What is the relation between words and action? How does a person decide, based on what someone is saying, what would be an appropriate response? We argue that (1) every move combines independent semiotic features, to be interpreted under an assumption that social behavior is goal directed; (2) responding to actions is not equivalent to describing them; and (3) describing actions invokes rights and duties for which people are explicitly accountable. We conclude that interaction does not involve a ‘binning’ procedure in which the stream of conduct is sorted into discrete action types. Our argument is grounded in data from recordings of talk-in-interaction.
AustinJL (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
BoldenGB (2006) Little words that matter: Discourse markers ‘So’ and ‘Oh’ and the doing of other-attentiveness in social interaction. Journal of Communication56: 661–688.
3.
ClarkHH (1996) Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
ClarkHHFox TreeJE (2002) Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition84: 73–111.
5.
Couper-KuhlenE (2014) What does grammar tell us about action?Pragmatics24(3): 623–647.
6.
CurlTSDrewP (2008) Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction41: 129–153.
7.
DingemanseMFloydS (2014) Conversation across cultures. In: EnfieldNJKockelmanPSidnellJ (eds) Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 434–464.
8.
DennettDC (1991) Consciousness Explained. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
9.
DingemanseMRobertsSGBaranovaJ. (2015) Universal principles in the repair of communication problems. PLoS ONE10(9): e013610.
10.
DingemanseMRossiGFloydS (2017) Place reference in story beginnings: A cross-linguistic study of narrative and interactional affordances. Language in Society46(2): 129–158.
11.
DresherE (1995) There’s no reality like psychological reality. Glot International1(1): 7.
12.
EnfieldNJ (2013) Relationship Thinking: Agency, Enchrony, and Human Sociality. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
EnfieldNJ (2017) How We Talk: The Inner Workings of Conversation. New York: Basic Books.
14.
EnfieldNJKockelmanP (eds) (2017) Distributed Agency. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
EnfieldNJSidnellJ (2017) The Concept of Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
FloydSRossiGBaranovaJ. (2014) Recruitments across languages: A systematic comparison. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Conversation Analysis, University of California at Los Angeles, CA.
17.
GarfinkelH (1952) The Perception of the Other: A Study in Social Order. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
GibbsRW (1983) Do people always process the literal meanings of indirect requests?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition9(3): 524–533.
19.
GigerenzerGHertwigRPachurT (eds) (2011) Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
GilbertM (1992) On Social Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
GoodwinC (1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In: PsathasG (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, pp. 97–121.
22.
HeinemannT (2006) “Will you or can’t you?”: Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests, Journal of Pragmatics38: 1081–1104.
23.
HeritageJ (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
24.
HeritageJ (2012) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction45: 1–29.
25.
JakobsonR (1957) Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. In: JakobsonR (ed.) Selected Writings, Vol II. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 130–147.
26.
JeffersonG (1978) Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In: SchenkeinJ (ed.) Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York: Academic Press, pp. 219–248.
27.
LocalJWalkerG (2012) How phonetic features project more talk. Journal of the International Phonetic Association42(3): 255–280.
28.
KockelmanP (2005) The semiotic stance. Semiotica157 (1–4): 233–304.
29.
KrebsJRDawkinsR (1984) Animal signals: Mind-reading and manipulation. In: KrebsJRDaviesNB (eds) Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 2nd edn.London: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 380–405.
30.
LeveltWJM (1989) Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
31.
LevinsonSC (2013) Action formation and ascription. In: SidnellJStiversT (eds) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 103–130.
32.
LevinsonSC (2017) Speech acts. In: HuangY (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 199–216.
33.
RaymondG (2004) Prompting action: The stand-alone ‘so’ in sequences of talk-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction37(2): 185–218.
34.
RaymondGLernerGH (2014) A body and its involvements: Adjusting action for dual involvements. In: HaddingtonPKeisanenTMondadaL. (eds) Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 227–245.
35.
RobinsonJ (2016) Accountability in social interaction. In: RobinsonJ (ed.) Accountability in Social Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–44.
RossiG (2015) The request system in Italian interaction. PhD Thesis, Radboud University, Nijmegen.
38.
RossiGZinkenJ (2016) Grammar and social agency: The pragmatics of impersonal deontic statements. Language92(4): e296–e325.
39.
RumseyA (1990) Wording, meaning, and linguistic ideology. American Anthropologist92(2): 346–361.
40.
SacksH (1995) Lectures on Conversation, vols 1 and 2. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
41.
SacksHSchegloffEA (1979) Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons and their interaction. In: PsathasG (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, pp. 15–21.
42.
SacksHSchegloffEAJeffersonG (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50: 696–735.
43.
SapirE (1933) La Réalité Psychologique des Phonèmes [The Psychological Reality of Phonemes]. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathalogique (Paris)30: 247–265.
44.
SchegloffEA (1981) Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics71: 71–93.
45.
SchegloffEA (1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences. In: TannenD (ed.) Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1981: Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 71–93.
46.
SchegloffEA (1988) Description in the social sciences I: Talk-in-interaction. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics2(1): 1–24.
47.
SchegloffEA (1992) Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology97(5): 1295–1345.
48.
SchegloffEA (1996) Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology102(1): 161–216.
49.
SchegloffEA (1997) Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes23(3): 499–545.
50.
SchegloffEA (2006a) Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In: EnfieldNJLevinsonSC (eds) Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition, and Interaction. Oxford: Berg Publishers, pp. 70–96.
51.
SchegloffEA (2006b) On possibles. Discourse Studies8(1): 141–157.
52.
SchegloffEA (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
SchegloffEA (2009) Prolegomena to the Analysis of Action(s) in Talk-in-interaction. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Language, Interaction, and Social Organization, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 14–16 May.
54.
SchegloffEA (2010) Some other u(h)ms. Discourse Processes47(2): 130–174.
55.
SchegloffEASacksH (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica8: 289–327.
56.
SchellingTC (1960) The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
SearleJR (1969) Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58.
SearleJR (1983) Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
SearleJR (2010) Making the Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60.
SidnellJ (2009) Comparative perspectives in conversation analysis. In: SidnellJ (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–28.
61.
SidnellJ (2010) Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
62.
SidnellJ (2007) Comparative studies in conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology36(1): 229–244. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094313.
63.
SidnellJ (2017) Action in interaction is conduct under a description. Language in Society46(3): 313–337.
64.
SidnellJEnfieldNJ (2012) Language diversity and social action: A third locus of linguistic relativity. Current Anthropology53: 302–333.
65.
SilversteinM (1979) Language structure and linguistic ideology. In: ClynePRHanksWFHofbauerCL (eds) The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 193–247.
66.
StiversT (2008) Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction41(1): 31–57.
67.
StiversTRossanoF (2010) Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction43(1): 3–31.
68.
TomaselloM (2008) Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
69.
WalkerG (2012) Coordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resources: ‘Trail-off’ conjunctions. Language and Speech55(1): 141–163.
