The epistemics of Epistemics: An introduction

Clift R (2012) Who knew? A view from linguistics. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 69–75.

Drew P (2012) What drives sequences? Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 61–68.

Garfinkel H Livingston E Lynch M . (1988) Respecifying the natural sciences as discovering sciences of practical action, I & II: Doing so ethnographically by administering a schedule of contingencies in discussions with laboratory scientists and by hanging around their laboratories. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, University of California at Los Angeles.

Heritage J (2012a) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 1–29.

Heritage J (2012b) The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 30–52.

Heritage J Atkinson JM (1984) Introduction. In: Atkinson JM Heritage J (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–15.

Heritage J Raymond G (2005) The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1): 15–38.

Jefferson G (1978) What’s in a ‘nyem’? Sociology 12(1): 135–139.

Lynch M (1993) Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lynch M (2000) The ethnomethodological foundations of conversation analysis. Text 20(4): 517–532.

Lynch M Bogen D (1994) Harvey Sacks’s primitive natural science. Theory, Culture & Society 11(4): 65–104.

Sacks H (1984a) Notes on methodology. In: Atkinson JM Heritage J (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–27.

Sacks H (1984b) Doing ‘being ordinary’. In: Atkinson JM Heritage J (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 413–429.

Sacks H Schegloff EA Jefferson G (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735.

Schegloff EA (1986) The routine as achievement. Human Studies 9: 111–151.

Schegloff EA (1992) Introduction. In: Jefferson G (ed.) Harvey Sacks: Lectures on Conversation, vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. ix–lxii.

Schegloff EA (1997) Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society 8: 165–187.

Sidnell J (2012) Declaratives, questioning, defeasibility. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 53–60.

Sidnell J (2015) Epistemics. In: Tracy K (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, 1st edn. John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1–13.

Sormani P (2013) A review of Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, Jacob Steensig (eds): The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14: 67–84.

Te Molder H (2016) What happened to post-cognitive psychology? In: Tileaga C Stokoe E (eds) Discursive Psychology: Classic and Contemporary Issues. London: Routledge, pp. 73–100.

Van Dijk T (2013) The field of epistemic discourse analysis. Discourse Studies 15(5): 497–499.