Ever since Charles Goodwin’s seminal works on gaze, there has been a long-standing interest in Conversation Analysis in the interrelationship between talk and bodily conduct in the accomplishment of social action. Recently, a small but emerging body of research has explored the ways in which embodied conduct figures in the organization and operations of repair. In this article, I take up a similar theme and investigate the interaction between talk and iconic gestures in same-turn self-initiated repair in Mandarin conversation. The phenomenon I examine concerns the use of what I call “gestural repair.” The analysis focuses on how such repair can intertwine with talk in multi-stage operations in the progressivity and resolution of repair. The data are drawn from 50 hours of naturally-occurring conversations collected in China. Some unique features of such gestural repair observed in the Mandarin data are also discussed.
DrewP (1997) ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics28: 69–101.
2.
DrewPWalkerTOgdenR (2013) Self-repair and action construction. In:HayashiMRaymondGSidnellJ (eds) Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.71–94.
3.
EgbertM (1996) Context-sensitivity in conversation: Eye gaze and the German repair initiatorbitte? Language in Society25(4): 587–612.
4.
GarfinkelH (1984) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
5.
GoodwinC (1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In:PsathasG (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York, NY: Irvington, pp.97–121.
6.
GoodwinC (1981) Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers. New York, NY: Academic Press.
7.
GoodwinMHGoodwinC (1986) Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotics62(1–2): 51–75.
8.
HauserE (2019) Upgraded self-repeated gestures in Japanese interaction. Journal of Pragmatics150: 180–196.
9.
HayashiM (2003a). Joint Utterance Construction in Japanese Conversation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
10.
HayashiM (2003b) Language and the body as resources for collaborative action: A study of word searches in Japanese conversation. Research and Social Interaction36(2): 109–141.
11.
HayashiM (2005) Joint turn construction through language and the body: Notes on embodiment in coordinated participation in situated activities. Semiotica156(1/4): 21–53.
12.
HayashiMRaymondGSidnellJ (2013) Conversational repair and human understanding: An introduction. In:HayashiMRaymondGSidnellJ (eds) Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–40.
13.
HeritageJ (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. New York, NY: Polity Press.
14.
JeffersonG (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In:LernerGH (ed) Conversation Analysis: Studies From the First Generation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins, pp.13–31.
15.
KendonA (1972) Some relationships between body movement and speech. In:SiegmanAWPopeB (eds) Studies in Dyadic Communication. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press, pp.177–210.
16.
KendonA (1975) Gesticulation, speech and the gesture theory of language origins. Sign Language Studies9: 349–373.
17.
LernerGH (1996) On the ‘semi-permeable’ character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In:OchsESchegloffEAThompsonSA (eds) Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.238–276.
18.
LernerGH (2013) On the place of hesitating in delicate formulations: A turn-constructional infrastructure for collaborative indiscretion. In:HayashiMRaymondGSidnellJ (eds) Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.95–134.
19.
MondadaL (2013) Conversation analysis: Talk and bodily resources for the organization of social interaction. In:MüllerCCienkiAFrickeE, et al. (eds) Body-Language-Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction. Volume 1. Berlin, Germany and Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton, pp.218–226.
20.
MondadaL (2019) Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics145: 47–62.
21.
MortensenK (2016) The body as a resource for other-initiation of repair: Cupping the hand behind the ear. Research on Language and Social Interaction49(1): 34–57.
22.
OlsherD (2008) Gesturally-enhanced repeats in the repair turn: Communication strategy or cognitive language-learning tool? In: McCaffertySGStamG (eds) Gesture: Second Language Acquisition and Classroom Research. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.109–130.
23.
SacksH (1992) Lectures on Conversation, vol. 2 (ed. JeffersonG, with introduction by SchegloffEA). Oxford: Blackwell.
24.
SacksHSchegloffEA (2002[1975]) Home position. Gesture2(2): 133–146.
25.
SchegloffEA (1984) On some gestures’ relation to talk. In: AtkinsonJMHeritageJ (eds) Structure of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.266–296.
26.
SchegloffEA (1992) Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology97: 1295–1345.
27.
SchegloffEA (2013) Ten operations in self-initiated, same-turn repair. In:HayashiMRaymondGSidnellJ (eds) Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.41–70.
28.
SchegloffEAJeffersonGSacksH (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language53(2): 361–382.
29.
SeoM-SKoshikI (2010) A conversation analytic study of gestures that engender repair in ESL conversational tutoring. Journal of Pragmatics42(8): 2219–2239.
30.
SidnellJ (2006) Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language and Social Interaction39(4): 377–409.
