Abstract

Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Archer
D
Grundy
P
(2011 ) The Pragmatics Reader . New York : Routledge .
2.
Arundale
R
(1999 ) An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative to politeness theory . Pragmatics 9 (1 ): 119 –154 .
3.
Arundale
R
(2008 ) Against Gricean intentions at the heart of human interaction . Intercultural Pragmatics 5 (2 ): 229 –258 .
4.
Arundale
R
(2010 ) Constituting face in conversation: Face, facework, and interactional achievement . Journal of Pragmatics 42 : 2078 –2105 .
5.
Garces-Conejos Blitvich
P
(2010a ) A genre approach to the study of im-politeness . International Review of Pragmatics 2 (1 ): 535 –559 .
6.
Garces-Conejos Blitvich
P
(2010b ) Introduction: The status-quo and quo vadis of impoliteness research . Intercultural Pragmatics 7 (4 ): 535 –559 .
7.
Haugh
M
(2008 ) Intention in pragmatics . Intercultural Pragmatics 5 (2 ): 1 –8 .
8.
Mey
J
(2001 ) Pragmatics: An Introduction . Malden, MA : Blackwell .
9.
Odebunmi
A
(2015 ) Ọmọlúàbí . In:
Ostman
JO
Verschueren
J
(eds) Handbook of Pragmatics, 19 (2015 Installment) . Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA : John Benjamins , pp. 1 –20 .
10.
Van Dijk
TA
(2008 ) Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
