The functional independence measure (FIM) is a clinical scale which is used to evaluate the amount of assistance disabled persons need to conduct their daily living activities. Drawing on 65 video-recorded rehabilitation team meetings and medical records collected from a Japanese hospital, this article utilizes ethnomethodology and conversation analysis to uncover how Japanese rehabilitation team members use the FIM to track changes in the functional status of patients and decide the length of stay in ongoing interactional sequences. Analysis shows that a series of the FIM scores assembled and arranged in situ provide a sequential framework for members to understand the progress of rehabilitation and predict the plateau phase. Moreover, a particular expert is asked about patients’ capacity for further improvements and his or her opinions are treated as a basis for clinical decisions. In this way, diagnostic and clinical decision-making is produced through the ongoing collaborative work of various specialists.
AngellBBoldenGB (2016) Team work in action: Building grounds for psychiatric medication decisions in assertive community treatment. In: O’ReillyMLesterJN (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Adult Mental Health: Discourse and Conversation Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 371–393.
2.
BarnesR (2007) Formulations and the facilitation of common agreement in meetings talk. Text & Talk27(3): 273–296.
3.
Beck NielsenS (2014) Medical record keeping as interactional accomplishment. Pragmatics and Society5(2): 221–242.
4.
Beck NielsenS (2016) How doctors manage consulting computer records while interacting with patients. Research on Language and Social Interaction49(1): 58–74.
5.
BergM (1996) Practices of reading and writing: The constitutive role of the patient record in medical work. Sociology of Health & Illness18(4): 499–524.
6.
BodenD (1994) The Business of Talk: Organizations in Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7.
CaroniaLSagliettiM (2017) Struggles over antibiotics: Physicians’ stance-taking toward a nonconfirming policy in an intensive care unit. Qualitative Health Research27(13): 2006–2018.
8.
CaroniaLSagliettiM (2018) Knowledge and agency in interprofessional care: How nurses contribute to the case-construction in an intensive care unit. Journal of Interprofessional Care32(5): 592–602.
9.
CaroniaLChieregatoASagliettiM (2017) Assembling (non) treatable cases: The communicative constitution of medical object in doctor-doctor interaction. Discourse Studies19(1): 30–48.
10.
DemainSWilesRRobertsL, et al. (2006) Recovery plateau following stroke: Fact or fiction?Disability and Rehabilitation28(13–14): 815–821.
11.
GarfinkelH (2006 [1948]) Seeing Sociologically: The Routine Grounds of Social Action (ed and intro. RawlsAW). Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
12.
GarfinkelHBittnerE (1967) Good organizational reasons for bad clinic records. In: GarfinkelH (ed.) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 186–207.
13.
GoodwinC (1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist96(3): 606–633.
14.
GrangerCVHamiltonBB (1987) Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation. Buffalo, NY: Research Foundation State University of New York.
15.
GreatbatchD (2006) Prescriptions and prescribing: Coordinating talk- and text-based activities. In: HeritageJMaynardDW (eds) Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 313–339.
16.
HakT (1992) Psychiatric records as transformations of other texts. In: WatsonGSeilerRM (eds) Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology. London: SAGE, pp. 138–155.
17.
HeathC (1982) Preserving the consultation: Medical record cards and professional conduct. Sociology of Health & Illness4(1): 56–74.
18.
HeathC (1986) Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HeathCLuffP (2000) Technology in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
HepburnABoldenGB (2013) The conversation analytic approach to transcription. In: SidnellJStiversT (eds) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 123–162.
21.
HeritageJ (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In: AtkinsonJMHeritageJ (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 299–345.
22.
HousleyW (2003) Interaction in Multidisciplinary Teams. Aldershot: Ashgate.
23.
IkeyaNOkadaM (2007) Doctors’ practical management of knowledge in the daily case conference. In: FrancisDHesterS (eds) Orders of Ordinary Action: Respecifying Sociological Knowledge. Burlington, VA: Ashgate, pp. 69–90.
IzumiH (2014) Local division of labor in rehabilitation team conferences. Human Studies37: 393–430.
26.
IzumiH (2017a) A technical analysis of scaling in rehabilitation team talk. Journal of Pragmatics121: 1–24.
27.
IzumiH (2017b) Help-search practices in rehabilitation team meetings: A Sacksian analysis. Human Studies40: 439–468.
28.
IzumiH (in press) Regrading and implicature: Sequential structures of mobility scales in Japanese rehabilitation team interaction. Special issue on ‘Topicalizing regrading in interaction.’Journal of Pragmatics.
29.
JonesA (2009) Creating history: Documents and patient participation in nurse-patient interviews. Sociology of Health & Illness31(6): 907–923.
30.
KoschmannTLeBronCGoodwinC, et al. (2007) Formulating the triangle of doom. Gesture7(1): 97–118.
31.
MondadaL (2011) The organization of concurrent courses of action in surgical demonstrations. In: GoodwinCLeBronCStreeckJ (eds) Embodied Interaction: Language and the Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 207–226.
32.
NishizakaA (2010) The embodied organization of a real-time fetus: The visible and the invisible in parental ultrasound examinations. Social Studies & Science41(3): 309–336.
33.
OkamotoTAndoSSonodaS, et al. (2014) ‘Kaifukuki rehabilitation ward’ in Japan. The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine51: 629–633.
34.
PageSJGaterDRBach-y-RitaP (2004) Reconsidering the motor recovery plateau in stroke rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation85(8): 1377–1381.
35.
PomerantzAM (1987) Descriptions in legal settings. In: ButtonGLeeJRE (eds) Talk and Social Organization. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 226–243.
36.
RooksbyJ (2011) Text at work: Mundane practices of reading in workplaces. In: RouncefieldMTolmieP (eds) Ethnomethodology at Work. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, pp. 173–189.
37.
Ten HaveP (1995) Medical ethnomethodology. Human Studies18: 245–261.
38.
Ten HaveP (1999) Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: SAGE.
39.
TurowetzJ (2015) Citing conduct, individualizing symptoms: Accomplishing autism diagnosis in clinical case conferences. Social Science & Medicine142: 214–222.
