This study examines Nǐ yìsi shì X ‘Your Meaning is X’ as a practice of doing other-initiation in Mandarin conversations, focusing on how it addresses different sources of troubles systematically in informing sequences. It is found that while ‘Nǐ yìsi shì’ signals the speaker’s having trouble with the prior informing turn, ‘X’ is deployed to locate different aspects of the trouble source, being shaped by how an informing emerges in talk-in-interaction. Specifically, when following a volunteered informing, ‘X’ is usually built to clarify specific words or phrases in preceding informing, thereby treating a certain element as underspecified or ambiguous. However, when following a question-solicited informing, ‘X’ is typically constructed to work out what the provided information exactly conveys, indicating the whole informing turn/action is in some way problematic, inappropriate, or inapposite. In both cases, ‘Nǐ yìsi shì X’ serves as an OI, working to target different kinds of the trouble source, and simultaneously proposes a potential solution to it.
AlbertSde RuiterJP (2018) Repair: The interface between interaction and cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science10: 279–313.
2.
BarnesS (2016) Aphasia and open format other-initiation of repair: Solving complex trouble in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction49(2): 111–127.
3.
BenjaminT (2012) When problems pass us by: Using “you mean” to help locate the source of trouble. Research on Language and Social Interaction45(1): 82–109.
4.
BoldenGB (2013) Unpacking “self”: Repair and epistemics in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly76(4): 314–342.
5.
ClarkHHSchaeferEF (1987) Collaborating on contributions to conversations. Language and Cognitive Processes12: 19–41.
6.
ClaymanSHeritageJ (2002) The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
CliftR (2016) Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
DrewP (1997) “Open” class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics28: 69–101.
9.
EgbertMM (1996) Context-sensitivity in conversation: Eye gaze and the German repair initiator “bitte?”. Language in Society25: 587–612.
10.
HayashiAHayanoK (2013) Proffering insertable elements: A study of other-initiated repair in Japanese. In: HayashiARaymondGSidnellJ (eds) Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.293–321.
11.
HeritageJ (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12.
JeffersonG (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In: LernerGH (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies From the First Generation. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing, pp.13–31.
13.
JeffersonG (2018) Repairing the Broken Surface of Talk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
KendrickKH (2015) The intersection of turn-taking and repair: The timing of other-initiations of repair in conversation. Frontiers in Psychology6: 250.
15.
KitzingerC (2013) Repair. In: SidnellJStiversT (eds) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp.229–280.
16.
PomerantzA (1988) Offering a candidate answer: An information seeking strategy. Communication Monographs55(4): 360–373.
17.
RaymondG (2003) Grammar and social organization: Yes-no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review68: 939–967.
18.
RobinsonJD (2006) Managing trouble responsibility and relationships during conversational repair. Communication Monographs73: 137–161.
19.
RobinsonJD (2013) Epistemics, action formation, and other-initiation of repair: The case of partial questioning repeats. In: HayashiMRaymondGSidnellJ (eds) Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.261–292.
20.
RobinsonJD (2014) What “what?” tells us about how conversationalists manage intersubjectivity. Research on Language and Social Interaction47(2): 109–129.
21.
RobinsonJDKevoe-FeldmanH (2010) Using full repeats to initiate repair on others’ questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction43(3): 232–259.
22.
SacksHSchegloffEAJeffersonG (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50(4): 696–735.
23.
SchegloffEA (1979) The relevance of repair for syntax-for-conversation. In: GivonT (ed.) Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp.261–288.
24.
SchegloffEA (1987) Some sources of misunderstanding in talk-in-interaction. Linguistics25: 201–218.
25.
SchegloffEA (1992) Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology97(5): 1295–1345.
26.
SchegloffEA (1997) Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes23: 499–545.
27.
SchegloffE (2000a) When ‘others’ initiate repair. Applied Linguistics21(2): 205–243.
28.
SchegloffE (2000b) On granularity. Annual Review of Sociology26: 715–720.
29.
SchegloffEA (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
SchegloffEA (2013) Ten operations in self-initiated, same-turn repair. In: HayashiMRaymondGSidnellJ (eds) Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.41–70.
31.
SchegloffEAJeffersonGSacksH (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language53(2): 361–382.
32.
SeltingM (1988) The role of intonation in the organization of repair and problem handling sequences in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics12: 293–322.
33.
SeltingM (1996) Prosody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation: The case of so-called “astonished” questions in repair initiation. In: Couper-KuhlenESeltingM (eds) Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.231–270.
34.
SteensigJDrewP (2008) Introduction: Questioning and affiliation/disaffiliation in interaction. Discourse Studies10: 5–15.
35.
SvennevigJ (2008) Trying the easiest solution first in other-initiation of repair. Journal of Pragmatics40: 333–348.
36.
ThompsonSAFoxBACouper-KuhlenE (2015) Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
YuGDGuoHWuYX (2020) “(ni)/(na) yisi (shi) + X” as the third turn in questioning-answering sequence. Journal of Foreign Languages43(2): 30–38.
38.
ZhangW (1998) Repair in Chinese conversation. Doctoral Thesis, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
