This article examines a productive use of communicating gender stereotypes in interpersonal conversation: to resist activities traditionally prescribed according to gender. The analyses video-taped naturally occurring US household interactions and present three techniques participants may deploy to contest gender expectations: mobilizing categories, motivating alignment and reframing action. We show how gender is an accountable category in relation to household labor, and how gender categories provide a resource by which participants can non-seriously solicit and resist participation in domestic gender-prescribed activities. Our analysis provides some insight into how participants use gender stereotypes in everyday talk and what functions such talk serves.
AladuwakaSOberhauserAM (2014) Out of the kitchen. In: OberhauserAMJohnston-AnumonwoI (eds) Global Perspectives on Gender and Space: Engaging Feminism and Development. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 35–52.
2.
AtkinsonJMHeritageJ (1984) Transcript notation. In: AtkinsonJMHeritageJ (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. ix–xvi.
3.
BakerCD (2000) Locating culture in action: Membership categorisation in texts and talk. In: LeeAPoyntonC (eds) Culture & Text: Discourse and Methodology in Social Research and Cultural Studies. St Leonards, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin, pp. 99–113.
4.
BemSL (1993) The Lenses of Gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
BianchiSMSayerLCMilkieMAet al. (2012) Housework: Who did, does or will do it, and how much does it matter?Social Forces91(1): 55–63.
6.
BiernatMDeauxK (2012) A history of social psychological research on gender. In: KruglanskiAWStroebeW (eds) Handbook of the History of Social Psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press, pp. 475–498.
7.
BodenhausenGVMacraeCN (1996) The self-regulation of intergroup perception: Mechanisms and consequences of stereotype suppression. In: MacraeCNStangorCHewstoneM (eds) Stereotypes and Stereotyping. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 227–253.
8.
BossGP (1979) The stereotype and its correspondence in discourse to the enthymeme. Communication Quarterly27: 22–27.
9.
ButlerCWeatherallA (2006) ‘No, we’re not playing families’: Membership categorization in children’s play. Research on Language and Social Interaction39(4): 441–470.
10.
ButtnyR (1993) Social Accountability in Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
CameronD (1997) Performing gender identity: Young men’s talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. In: JohnsonSMeinhofUH (eds) Language and Masculinity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 47–64.
12.
CanaryDJStaffordLHauseKSet al. (1993) An inductive analysis of relational maintenance strategies: Comparisons among lovers, relatives, friends, and others. Communication Research Reports10(1): 3–14.
13.
CondorS (2006) Public prejudice as collaborative accomplishment: Towards a dialogic social psychology of racism. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology16: 1–18.
14.
CoxWTDevinePG (2015) Stereotypes possess heterogeneous directionality: A theoretical and empirical exploration of stereotype structure and content. PLoS ONE10(3): e0122292.
15.
CraigRTTracyK (1995) Grounded practical theory: The case of intellectual discussion. Communication Theory5(3): 248–272.
16.
de LopezKL (2013) Clause-final man in Tyneside English. Language and Computers77(1): 139–162.
17.
DubrofskyREWoodMM (2014) Posting racism and sexism: Authenticity, agency and self-reflexivity in social media. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies11(3): 282–287.
18.
EdleyNWetherellM (2008) Discursive psychology and the study of gender: A contested space. In: HarringtonKLitosselitiLSaunstonHet al. (eds) Gender and Language Research Methodologies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 161–173.
19.
EdwardsD (1991) Categories are for talking: On the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization. Theory & Psychology1(4): 515–542.
20.
EdwardsD (1998) The relevant thing about her: Social identity categories in use. In: AntakiCWiddicombeS (eds) Identities in Talk. London: Sage, pp. 15–33.
21.
EdwardsD (2005) Moaning, whinging and laughing: The subjective side of complaints. Discourse Studies7(1): 5–29.
EvaldssonAC (2007) Accounting for friendship: Moral ordering and category membership in preadolescent girls’ relational talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction40(4): 377–404.
25.
GarfinkelH (1996) Ethnomethodology’s program. Social Psychology Quarterly59(1): 5–21.
26.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Philadelphia, PA: Anchor Books.
27.
GoffmanE (1969) Strategic Interaction. Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.
HallKBucholtzM (2012) (eds) Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self. London: Routledge.
30.
HintonPR (2000) Stereotypes, Cognition and Culture. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
31.
HopperR (2003) Gendering Talk. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
32.
HopperRLeBaronC (1998) How gender creeps into talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction31: 59–74.
33.
HousleyWFitzgeraldR (2002) The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis. Qualitative Research2(1): 59–83.
34.
JaworskiACouplandN (2014) The Discourse Reader. New York: Routledge.
35.
JayyusiL (2014) Categorization and the Moral Order (Routledge Revivals). London: Routledge.
36.
KashimaY (2000) Maintaining cultural stereotypes in the serial reproduction of narratives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin26: 594–604.
37.
KitzingerC (2008) Conversation analysis: Technical matters for gender research. In: HarringtonKLitosselitiLSauntsonHet al. (eds) Gender and Language Research Methodologies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 119–138.
38.
KuryloA (2012) What are they like? Non-expert definitions of stereotypes and their implications for stereotype maintenance. Qualitative Research in Psychology9(4): 337–350.
39.
KuryloA (2013) The Communicated Stereotype: From Celebrity Vilification to Everyday Talk. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
40.
KuryloARoblesJS (2015) How should I respond to them? An emergent categorization of responses to interpersonally communicated stereotypes. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research44(1): 64–91.
41.
LevinsonSC (2013) Action formation and ascription. In: SidnellJStiversT (eds) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 101–130.
MinochaS (2009) A case study-based investigation of students’ experiences with social software tools. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia15(3): 245–265.
44.
OchsETaylorC (2001) The ‘father knows best’ dynamic in dinnertime narratives. In: HallKBucholtzM (eds) Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 97–121.
45.
PomerantzA (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In: AtkinsonJMHeritageJ (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–101.
46.
PomerantzA (1986) Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human studies9(2): 219–229.
47.
PomerantzAMandelbaumJ (2005) Conversation analytic approaches to the relevance and uses of relationship categories in interaction. In: FitchKSandersR (eds) Handbook of Language and Social Interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 149–174.
48.
PsathasG (1999) Studying the organization in action: Membership categorization and interaction analysis. Human Studies22(2–4): 139–162.
49.
RapleyMMcCarthyDMcHoulA (2003) Mentality or morality? Membership categorization, multiple meanings and mass murder. British Journal of Social Psychology42(3): 427–444.
50.
RoblesJS (2015a) Directives. In: Tracy (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction (pp. 372–377). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
51.
RoblesJS (2015b) Extreme case (re)formulation as a practice for making hearably racist talk repairable. Journal of Language and Social Psychology34: 390–409.
52.
SacksH (1986) On the analyzability of stories by children. In: GumperzJJHymesD (eds) Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication (pp. 325–345). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
53.
SandersREFitchKL (2001) The actual practice of compliance seeking. Communication Theory11: 263–289.
54.
SchegloffEA (1987) Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly50(2): 101–114.
55.
SchegloffEA (2007) Categories in action: Person-reference and membership categorization. Discourse Studies9(4): 433–461.
56.
SchegloffEAJeffersonGSacksH (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language53: 361–382.
57.
SeminGR (2000) Agenda 2000: Communication: Language as an implementational device for cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology30: 595–612.
58.
SpeerSA (2001) Reconsidering the concept of hegemonic masculinity: Discursive psychology, conversation analysis and participants’ orientations. Feminism & Psychology11(1): 107–135.
59.
SpeerSA (2005) Gender Talk: Feminism, Discourse and Conversation Analysis. New York and London: Psychology Press.
60.
SpeerSAStokoeE (2011) (eds) Conversation and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
StakeRE (2000) Case Studies. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 134–164.
62.
StokoeE (2008) Categories, actions and sequences: Formulating gender in talk-in-interaction. In: HarringtonKLitosselitiLSauntsonHet al. (eds) Gender and Language Research Methodologies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 139–160.
63.
StokoeE (2009) Doing actions with identity categories: Complaints and denials in neighbor disputes. Text and Talk: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies29(1): 75–97.
64.
StokoeE (2011) ‘Girl – woman – sorry!’ On the repair and non-repair of consecutive gender categories. In: SpeerSAStokoeE (eds) Conversation and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 85–111.
65.
StokoeE (2012) Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies14(3): 277–303.
66.
StokoeEH (2003) Mothers, single women and sluts: Gender, morality and membership categorization in neighbour disputes. Feminism & Psychology13(3): 317–344.
67.
StokoeEEdwardsD (2014) Mundane morality: Gender, categories and complaints in familial neighbour disputes. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice9(2): 165–192.
68.
StokoeEHSmithsonJ (2001) Making gender relevant: Conversation analysis and gender categories in interaction. Discourse & Society12(2): 217–244.
69.
TannenD (2004) Talking the dog: Framing pets as interactional resources in family discourse. Research on Language and Social Interaction37: 399–420.
70.
TracyKRoblesJS (2013) Everyday Talk: Building and Reflecting Identities. New York: Guilford Press.
71.
Van DijkTA (1992) Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse & Society3(1): 87–118.
72.
WestCZimmermanDH (1987) Doing gender. Gender and Society1(2): 125–151.
73.
WiddicombeS (1998) Identity as an analysts’ and a participants’ resource. In: AntakiCWiddicombeS (eds) Identities in Talk. London: Sage, pp. 191–206.
74.
WigboldusDHSeminGRSpearsR (2000) How do we communicate stereotypes? Linguistic bases and inferential consequences. Journal of personality and social psychology78(1): 5.
75.
WodakR (ed.) (1997) Gender and Discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
