This article discusses the results of an investigation on discourse representation in a corpus of 34 million words constituted by texts in Brazilian Portuguese from two different genres: the research article and the science popularization article. Drawing on a systemic functional grammar perspective of language and pursuing a probabilistic approach, it focuses on the realization of lexicogrammatical systems of direct discourse representation as enacting interpersonal and social relationships. It is argued that the citation practices employed by writers in the genres studied negotiate discursive distance and are influenced by the status culturally and historically ascribed to scientific knowledge.
Alves, F. , Pagan, A. and Magalhães, C. (2004) ‘Towards the Construction of a Multilingual, Multifunctional Corpus: Factors in the Design and Application of CORDIALL’ , TradTerm: Revista do Centro Interdepartamental de tradução e terminologia10: 163-178 .
2.
Biber, D. , Johansson, S. , Leech, G. , Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman .
3.
Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. (1994) ‘On Reporting Reporting: The Representation of Speech in Factual and Factional Narratives’, in M. Coulthard (ed.) Advances in Written Text Analysis, pp. 295-320. London: Routledge .
4.
Calsamiglia, H. and Ferrero, C. L. (2001) ‘Polifonía en textos periodísticos con información científica’ , Lengua, discurso, texto: I Simposio internacional de análisis del discursoV2: 2647-2663 .
5.
Calsamiglia, H. and Ferrero, C. L. (2003) ‘Role and Position of Scientific Voices: Reported Speech in the Media’ , Discourse Studies5(2): 147-173 .
6.
Calsamiglia, H. , Bollina, H. , Cassany, D. , López, C. and Martí, J. (2001) ‘Análisis discursivo de la divulgación científica’ , Lengua, discurso, texto: I Simposio internacional de análisis del discursoV2: 2639-2646 .
7.
Crismore, A. and Farnsworth, R. (1990) ‘Metadiscourse in Popular and Professional Science Discourse’, in W. Nash (ed.) The Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic Discourse, pp. 118-136. London/Newbury Park, CA/New Delhi: Sage .
8.
Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press .
9.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1998) ‘Things and Relations: Regrammaticising Experience as Technical Knowledge’, in J. R. Martin and R. Veel (eds) Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science, pp. 185-235. London/New York: Routledge .
10.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2004) The Language of Science. London/New York: Continuum .
11.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2005) Computational and Quantitative Studies. London/New York: Continuum .
12.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Martin, J. R. (1993) Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London/Washington, DC: University of Pittsburgh Press .
13.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold .
14.
Hyland, K. (1999) ‘Construction of Disciplinary Knowledge’ , Applied Linguistics20(3): 341-367 .
15.
Leech, G. N. and Short, M. H. (1981) Style in Fiction. London: Longman .
16.
Myers, G. (1990) Writing biology: texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. London: University of Wisconsin Press .
17.
Myers, G. (2003) ‘Discourse Studies of Scientific Popularization: Questioning the Boundaries’ , Discourse Studies5(2): 265-279 .
18.
de Oliveira, J.M. (2005) As vozes da ciência: a representa ção do discurso nos gêneros artigo acadêmico e artigo de divulgação científica Unpublished PhD thesis: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, BR.
19.
Orlandi, E.P. (2001) Discurso e Texto: formulação e circulação dos sentidos. São Paulo: Pontes.
20.
Semino, E. and Short, M. (2004) Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Representation in a Corpus of English Writing. London: Routledge .
21.
Swales, J. M. (1985) ‘Citation Analysis and Discourse Analysis’ , Applied Linguistics7(1): 39-56 .
22.
Swales, J. M. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
23.
Swales, J. M. (2004) Research Genres: Exploration and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
24.
Thompson, G. (1996a) Helping Learners with Real English. London: HarperCollins .
25.
Thompson, G. (1996b) ‘Voices in the Text: Discourse Perspectives on Language Reports’ , Applied Linguistics17(4): 501-530 .
26.
Thompson, G. and Ye, Y. (1991) ‘Evaluation in the Reporting Verbs Used in Academic Papers’ , Applied Linguistics12(4): 365-382 .
27.
Zamboni, L.M.S. (2001) Cientistas, jornalistas e divulgação científica: subjetividade e heterogenidade no discurso da divulgação científica. São Paulo: Autores Asociados.
28.
White, P. R. R. (2003) ‘Beyond Modality and Hedging: A Dialogic View of the Language of Intersubjective Stance’ , Text23(2): 259-284 .
