This article studies an argument that took place in an institutional setting and specifies six functions of talk and embodied practices employed in an argument between a superior and her subordinate. The article shows how certain argumentative conducts and their subsequent responses preserve the institutional hierarchical relationship. The article’s final section considers three resultant issues: 1) argumentative practices and their relation to various institutional hierarchies; 2) argumentative practices between people holding different versus similar hierarchical positions; and 3) the extent to which verbal defiance accompanied by embodied practices can be maintained.
Argyris, C. ( 1957) Personality and Organization. New York : Harper & Brothers.
2.
Berman, R.A. ( 1978) Modern Hebrew Structure. Tel Aviv: University Publishing Projects.
3.
Blue, P.M. and Scott, R.W. ( 1962) Formal Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Chandler.
4.
Clark, H.H. ( 2002) ‘Speaking in Time’, Speech Communication36: 5-13.
5.
Clayman, S. and Gill, V. ( 2004) ‘Conversation Analysis’, in A. Byman and M. Hardy (eds) Handbook of Data Analysis, pp. 589-606. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
Cobb-Moore, C., Danby, S. and Farrell, A. ( 2008) ‘"I Told You So": Justification Use in Disputes in Young Children’s Interactions in an Early Childhood Classroom’ , Discourse Studies10: 595-614.
7.
Dale, K. and Burrell, G. ( 2000) ‘What Shape Are We In? Organization Theory and the Organized Body’, in J. Hassard, R. Holliday and H. Willmott (eds) Body and Organization, pp. 15-30. London : Sage.
8.
Drew, P. and Heritage, J. ( 1992) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Eilam, G. and Shamir, B. ( 2005) ‘Organizational Change and Self-Concept Threats’ , The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science41: 399-421.
10.
Engle, M.S. ( 1979) ‘Going to Court: Strategies of Dispute Management in an American Urban Neighborhood’, Law and Society13: 891-925.
11.
Floyd, S.W. and Lane, P.J. ( 2000) ‘Strategizing throughout the Organization: Managing Role Conflict in Strategic Renewal’, The Academy of Management Review25: 154-77.
12.
Fullan, M. ( 1982) The Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College.
13.
Gardner, R. ( 2001) When Listeners Talk: Response Tokens and Listener Stance . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14.
Glinert, L. ( 1989) The Grammar of Modern Hebrew. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
15.
Goffman, E. ( 1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.
16.
Goodson, I., Moore, S. and Hargreaves, A. ( 2006) ‘Teacher Nostalgia and the Sustainability of Reform: The Generation and Degeneration of Teachers’ Missions, Memory and Meaning’ , Educational Administration Quarterly42: 42-61.
17.
Goodwin, C. ( 1979) ‘The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversations’, in G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, pp. 97-121. New York: Irvington.
18.
Goodwin, C. ( 2000) ‘Practices of Seeing: Visual Analysis: An Ethnomethodological Approach’, in T. van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt (eds) Handbook of Visual Analysis , pp. 157-82. London: Sage.
19.
Goodwin, C. ( 2007) ‘Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities’, Discourse & Society18: 53-73.
20.
Goodwin, C. and Goodwin, M.H. ( 1990) ‘Interstitial Argument’, in A. Grimshaw (ed.) Conflict Talk, pp. 85-117. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
21.
Goodwin, M.H. ( 1990) He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
22.
Goodwin, M.H. and Goodwin, C. ( 1987) ‘Children’s Arguing’, in S. Phillips, S. Steele and C. Tanz (eds) Language, Gender and Sex in Comparative Perspective, pp. 200-48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Goodwin, M.H. and Goodwin, C. ( 2001) ‘Emotion within Situated Activity’, in A. Duranti (ed.) Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader, pp. 239-57. Malden, MA: Blackwell .
24.
Heritage, J. ( 1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge : Polity Press.
25.
Heritage, J. ( 2004) ‘Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk: Analyzing Data’, in D. Silverman (ed.) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, pp. 222-45. New York: Sage.
26.
Hutchby, I. ( 2001) ‘"Oh", Irony and Sequential Ambiguity in Arguments’ , Discourse & Society12: 123-41.
27.
Iannello, K.P. ( 1992) Decisions without Hierarchy. New York : Routledge.
28.
Jefferson, G. ( 1984) ‘Notes on Some Orderlinesses of Overlap Onset’ , in V. D’Urso and P. Leonardi (eds) Discourse Analysis and Natural Rhetoric, pp. 11-38. Padua, Italy: Cleup Editore.
29.
Jefferson, G. ( 1985) ‘Notes on a Systematic Development of the Acknowledgement Tokens "Yeah" and ‘‘Mmhm" ’, Papers in Linguistics17: 197-216.
30.
Krüecken, G. ( 2003) ‘Mission Impossible? Institutional Barriers to the Diffusion of the ‘‘Third Academic Mission’’ at German Universities’, International Journal of Technology Management25: 18-33.
31.
Linde, C. ( 1988) ‘Who’s in Charge Here? Cooperative Work and Authority Negotiation in Police Helicopter Missions’, in Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 52-64, Portland, OR.
32.
Lorenzo-Dus, N. ( 2008) ‘Real Disorder in the Court: An Investigation of Conflict Talk in US Television Courtroom Shows’, Media, Culture & Society30: 81-107.
33.
McNeill, D. ( 1992) Hand and Mind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
34.
Menkel-Meadow, C. ( 2003) Dispute Processing and Conflict Resolution. Dartmouth, NH: Ashgate.
35.
Piderit, S.K. ( 2000) ‘Rethinking Resistance and Recognizing Ambivalence: A MultiDimensional View of Attitudes toward an Organizational Change’ , The Academy of Management Review25: 783-94.
36.
Sacks, H. ( 1992) Lectures on ConversationVolume II. Oxford: Blackwell.
37.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A. and Jefferson, G. ( 1974) ‘A Simplest Systematics of the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation’, Language50: 696-735.
38.
Saft, S. ( 2004) ‘Conflict as Interactional Accomplishment in Japan: Arguments in University Faculty Meetings’, Language in Society33: 549-84.
39.
Stivers, T. ( 2004) ‘"No No No" and Other Types of Multiple Sayings in Social Interactions’, Human Communication Research30: 260-93.
40.
Tannenbaum, A.S., Kavčič, B., Rosner, M., Vianello, M. and Wieser, G. ( 1974) Hierarchy in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
