This article probes into grammatical conformity in Mandarin by examining meiyou, a multifunctional negative form, in question-answer sequences. Using a conversation analysis approach, it discovers that, as a conforming answer to polar questions, meiyou acquiesces to all the terms and constraints of the question and maximizes the progressivity of the sequence. As a non-conforming response to polar questions, it mitigates the disagreement by avoiding a pointed syntactic negation. Meiyou can also respond to Q-word questions, problematizing the inference incorporated in the question. This study not only contributes to the cross-linguistic research on negative particles in talk-in-interaction but also reveals that grammatical conformity is a crucial dimension in Mandarin response design, providing further confirmation of the link between grammar, action, and sequence organization.
AijmerK (1997) I think – An English modal particle. In: SwanTWestvikOJ (eds) Modality in Germanic Languages. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–47.
2.
Barth-WeingartenDCouper-KuhlenE (2002) On the development of final though: A case of grammaticalization? In: WischerIDiewaldG (eds) New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 345–361.
3.
BiqYO (1989) Metalinguistic negation in Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics17(1): 75–95.
4.
BoldenGB (2009) Beyond answering: Repeat-prefaced responses in conversation. Communication Monographs76(2): 121–143.
5.
BoldenGBRobinsonJD (2011) Soliciting accounts with why-interrogatives in conversation. Journal of Communication61(1): 94–119.
6.
BolingerD (1978) Yes-no questions are not alternative questions. In: HizH (ed.) Questions. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 87–105.
7.
ButtonGCaseyN (1985) Topic nomination and topic pursuit. Human Studies8(1): 3–55.
8.
ButtonGCaseyN (1988/1989) Topic initiation: Business-at-hand. Research on Language & Social Interaction22(1–4): 61–91.
9.
ChaoYR (1968) A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
10.
ChiuH (2012) Méiyou-/Búshì-(‘No-’) prefaced turns in talk show interaction – Constitutive elements of entertainment broadcasts in Taiwan. Language and Linguistics13(3): 391–435.
11.
ClaridgeCArnovickN (2010) Pragmaticalisation and discursisation. In: JuckerAHTaavitsainenI (eds) Historical Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 165–192.
12.
ClaymanSE (1993) Reformulating the question: A device for answering/not answering questions in news interviews and press conferences. Text: Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse13(2): 159–188.
13.
ClaymanSE (2001) Answers and evasions. Language in Society30(3): 403–442.
14.
CurlTS (2006) Offers of assistance: Constraints on syntactic design. Journal of Pragmatics38: 1257–1280.
15.
CurlTSDrewP (2008) Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction41(2): 129–153.
16.
DingSLüSLiR, et al. (eds) (1999) Xiandai Hanyu Yufa Jianghua [Talks On Modern Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
17.
EgbertMVögeM (2008) Wh-interrogative formats used for questioning and beyond: German warum (why) and wieso (why) and English why. Discourse Studies10(1): 17–36.
18.
EnfieldNJStiversTBrownP, et al. (2019) Polar answers. Journal of Linguistics55(2): 277–304.
19.
ErnstT (1995) Negation in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory13(4): 665–707.
20.
FordCEFoxBAHellermanJ (2004) Getting past no: Sequence, action and sound production in the projection of no-initiated turns. In: Couper-KuhlenEFordC (eds) Sound Patterns in Interaction. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 233–269.
21.
FoxBAThompsonSA (2010) Responses to wh-questions in English conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction43(2): 133–156.
22.
GoodwinCHeritageJ (1990) Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology19(1): 283–307.
23.
HakulinenA (2001) Minimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questions. Pragmatics: Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)11(1): 1–15.
24.
HayashiMKushidaS (2013) Responding with resistance to wh-questions in Japanese talk-in-interaction. Research on Language & Social Interaction46(3): 231–255.
25.
HeinemannT (2006) ‘Will you or can’t you?’: Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests. Journal of Pragmatics38(7): 1081–1104.
26.
HeinemannT (2008) Questions of accountability: Yes-no interrogatives that are unanswerable. Discourse Studies10(1): 55–71.
27.
HeinemannTLindströmASteensigJ (2011) Addressing epistemic incongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbs. In: StiversTMondadaLSteensigJ (eds) The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 107–130.
28.
HeritageJ (1988) Explanations as accounts: A conversation analytic perspective. In: AntakiC (ed.) Analyzing Everyday Explanation. London: Sage, pp. 127–144.
29.
HeritageJ (2010) Questioning in medicine. In: FreedAFEhrlichS (eds) ‘Why do you ask?’ The Functions of Questions in Institutional Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 42–68.
30.
HeritageJRaymondG (2012) Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions. In: de RuiterJP (ed.) Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179–192.
31.
HsiehML (1997) Negation in Chinese and functional projections. In: Proceedings of the Ninth North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
32.
JeffersonG (2002) Is ‘no’ an acknowledgment token? Comparing American and British uses of (+)/(-) tokens. Journal of Pragmatics34(10): 1345–1383.
33.
JeffersonG (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In: LernerG (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 13–34.
34.
KeevallikL (2010) Minimal answers to yes/no questions in the service of sequence organization. Discourse Studies12(3): 283–309.
35.
KeevallikL (2012) Compromising progressivity: ‘no’-prefacing in Estonian. Pragmatics: Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)22(1): 119–146.
36.
KimHRS (2013) Ani-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Korean conversation. In: SellsPFrellesuigB (eds) Japanese/Korean Linguistics. Stanford, CA: CSLI, pp. 383–398.
37.
KimHRS (2015) Resisting the terms of polar questions through ani (‘no’)-prefacing in Korean conversation. Discourse Processes52(4): 311–334.
38.
KoshikI (2002) A conversation analytic study of yes/no questions which convey reversed polarity assertions. Journal of Pragmatics34(12): 1851–1877.
39.
KoshikI (2003) Wh-questions used as challenges. Discourse Studies5(1): 51–77.
40.
KoshikI (2005) Alternative questions used in conversational repair. Discourse Studies7(2): 193–211.
41.
KoshikI (2017) Responses to wh-question challenges. In: RaymondGLernerGHeritageJ (eds) Enabling Human Conduct. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 79–104.
42.
Lee-GoldmanR (2011) No as a discourse marker. Journal of Pragmatics43(10): 2627–2649.
43.
LernerGH (2004) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
44.
LiCNThompsonSA (1981) Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley, CA; Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
45.
LüSLiLDLiuJ, et al. (eds) (1980) Xiandai Hanyu Babaici [800 Words of Modern Chinese]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
46.
MaL (2002) The syntactic status of Chinese negators-mei and meiyou. Working Papers of the Linguistics Circle15: 1–11.
47.
RaclawJ (2013) Indexing inferables and organizational shifts: ‘No’-prefaces in English conversation. PhD Dissertation, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO.
48.
RaymondG (2000) The structure of responding: Type-conforming and nonconforming responses to YNIs. PhD Dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
49.
RaymondG (2003) Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review68(6): 939–967.
50.
RaymondG (2010) Prosodic variation in responses: The case of type-conforming responses to yes/no interrogatives. In: Barth-WeingartenDReberESeltingM (eds) Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 109–130.
51.
SacksHSchegloffEAJeffersonG (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50: 696–735.
52.
SadockJMZwickyAM (1985) Speech act distinctions in syntax. In: ShopenT (ed.) Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 155–196.
SchegloffEA (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
SchegloffEALernerGH (2009) Beginning to respond: Well-prefaced responses to wh-questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction42(2): 91–115.
56.
SorjonenML (2001) Simple answers to polar questions. In: SeltingMCouper-KuhlenE (eds) Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 405–431.
57.
SteensigJDrewP (2008) Introduction: Questioning and affiliation/disaffiliation in interaction. Discourse Studies10(1): 5–15.
58.
StiversT (2010) An overview of the question–response system in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics42(10): 2772–2781.
59.
StiversT (2018) How we manage social relationships through answers to questions: The case of interjections. Discourse Processes56(3): 191–209.
60.
StiversTEnfieldNJ (2010) A coding scheme for question–response sequences in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics42(10): 2620–2626.
61.
StiversTHayashiM (2010) Transformative answers: One way to resist a question’s constraints. Language in Society39: 1–25.
62.
StiversTRobinsonJD (2006) A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society35(03): 367–392.
63.
StiversTRossanoF (2010) Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction43(1): 3–31.
64.
TengS (1973) Negation and aspects in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics1(1): 14–37.
65.
ThompsonSAFoxBACouper-KuhlenE (2015) Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
TsaiIN (2011) Grammar as situated practices: Conversational practices of two Mandarin yes/no question formats in talk-in-interaction. PhD Dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
67.
TurkMJ (2006) Projection in Mandarin Chinese conversation: Grammar and social interaction in question–answer sequences. PhD Dissertation, UC Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA.
68.
WangWSY (1964) Two aspect markers in Mandarin. Language41(3): 457–470.
69.
WangYF (2008) Beyond negation – The roles of meiyou and bushi in Mandarin conversation. Language Sciences30(6): 679–713.
70.
WangYFTsaiPHLingMY (2007) From informational to emotive use: Meiyou (‘no’) as a discourse marker in Taiwan Mandarin conversation. Discourse Studies9(5): 677–701.
71.
YehLH (1995) Focus, metalinguistic negation and contrastive negation. Journal of Chinese Linguistics2: 42–75.
72.
YuAJ (2004) Discourse functions of negative Meiyou in Taiwan Mandarin. MA Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
