Text interpretation – the main interest of discourse analysts – is a central component of the text understanding process. In this article we introduce the Landscape Model, which describes the cognitive processes underlying reading comprehension in a detailed and precise manner. Moreover, this model captures the interpretative processes in which the human mind engages during reading. Within the context of the Landscape Model, we describe the relation between discourse understanding and discourse interpretation, and explain some of the phenomena that are central to the field of discourse analysis as seen from a cognitive perspective. In the first section we describe the basic cognitive processes that underlie discourse understanding, as captured by the Landscape Model. In the following section we illustrate the way that the Landscape Model can be applied to the work of discourse analysts. We conclude by discussing the usefulness of the cognitive Landscape Model for the field of discourse analysis.
BellA (2011) Re-constructing Babel: Discourse analysis, hermeneutics and the Interpretive Arc. Discourse Studies13: 519–568.
2.
CookAEGueraudS (2005) What have we been missing? The role of general world knowledge in discourse processing. Discourse Processes39: 365–378.
3.
GraesserASingerMTrabassoT (1994) Constructing inferences during narrative comprehension. Psychological Review101: 371–395.
4.
GraesserACMillisKKZwaanRA (1997) Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology48: 163–189.
5.
KendeouPvan den BroekP (2007) Interactions between prior knowledge and text structure during comprehension of scientific texts. Memory and Cognition35: 1567–1577.
6.
KintschW (1998) Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
LinderholmTvan den BroekP (2002) The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology94: 778–784.
8.
LinderholmTVirtueSvan den BroekPTzengY (2004) Fluctuations in the availability of information during reading: Capturing cognitive processes using the landscape model. Discourse Processes37: 165–186.
9.
LongDLLeaRB (2005) Have we been searching for meaning in all the wrong places? Defining the ‘search after meaning’ principle in comprehension. Discourse Processes39: 279–298.
MyersJLO’BrienEJ (1998) Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes26: 131–157.
12.
NarvaezDvan den BroekPRuizAB (1999) The influence of reading purpose on inference generation and comprehension in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology91: 488–496.
13.
O’BrienEJMyersJL (1999) Text comprehension: A view from the bottom up. In: GoldmanSRGraesserACvan den BroekP (eds) Narrative Comprehension, Causality, and Coherence: Essays in Honor of Tom Trabasso. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 35–53.
14.
O’BrienEJAlbrechtJEHakalaCMRizzellaML (1995) Activation and suppression of antecedents during reinstatement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition21: 626–634.
15.
SandersT (1997) Semantic and pragmatic sources of coherence: On the categorization of coherence relations in context. Discourse Processes24: 119–147.
16.
SingerMGraesserACTrabassoT (1994) Minimal or global inference during reading. Journal of Memory and Language33: 421–441.
17.
TrabassoTSeccoTvan den BroekPW (1984) Causal cohesion and story coherence. In: MandlHSteinNLTrabassoT (eds) Learning and Comprehension of Text. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 83–111.
18.
van den BroekP (1994) Comprehension and memory for narrative texts: Inferences and coherence. In: GernsbacherMA (ed.) Handbook of Psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 539–588.
19.
van den BroekPKendeouP (2008) Cognitive processes in comprehension of science text: The role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology22: 335–351.
20.
van den BroekPKremerK (1999) The mind in action: What it means to comprehend. In: TaylorBGravesMvan den BroekP (eds) Reading for Meaning. New York: Teachers College Press, 1–31.
21.
van den BroekPBohn-GettlerCMKendeouPCarlsonS (2011) When a reader meets a text: The role of standards of coherence in reading comprehension. In: McCruddenMTMaglianoJSchrawG (eds) Relevance Instructions and Goal-focusing in Text Learning. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
22.
van den BroekPFletcherCRRisdenK (1993) Investigations of inferential processes in reading: A theoretical and methodological integration. Discourse Processes16: 169–180.
23.
van den BroekPLorchREJLinderholmTGustafsonM (2001) The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory and Cognition29: 1081–1087.
24.
van den BroekPRappDNKendeouP (2005) Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes39: 299–316.
25.
van den BroekPRisdenKHusebye-HartmannE (1995) The role of reader’s standards of coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In: LorchEPO’BrienEJ (eds) Sources of Coherence in Reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 353–374.
26.
van den BroekPYoungMTzengYLinderholmT (1999) The Landscape Model of reading. In: van OostendorpHGoldmanSR (eds) The Construction of Mental Representations During Reading. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 71–98.
27.
van den BroekPWLorchEPThurlowR (1996) Children’s and adults’ memory for television stories: The role of causal factors, story-grammar categories and hierarchical level. Child Development67: 3010–3029.
