In this double case study of child psychotherapy, we demonstrate the positive effect of children’s involvement in play activities on their verbal expression of inner emotions and cognitions. Discourse analysis of therapy sessions complemented with the therapist’s reflections show that children who have difficulty in verbalizing hard feelings and cognitions gain control of the communicative situation by getting involved in playful activities. Therapists’ verbal entrance into play can be used to negotiate the therapist–child relationship in terms of power and solidarity.
Blesedell CrepeauE (1991) Achieving intersubjective understanding: Examples from an occupational therapy treatment session. American Journal of Occupational Therapy45(11): 1016–1025.
2.
ClementeI (2009) Progressivity and participation: Children’s management of parental assistance in paediatric chronic pain encounters. Sociology of Health & Illness31(1): 872–888.
3.
Doherty-SneddonGPhelpsFClarkJ (2007) Development of gaze aversion over the early school years. British Journal of Developmental Psychology25(4): 513–526.
4.
EndlerNFlettGMacrodimitrisSCoraceKKocovskiN (2002) Separation, self-disclosure, and social evaluation anxiety as facets of trait social anxiety. European Journal of Personality16(4): 239–269.
5.
GoffmanE (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
6.
GoffmanE (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
7.
GordonC (2008) A(p)parent play: Blending frames and reframing in family talk. Language in Society37(3): 319–349.
8.
GordonC (2009) Making Meanings, Creating Family: Intertextuality and Framing in Family Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
HermansHHermans-JansenE (1995) Self-Narratives: The Construction of Meaning in Psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press.
10.
HoyleS (1993) Participation frameworks in broadcasting play. In: TannenD (ed.) Framing in Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 114–145.
11.
HutchbyI (2007) The Discourse of Child Counselling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
12.
HutchbyIMoran-EllisJ (1998) Situating children’s social competence. In: HutchbyIMoran-EllisJ (eds) Children’s and Social Competence: Arenas of Action. London: Routledge, pp. 7–26.
13.
HutchbyIO’ReillyMParkerN (2012) Ethics in praxis: Negotiating the presence and functions of a video camera in family therapy. Discourse Studies14(6): 675–690.
14.
JeffersonG (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In: LernerG (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–31.
15.
KleinM (1934) The Psychoanalysis of Children. London: Hogarth.
16.
LeudarISharrockWTruckleS (2008) Conversation of emotions: On turning play into psychoanalytic psychotherapy. In: PeräkyläAAntakiCVehviläinenSLeudarI (eds) Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 152–172.
17.
LinellP (1998) Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18.
LinellPBredmarM (1996) Reconstructing topical sensitivity: Aspects of face-work in talks between midwives and expectant mothers. Research on Language and Social Interaction29: 347–379.
19.
LinellPPersson ThunqvistD (2003) Moving in and out of framings: Activity contexts in talks with young unemployed people within a training project. Journal of Pragmatics35(3): 409–434.
20.
MortolaPHitonHGrantS (2008) BAM! Boys Advocacy and Mentoring: A Leader’s Guide to Facilitating Strengths-based Groups for Boys – Helping Boys Make Better Contact by Making Better Contact with Them, Counseling and Psychotherapy with Boys and Men series. New York and London: Routledge.
21.
SealeCButlerCHutchbyI. (2007) Negotiating frame ambiguity: A study of simulated encounters in medical education. Communication & Medicine4(2): 177–188.
22.
TannenD (1989) Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
TannenD (1993) What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In: TannenD (ed.) Framing in Discourse. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 14–56.
24.
TannenD (1994) Gender and Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
TannenDWallatC (1987) Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. Social Psychology Quarterly50(2): 205–216.
26.
van DoornFLouweJ (2006) De kinder-ZKM. Samen zoeken naar ‘Ik’ [The Child Self Confrontation Method. Joint looking for ‘I’]. In: LouweJNautaJ (eds) Zelf onderzoek met kinderen en jongeren. Een relationele methodiek [Self investigation with children and adolescents. A relational method]. Utrecht: Agiel, pp. 161–170.
27.
van NijnattenCvan DoornF (2007) Creating communication. Self-examination as a therapeutic method for children. Journal of Social Work Practice21: 337–347.
28.
WeijtsWHoutkoopHMullenP (1993) Talking delicacy: Speaking about sexuality during gynaecological consultations. Sociology of Health & Illness15(3): 295–314.
