John Swales’ 1986 article ‘Citation analysis and discourse analysis’ was the first to apply citation analysis to describe in-text citations in the field of discourse analysis. Howard White’s 2004 article ‘Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited’ was written by an information scientist and primarily focused on citation analysis and discourse analysis. Here, we cast a wider net by conducting a bibliometric analysis of discourse analysis to sketch its scientific landscape between 1978 and 2018. Our findings show that discourse analysis has emerged as a major, and increasingly distinctively sociological, contribution to the analysis of language in social life. It is evident that discourse analysts are increasingly interested in such topics as corpus linguistics, digital conversation analysis, discursive news values approach, membership categorization analysis, multimodal analysis and social media. It is a general trend that the United States is no longer the only dominating publication powerhouse in the field. Countries such as the United Kingdom, Australia and China are wielding a growing share of research output.
BakerPLevonE (2015)
Picking the right cherries? A comparison of corpus-based and qualitative analyses of news articles about masculinity. Discourse & Communication9(2): 221–236.
2.
BakerPGabrielatosCKhosravinikM, et al. (2008)
A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society19(3): 273–306.
BatemanJA (2019)
Towards critical multimodal discourse analysis: A response to Ledin and Machin. Critical Discourse Studies16(5): 531–539.
5.
BednarekMCapleH (2014)
Why do news values matter? Towards a new methodological framework for analysing news discourse in Critical Discourse Analysis and beyond. Discourse& Society25(2): 135–158.
6.
BednarekMCapleH (2017) The Discourse of News Values: How News Organisations Create Newsworthiness.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
7.
BhatiaV (2010)
Interdiscursivity in professional communication. Discourse & Communication4(1): 32–50.
8.
BhatiaVFlowerdewJJonesRH (2008) Advances in Discourse Studies.
New York:
Routledge.
9.
BickesHOttenTWeymannLC (2014)
The financial crisis in the German and English press: Metaphorical structures in the media coverage on Greece, Spain and Italy. Discourse & Society25(4): 424–445.
10.
BlommaertJ (2005) Discourse: A Critical Introduction.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
11.
BrownGYuleG (1983) Discourse Analysis: Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
12.
BrownPLevinsonS (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
13.
CapleH (2019)
Doing critical discourse studies with multimodality: A reply. Critical Discourse Studies16(5): 522–530.
14.
de BellisN (2009) Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics.
Lanham, MD:
Scarecrow Press.
15.
de BotK (2015) A History of Applied Linguistics: From 1980 to the Present.
New York:
Routledge.
FaircloughN (1989) Language and Power.
London:
Longman.
18.
FaircloughN (1992) Discourse and Social Change.
Cambridge:
Polity Press.
19.
FaircloughN (1995) Media Discourse.
New York:
Arnold.
20.
FaircloughNWodakR (1997) Critical discourse analysis. In: van DijkTA (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction (Vol. 2. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction).
London:
Sage, pp. 258–284.
21.
FitzgeraldR (2012)
Membership categorization analysis: Wild and promiscuous or simply the joy of Sacks?Discourse Studies14(3): 305–311.
22.
FitzgeraldRHousleyW (eds) (2015) Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis.
London:
Sage.
23.
FowlerR (1991) Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press.
London:
Routledge.
24.
GabrielatosCMarchiA (2012) Keyness: Appropriate metrics and practical issues. Paper presented at the CADS International Conference 2012. Corpus-assisted Discourse Studies: More than the sum of Discourse Analysis and Computing, University of Bologna, Italy, 13–14 September.
25.
GeorgakopoulouA (2014)
Small stories transposition and social media: A micro-perspective on the ‘Greek crisis’. Discourse & Society25(4): 519–539.
26.
GilesDStommelWPaulusT, et al. (2015)
Microanalysis of online data: The methodological development of ‘digital CA’. Discourse, Context & Media7: 45–51.
27.
GoffmanE (1981) Forms of Talk.
Philadelphia, PA:
University of Pennsylvania Press.
28.
GoodmanSRoweL (2014)
Maybe it is prejudice … but it is NOT racism: Negotiating racism in discussion forums about Gypsies. Discourse & Society25(1): 32–46.
29.
GraesserASingerMTrabassoT (1994)
Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review101: 371–395.
30.
HallidayMAK (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar.
London:
Edward Arnold.
31.
HanssonS (2015)
Discursive strategies of blame avoidance in government: A framework for analysis. Discourse & Society26(3): 297–322.
HavilandSEClarkHH (1974)
What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior13(5): 512–521.
34.
HousleyWFitzgeraldR (2009)
Membership categorization, culture and norms in action. Discourse & Society20(3): 345–362.
35.
JohnstonJEBerryKJMielkePW (2006)
Measures of effect size for chi-square and likelihood-ratio goodness-of-fit tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills103(2): 412–414.
36.
KhosravinikM (2010)
The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Politics9(1): 1–28.
37.
KintschW (1974) The Representation of Meaning in Memory.
London:
Psychology Press.
38.
KintschWvan DijkTA (1978)
Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review85: 363–394.
39.
KressGVan LeeuwenT (1996) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design.
London:
Routledge.
40.
LedinPMachinD (2019a)
Doing critical discourse studies with multimodality: From metafunctions to materiality. Critical Discourse Studies16(5): 497–513.
41.
LedinPMachinD (2019b)
Final reply. Critical Discourse Studies16(5): 540–548.
42.
LeiLLiaoS (2017)
Publications in linguistics journals from Mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Macau (2003–2012): A bibliometric analysis. Journalof Quantitative Linguistics24: 54–64.
43.
LeiLLiuD (2019a)
The research trends and contributions of System’s publications over the past four decades (1973–2017): A bibliometric analysis. System80: 1–13.
44.
LeiLLiuD (2019b)
Research trends in applied linguistics from 2005 to 2016: A bibliometric analysis and its implications. Applied Linguistics40(3): 540–561.
45.
LevinsonS (1983) Pragmatics.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
46.
LeydesdorffLWagnerC (2009)
Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system. Scientometrics78: 23–36.
47.
LiJLeiLChengL (2020)
Mapping evaluation, appraisal and stance in discourse (2000–2015): A bibliometric analysis. Glottotheory10(1–2): 31–55.
48.
LiaoSLeiL (2017)
What we talk about when we talk about corpus: A bibliometric analysis of corpus-related research in linguistics (2000–2015). Glottometrics38: 1–20.
49.
LiuYO’HalloranKL (2009)
Intersemiotic texture: Analyzing cohesive devices between language and images. Social Semiotics19(4): 367–388.
50.
McKoonGRatcliffR (1992)
Inference during reading. Psychological Review99(3): 440–466.
51.
MallapatyS (2020)
China bans cash rewards for publishing papers. Nature579(7797): 18.
52.
MandlerJMJohnsonNS (1977)
Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology9(1): 111–151.
53.
MoiwoJTaoF (2013)
The changing dynamics in citation index publication position China in a race with the USA for global leadership. Scientometrics95: 1031–1050.
54.
MondadaL (2014)
Instructions in the operating room: How the surgeon directs their assistant’s hands. Discourse Studies16(2): 131–161.
55.
MylonasY (2014)
Crisis, austerity and opposition in mainstream media discourses of Greece. Critical Discourse Studies11(3): 305–321.
56.
NichollsPT (1988)
Price’s square root law: Empirical validity and relation to Lotka’s law. Information Processing & Management24(4): 469–477.
57.
O’HalloranKWignellPTanS (2019) ‘
Doing critical discourse studies with multimodality: from metafunctions to materiality’ by Per Ledin and David Machin. Critical Discourse Studies16(5): 514–521.
58.
PageR (2012)
The linguistics of self-branding and micro-celebrity in Twitter: The role of hashtags. Discourse & Communication6(2): 181–201.
59.
PotterJWetherellM (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour.
London:
Sage.
60.
PriceDJdS (1986) Little Science Big Science, and Beyond.
New York:
Columbia University Press.
61.
QiuJ (2010)
Publish or perish in China. Nature463: 142–143.
62.
RaysonPGarsideR (2000) Comparing corpora using frequency profiling. Paper presented at the Workshop on Comparing Corpora, Hong Kong, 7 October.
63.
SacksHSchegloffEAJeffersonG (1974)
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50: 696–735.
64.
SchegloffE (2007)
A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics39(3): 462–482.
65.
StokoeE (2010) ‘
I’m not gonna hit a lady’: Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men’s denials of violence towards women. Discourse & Society21(1): 59–82.
66.
StokoeE (2012)
Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies14(3): 277–303.
67.
StommelWKooleT (2010)
The online support group as a community: A micro-analysis of the interaction with a new member. Discourse Studies12(3): 357–378.
68.
SwalesJ (1986)
Citation analysis and discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics7(1): 39–56.
69.
ThomdykePW (1977)
Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. CognitivePsychology9: 77–110.
70.
TrabassoTSperryLL (1985)
Causal relatedness and importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language24(5): 595–611.
71.
VaaraE (2014)
Struggles over legitimacy in the Eurozone crisis: Discursive legitimation strategies and their ideological underpinnings. Discourse & Society25(4): 500–518.
72.
van DijkTA (1993)
Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse& Society4(2): 249–283.
73.
van DijkTA (2013)
The field of epistemic discourse analysis. DiscourseStudies15(5): 497–499.
74.
van DijkTAKintschW (1983) Strategies of Discourse Comprehension.
New York:
Academic Press.
75.
van EckNJWaltmanLDekkerR, et al. (2010)
A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology61(12): 2405–2416.
76.
WaltmanLvan EckNJNoyonsECM (2010)
A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics4: 629–635.
WilsonA (2013) Embracing Bayes factors for key item analysis in corpus linguistics. In: BieswangerMKoll-StobbeA (eds) New Approaches to the Study of Linguistic Variability.
Frankfurt:
Peter Lang, pp. 3–11.
79.
WodakRBoukalaS (2015)
European identities and the revival of nationalism in the European Union: A discourse historical approach. Journal of Language and Politics14(1): 87–109.
80.
ZappavignaM (2014)
Enacting identity in microblogging through ambient affiliation. Discourse & Communication8(2): 209–228.
81.
ZappavignaM (2015)
Searchable talk: The linguistic functions of hashtags. Social Semiotics25(3): 274–291.
82.
ZhangHPattonDKenneyM (2013)
Building global-class universities: Assessing the impact of the 985 Project. Research Policy42: 765–775.
83.
ZhangX (2020)
A bibliometric analysis of second language acquisition between 1997 and 2018. Studies in Second Language Acquisition42(1): 199–222.
