The recurrent court-related mediation discourse studies have focused on mediation participants’ willingness. Drawing on a corpus of five situated recorded court-related civil mediation data in China, this article takes one of the frequently-used mediation resources ‘I don’t want X/Y’ (here X, Y stands for a certain mediation willingness/intention) as a case study of formulating mediation ‘wants’. It is intended to explore mediation participants’ exploitation of the court-related mediation resources to express their mediation willingness/ intentions: how the mediator manipulates either side of the participants’ mediation discursive concepts; how the mediator shift the trajectory of narrating the participants’ mediation dispute-facts to judging on the dispute-facts; and how the mediator deviates himself from the third-party neutral mediators’ mediating role. The value of analyzing this formulation ‘I don’t want X/Y’ is to reveal the fact that such mediation practices in their recurrent environments might go against the court-related mediation principles such as being self-willingness, neutrality and uprightness. This article contributes to formulate mediation ‘wants’ strategically and promote the court-related mediation practices in the service of sequentially unfolding mediation interaction effectively.
BoldenGBRobinsonJD (2011) Soliciting accounts with why-interrogatives in conversation. Journal of Communication61(1): 94–119.
2.
ChengLChenC (2019) The construction of relational frame model in Chinese President Xi Jinping’s foreign visit speeches. Text and Talk39: 149–170.
3.
ChildsC (2012) ‘I’m not X, I just want Y’: Formulating ‘wants’ in interaction. Discourse Studies14(2): 181–196.
4.
CohenJA (1966) Chinese mediation on the eve of modernization. California Law Review54: 1201–1226.
5.
ConleyJO’BarrW (1988) Just Words: Law, Language and Power. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
6.
ChenCY(Trans., 2006). Beijing: Beijing Law Publishing Press.
7.
DelgadoDDunnCBrownP, et al. (1985) Fairness and formality: Minimizing the risk of prejudice in alternative dispute resolution. Wisconsin Law Review1369(12): 1359–1404.
8.
DengY (2012) Strategy to alleviate adversity in Chinese mediation: A discourse analysis on real Chinese mediation sessions. Chinese Journal of Communication5(4): 417–436.
9.
DiamantNJ (2000) Conflict and conflict resolution in China: Beyond mediation centered approaches. Journal of Conflict Resolution44(4): 523–546.
10.
DonohueWAAllenMBurrellN (1985) Communication strategies in mediation. In: LemmonJA (ed.) Evaluative Criteria and Outcome in Mediation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp.75–89.
11.
DuJB (2000) The macrostructure of forensic linguistics: An overview based on current researches. Modern Foreign Languages23(1): 99–107.
12.
EdwardsD (1997) Discourse and Cognition. London: SAGE.
13.
EdwardsD (2006) Facts, norms and dispositions: Practical uses of the modal verb would in police interrogations. Discourse Studies8(4): 475–501.
14.
FisherRUryW (1981) Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
15.
FranzénAAronssonK (2018) ‘then she got a spanking’: Social accountability and narrative versions in social workers’ courtroom testimonies. Discourse Studies20(5): 577–597.
16.
GongB (2009) Discourse analysis of linguistic evidential— an interpretative from perspective of forensic linguistics. Journal of Tianjin Institute of Politics and Law Administration11(1): 45–49.
17.
HuJT (2006) Central government of Chinese communist party’s decisions on important topics such as building a harmonious socialist society. In: The sixth plenum of the 16th CPC central committee [in Chinese], October. Beijing: People’s Publishing House.
18.
JacobsS (2002) Maintaining neutrality in dispute mediation: Managing disagreement while managing not to disagree. Journal of Pragmatics34: 1403–1426.
19.
JanierMReedC (2017) I didn’t say that! Uses of SAY in mediation discourse. Discourse Studies19(6): 619–647.
20.
KeXB (2011) A study of identity construction in procedural mediation discourse. Guangxi Social Science (5): 139.
21.
KeXB (2012a) A study of mediating space construction in Chinese court-related mediation. Hubei Social Science2: 123–127.
22.
KeXB (2012b) A Game-theoretical study of court-related mediation discourse in Chinese. Unpublished dissertation, Central China Normal University.
23.
KeXB (2016) A Game-Theoretical Study of Court-Related Mediation Discourse in Chinese. Wuhan: Central China Normal University Publishing Press.
24.
LewickiPJLitererJ (1985) Negotiation. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
25.
LiaoMZ (2003) A Study of Courtroom Questions, Responses and Their Interaction. Beijing: Law Press.
26.
LubmanS (1967) Mao and mediation: Politics and dispute resolution in Communist China. California Law Review55(5): 1284.
27.
LvWY (2011) A Study of Courtroom Discourse Power. Beijing: China Social Science Publishing Press.
28.
MerrySE (1982) Defining “Success” in the neighborhood justice movement. In: TomasicRFeeleyMM (eds) Neighborhood Justice: Assessment of an Emerging Idea. New York, NY: Longman, pp.172–192.
29.
MillsCW (1940) Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review5(6): 904–913.
30.
MinowM (1987) Forward: Justice engendered. Harvard Law Review101: 75–95.
31.
PotterJ (2005) Making psychology relevant. Discourse & Society16(5): 739–747.
32.
QianGL (2005) Language: The Last Family of Human Beings. Beijing: Beijing Commercial Press.
33.
RaiffaH (1982) The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
34.
ScottMBLymanSM (1968) Accounts. American Sociological Review33(1): 46–62.
35.
SearleJR (1979) Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
ShiG (2012) An analysis of modality in Chinese courtroom discourse. Journal of Multicultural Discourses7(2): 161–178.
37.
StokesRHewittJP (1976) Aligning actions. American Sociological Review41(5): 838–849.
38.
VuchinichS (1984) Sequencing and social structure in family conflict. Social Psychology Quarterly47(3): 217–234.
39.
WallJABlumM (1991) Community mediation in the People’s Republic of China. The Journal of Conflict Resolution35(1): 3–20.
40.
WellmanHM (2010) Developing a theory of mind. In: GoswamiU (ed.) The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development. London: Wiley-Blackwell, pp.258–284.
41.
WilliamsVWebbJDowlingS, et al. (2019) Direct and indirect ways of managing epistemic asymmetries when eliciting memories. Discourse Studies21(2): 199–215.
42.
YouZA (2006) Fundamental principles of mediation language. In: Law, language and language versatilities—essay collections of the ninth international academic conference on law and language (eds WangJ, et al). Beijing: Law Press.
43.
ZubekJMPruittDGPeirceRS, et al. (1992) Disputant and mediator behaviors affecting short-term success in mediation. Journal of Conflict Resolution36(3): 546–572.
