Various fields have examined the activity of flirting, predominantly based on experimental and reported data; the interactional workings are therefore often overlooked. Based on emails and chats from two Danish online dating sites, this article investigates how users negotiate romantic connections through the flirting strategy of ‘imagined togetherness’, linguistically constructing imagery of a shared future. Using the notion of the chronotope, turn-by-turn analysis demonstrates how users, embedded in the activity of getting to know each other, tenuously communicate romantic interest by alluding to future points at which they might be together. Central to the strategy is a sequential pattern of avoiding closure and thereby preserving the imagery’s implicitness. The article concludes by arguing that while imagined togetherness functions to probe interests and thus protects oneself from potential rejection, it also draws on fundamental dynamics of fantasy in nourishing the excitement of romantic possibility.
Adams-ThiesB (2012) Fluid bodies or bodily fluids: Bodily reconfigurations in cybersex. Journal of Language and Sexuality1(2): 179–205.
2.
AhearnLM (2003) Writing desire in Nepali love letters. Language & Communication23(2): 107–122.
3.
AntakiC (2004) The uses of absurdity. In: Van den BergHHoutkoop-SteenstraHWetherellM (eds) Analysing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Interview Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press pp.85–102.
4.
BakhtinMM (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
5.
BaronNS (2008) Always on: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
BrownPLevinsonSC (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
CameronDKulickD (2003) Language and Sexuality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
CameronDKulickD (2006) General introduction. In: CameronDKulickD (eds) The Language and Sexuality Reader. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 1–12.
9.
ChaykoM (2008) Portable Communities: The Social Dynamics of Online and Mobile Connectedness. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
10.
DaricsE (2010) Politeness in computer-mediated discourse of a virtual team. Journal of Politeness Research6(1): 129–150.
11.
DeleuzeGParnetC (2002) Dialogues II, 2nd rev. edn. New York: Columbia University Press.
12.
Del-Teso-CraviottoM (2006) Language and sexuality in Spanish and English dating chats. Journal of SocioLinguistics10(4): 460–480.
13.
Del-Teso-CraviottoM (2008) Gender and sexual identity authentication in language use: The case of chat rooms. Discourse Studies10(2): 251–270.
14.
DickHP (2010) Imagined lives and modernist chronotopes in Mexican nonmigrant discourse. American Ethnologist37(2): 275–290.
15.
DouglasBTewksburyR (2008) Theaters and sex: An examination of anonymous sexual encounters in an erotic oasis. Deviant Behavior29(1): 1–17.
16.
DresnerEHerringSC (2010) Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory20(3): 249–268.
17.
EckertPMcConnell-GinetS (2013) Language and Gender, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
EdwardsD (1995) Two to tango: Script formulations, dispositions, and rhetorical symmetry in relationship troubles talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction28(4): 319–350.
19.
FismanRIyengarSSKamenicaE. (2006) Gender differences in mate selection: Evidence from a speed dating experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics121(2): 673–697.
20.
FordCE (1997) Speaking conditionally: Some contexts for if-clauses in conversation. In: AthanasiadouADirvenR (eds) On Conditionals Again. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.387–416.
21.
GumperzGJ (1999) On interactional sociolinguistic method. In: SarangiS (ed.) Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.453–471.
22.
HallK (1995) Lip service on the fantasy line. In: HallKBucholtzM (eds) Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self. New York: Routledge, pp.183–216.
23.
HårdafSegerstedtY (2002) Use and adaptation of written language to the conditions of computer-mediated communication. PhD Thesis, Göteborg University, Gothenburg.
24.
HarveyKShalomC (1997) Language and Desire: Encoding Sex, Romance and Intimacy. London; New York: Routledge.
25.
HerzRSInzlichtM (2002) Sex differences in response to physical and social factors involved in human mate selection: The importance of smell for women. Evolution and Human Behavior23(5): 359–364.
26.
JensenTJ (2009) Non-realitetsmarkører i dansk talesprog: hvis man kunne sige det på den måde. Studier i Nordisk2006–2007: 75–101.
27.
JonesGMSchieffelinBBSmithRE (2011) When friends who talk together stalk together: Online gossip as metacommunication. In: MroczekKThurlowC (eds) Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.26–47.
28.
JonesRH (2005) ‘You show me yours, I’ll show you mine’: The negotiation of shifts from textual to visual modes in computer-mediated interaction among gay men. Visual Communication4(1): 69–92.
29.
KieslingS (2011) The interactional construction of desire as gender. Gender and Language5(2): 213–239.
30.
KieslingS (2013) Flirting and ‘normative’ sexualities. Journal of Language and Sexuality2(1): 101–121.
31.
KingBW (2012) Location, Iore and language: An erotic triangle. Journal of Language and Sexuality1/1: 106–125.
32.
KingBW (2011) Language, sexuality and place: The view from cyberspace. Gender and Language5(1): 1–30.
33.
KorobovN (2011a) Gendering desire in speed-dating interaction. Discourse Studies13(4): 461–485.
34.
KorobovN (2011b) Mate-preference talk in speed-dating conversations. Research on Language and Social Interaction44(2): 186–209.
35.
KulickD (2003) No. Language & Communication23(2): 139–151.
36.
LempertMPerrinoS (2007) Entextualization and the ends of temporality. Language & Communication27(3): 205–211.
37.
MandelbaumJ (1987) Couples sharing stories. Communication Quarterly35(2): 144–170.
38.
MandelbaumJ (2003) Interactive methods for constructing relationships. In: GlennPLeBaronCMandelbaumJ (eds) Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In Honor of Robert Hopper. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.207–220.
39.
MortensenKK (2015a) Informed consent in the field of language and sexuality: The case of online dating research. Journal of Language and Sexuality4(1): 1–29.
40.
MortensenKK (2015b) Women’s homosocial constructions of heterosexual desire in online dating. Gender and Language9(3): 461–488.
41.
OngKKW (2011) Disagreement, confusion, disapproval, turn elicitation and floor holding: Actions as accomplished by ellipses marks-only turns and blank turns in quasisynchronous chats. Discourse Studies13(2): 211–234.
42.
PomerantzAMandelbaumJ (2005) A conversation analytic approach to relationships: Their relevance for interactional conduct. In: FitchKSandersRE (eds) Handbook of Language and Social Interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.149–171.
43.
SilversteinM (2005) Axes of evals. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology15(1): 6–22.
44.
SimmelG (1984 [1919]) On Women, Sexuality and Love. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press.
45.
SimpsonJ (2005) Meaning-making online: Discourse and CMC in a language learning community. In: VilasAMPereiraBGGonzalezJM . (eds) Recent Research Development in Learning Technologies. Badajoz: Formatex, 175–179.
46.
SprecherSWenzelAHarveyJ (eds) (2008) Handbook of Relationship Initiation. New York: Psychology Press.
47.
StokoeE (2010) ‘Have you been married, or …?’: Eliciting and accounting for relationship histories in speed-dating interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction43(3): 260–282.
48.
StraehleCA (1993) ‘Samuel?’ ‘yes, dear?’: Teasing and conversational rapport. In: TannenD (ed.) Framing in Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.210–230.
49.
SvennevigJ (1999) Getting Acquainted in Conversation. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
50.
TainioL (2002) Negotiating gender identities and sexual agency in elderly couples’ talk. In: McIlvennyP (ed.) Talking Gender and Sexuality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.181–206.
