Atran, S. (1996) ‘From Folk Biology to Scientific Biology’, in D.R. Olson and N. Torrance (eds) The Handbook of Education and Human Development, pp. 646–682. Cambridge, MA and Oxford: Blackwell .
2.
Fahnestock, J. (1986) ‘Accommodating Science: The Rhetorical Life of Scientific Facts’ , Written Communication3(3): 275–296 .
3.
Horowitz, R. (1987) ‘Rhetorical Structures in Discourse Processing’, in R. Horowitz and S.J. Samuels (eds) Comprehending Oral and Written Language,pp. 117–160. San Diego, CA and London: Academic Press .
4.
Horowitz, R. (ed.) (in press) Talking Texts. How Speech and Writing Interact in School Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
5.
Horowitz, R. and Freeman, S.H. (1995) ‘Robots versus Spaceships: The Role of Discussion in Kindergartners’ and Second Graders’ Preferences for Science Text’ , The Reading Teacher49(1): 30–40 .
6.
Montgomery, S.L. (2003) The Chicago Guide to Communicating Science. Chicago, IL and London: The University of Chicago Press .
7.
Olson, D.R. (1996) The World on Paper: The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Reading and Writing. Cambridge, MA and Oxford: Cambridge University Press .