societies23(2): 232–254.
2.
AmmaturoFR (2020) Framing and shaming: LGBT activism, feminism and the construction of ‘gestational surrogacy’ in Italy. Social Movement Studies19(4): 447–463.
3.
BailCA (2012) The fringe effect: Civil society organizations and the evolution of media discourse about Islam since the September 11th attacks. American Sociological Review77(6): 855–879.
4.
BarrancoOMolinaO (2021) Continuity and change in trade union frames: Evidence from general strikes in Spain. Economic and Industrial Democracy42(4): 1232–1253.
5.
BarrancoOParcerisaL (2020) Yes, it is possible! Framing processes and social resonance of Spain’s anti-eviction movement. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies12(1): 37–57.
6.
BenfordRD (1993) Frame disputes within the nuclear disarmament movement. Social Forces71: 677–701.
7.
BenfordRD (1997) An insider’s critique of the social movement framing perspective. Sociological Inquiry67(4): 409–430.
8.
BenfordRD (2014) The Framing Perspective’s Development, Diffusion, and Resonance. Mobilization: An International Quarterly19(1): 23–46.
9.
BenfordRDSnowDA (2000) Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology26: 611–639.
10.
BloemraadISilvaFVossK (2016) Rights, economics, or family? Frame resonance, political ideology, and the immigrant rights movement. Social Forces94(4): 1647–1674.
11.
Blum-KulkaSLiebesT (1993) Frame ambiguities: Intifada Narrativization of the experience by Israeli soldiers. In: CohenAAWolsfeldG (eds) Framing the Intifada: People and Media. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing, pp. 27–52.
12.
BrayLAShriverTEAdamsAE (2019) Framing authoritarian legitimacy: elite cohesion in the aftermath of popular rebellion. Social Movement Studies18(6): 682–701.
13.
BuyukozturkBGauldenSDowd-ArrowB (2018) Contestation on Reddit, Gamergate, and movement barriers. Social Movement Studies17(5): 592–609.
14.
Della PortaD (2022) From another Europe to beyond Europe? Visions of Europe in movements. Social Movement Studies21(1–2): 180–198.
15.
Espinoza-KulickA (2019) A multimethod appoach to framing disputes: same-sex marriage on trial in Obergefell v. Hodges. Mobilization: An International Quarterly25(1): 45–70.
16.
FerreeM (2003) Resonance and radicalism: Feminist framing in the abortion debates of the United States and Germany. American Journal of Sociology109(2): 304–344.
17.
GamsonWAFiremaBRytinaS (1982) Encounters With Unjust Authority. Homewood, AL: Dorsey.
18.
GerhardsJRuchtD (1992) Mesomobilization: Organizing and framing in two protest campaigns in West Germany. American Journal of Sociology98: 555–596.
19.
GitlinT (1980) The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media and the Making and Unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
20.
GoffmanE (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper & Row.
21.
HewittLFitzgeraldS (2014) New Directions for Framing Research. Mobilization: An International Quarterly19(1): 23–46.
22.
JohnstonH (1995) A methodology for frame analysis: From discourse to cognitive schemata. In: JohnstonHKlandermansB (eds) Social Movements and Culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 217–246.
23.
JohnstonH (2002) Verification and proof in frame and discourse analysis. In: KlandermansBTaggenborgSS (eds) Methods of Social Movement Research. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 62–91.
24.
JohnstonH (2005) Comparative frame analysis. In: JohnstonHNoakesJA (eds) Frames of Protest: Social Movements and the Framing Perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 237–260.
25.
JohnstonHAlimiE (2013) A methodology analyzing for frame dynamics: The grammar of keying battles in Palestinian nationalism. Mobilization: An International Quarterly18(4): 453–474.
26.
KetelaarsP (2016) What strikes the responsive chord? The effects of framing qualities on frame resonance among protest participants. Mobilization: An International Quarterly21(3): 341–360.
27.
McCammonH (2009) Beyond frame resonance: The argumentative structure and persuasive capacity of twentieth-century US women’s jury-rights frames. Mobilization: An International Quarterly14(1): 45–64.
28.
McCammonHJ (2012) Explaining frame variation: More moderate and radical demands for women’s citizenship in the US women’s jury movements. Social Problems59(1): 43–69.
29.
McCammonHJ (2013) Discursive opportunity structure. In: SnowDADella PortaDKlandermansB, et al. (eds) The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 211–212.
30.
McCammonHJ (2014) Recent Directions in Social Movement Framing Research. Mobilization: An International Quarterly19(1): 23–46.
31.
MooreB (1978) Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt. White Plains, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
32.
MorrisonDRIsaacLW (2012) Insurgent images: Genre selection and visual frame amplification in IWW cartoon art. Social Movement Studies11(1): 61–78.
33.
OliverPJohnstonH (2005) What a good idea! Ideologies and frames in social movement research. In: JohnstonHNoakesJA (eds) Frames of Protest: Social Movements and the Framing Perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp.185–204.
34.
OppK-D (2009) Theories of Political Protest and Social Movements. London; New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
SatheeshSBenfordRD (2020) Framing and social movements. In: RitzerGRojekC (eds.) The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, Malden, MA; Oxford; Carlton: Blackwell.
36.
ShriverTEAdamsAECableS (2013) Discursive obstruction and elite opposition to environmental activism in Czech Republic. Social Forces91(3): 873–893.
37.
SnowDTanAOwensP (2013) Social movements, framing processes, and cultural revitalization and fabrication. Mobilization: An International Quarterly18(3): 225–242.
38.
SnowDABenfordRD (1988) Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research1: 197–217.
39.
SnowDABenfordRD (1992) Master frames and cycles of protest. In: MorrisADMuellerCM (eds) Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp.133–155.
40.
SnowDABenfordRD (2005) Clarifying the relationship between framing and ideology. In: JohnstonHNoakesJA (eds) Frames of Protest: Social Movements and the Framing Perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 205–212.
41.
SnowDARochfordEBWordenSK, et al. (1986) Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review51: 464–481.
42.
SnowDAVliegenthartRCorrigall-BrownC (2007) Framing the French ‘Riots’: A comparative study of frame variation. Social Forces86(2): 385–415.
43.
SnowDAVliegenthartRKetelaarsP (2019) The framing perspective on social movements: Its conceptual roots and architecture. In: SnowDASouleSAKriesiH, et al. (eds) The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, pp.392–410.
44.
TeixeiraMAMottaR (2022) Unionism and feminism: Alliance building in the Brazilian Marcha das Margaridas. Social Movement Studies21(1–2): 135–151.
45.
TrumpyAJ (2016) I hate it, but it still sounds good’: Collective identity and the evaluation of oppositional frame resonance. Social Movement Studies15(2): 164–179.
46.
van DijkTA (1997) The study of discourse. In: van Dijk (ed) Discourse as Social Interaction. London; Thousand Oaks, CA; New Delhi: SAGE, pp. 1–34.
47.
van DijkTA (2023) Analyzing frame analysis: A critical review of framing studies in social movement research. Discourse Studies.
48.
WilliamsGIWilliamsRH (1995) All we want is equality: Rhetorical framing in the fathers’ rights movement. In: BestJ (ed) Images of Issues: Typifying Contemporary Social Problems, second edition. New York: Aldine De Gruyter, pp. 191–212.
49.
YukichG (2013) Constructing the model immigrant: Movement strategy and immigrant deservingness in the New Sanctuary Movement. Social Problems60(3): 302–320.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
