The aim of this article is to demonstrate the intricate operation of the adverb `also' in actual interaction at a level of detail that dictionary definitions have failed to capture. Using primarily a conversation analytic framework in examining two data corpora, which include a series of graduate seminar discussions and television roundtable discussions, I argue that the semantic features of `also' are strategically deployed to accomplish complex interactional goals in a disjunctive or disaffiliative environment. In a disjunctive environment, `also' can be invoked to legitimize one's speaking rights - to get the floor. In a disaffiliative environment, `also' can be mobilized to either soften or strengthen a disaffiliative action in subsequent talk. These practices of `also' are accounted for in part by the tensions between coherence and continuation (Linell, 1998; Tracy and Moran, 1983), and in part by the institutional contexts of news media (Dickerson, 2001; Greatbatch, 1992) and graduate seminar (Waring, 2001, 2002 a, b).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Antaki, C. (2002) “Lovely': Turn-Initial High-grade Assessments in Telephone Closings' , Discourse Studies4(1): 5-23 .
2.
Beebe, L.M. and Waring, H.Z. (forthcoming) `Linguistic Encoding of Pragmatic Tone: Adverbials as Words that Work', in D. Boxer and A.D. Cohen (eds) Study Speaking to Inform Second Language Learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters .
3.
Broe, V. (2002) `Grammar in Interaction: The Case of `And Then” , paper presented at the International Conference on Conversation Analysis, Copenhagen, 17-21 May.
4.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987) The Universals of Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
5.
Condon, S.L. (2001) `Discourse Ok Revisited: Default Organization in Verbal Interaction' , Journal of Pragmatics33: 491-513 .
6.
Costello, R.B.et al. (1995) Random House Webster's College Dictionary. New York: Random House .
7.
Craig, R.T. and Sanusi, E. (2000) “I'm Just Saying': Discourse Markers of Standpoint Continuity' , Argumentation14(4): 425-445 .
8.
Dickerson, P. (2001) `Disputing with Care: Analysing Interviewees' Treatment of Interviewers' Prior Turns in Televised Political Interviews' , Discourse Studies3: 203-222 .
9.
Drew, P. (1987) `Po-Faced Receipts of Teases' , Linguistics25: 219-253 .
10.
Erman, B. (2001) `Pragmatic Markers Revisited with a Focus on You Know in Adult and Adolescent Talk' , Journal of Pragmatics3: 1337-1359 .
11.
Fraser, B. (1990) `An Approach to Discourse Markers' , Journal of Pragmatics14: 383-395 .
12.
Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press .
13.
Greatbatch, D. (1992) `On the Management of Disagreement between News Interviewees', in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, pp. 268-301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
14.
Halliday, M. and Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman .
15.
Heritage, J. and Sorjornen, M. (1994) `Constituting and Maintaining Activities across Sequences: And-Prefacing as a Feature of Question Design' , Language in Society23: 1-29 .
16.
Jefferson, G. (1984) `On Stepwise Transition from Talk about a Trouble to Inappropriately Next-Positioned Matters', in M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 191-222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
17.
Kleiner, B. (1998) `Whatever - Its Use in `Pseudo-argument” , Journal of Pragmatics30: 589-613 .
18.
Korolijia, N. and Linell, P. (1996) `Episodes: Coding and Analyzing Coherence in Multiparty Conversation' , Linguistics34: 799-831 .
19.
Koshik, I. (2001) `Wh Questions Used as Challenges' , paper presented at the Convention of the National Communication Association, Atlanta, GA, 1-4 November.
20.
Kothroff, H. (1993) `Disagreement and Concession in Disputes: On the Context Sensitivity of Preference Structures' , Language in Society22: 193-216 .
21.
Lenk, U. (1998) `Discourse Markers and Global Coherence in Conversation' , Journal of Pragmatics30: 245-257 .
22.
Lerner, G. (2001) `The Search for Delicate Formulations: A Social Convention for Collaborative Indiscretion' , paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Sociological Association, Anaheim, CA, August.
23.
Linell, P. (1998) Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins .
24.
Local, J. (2002) “Getting Back to' Prior Talk: and-u(h)m as a Skip-Connecting Device' , paper presented at the International Conference on Conversation Analysis, Copenhagen, 17-21 May.
25.
Maschler, Y. (2002) `The Role of Discourse Markers in the Construction of Multivocality in Israeli Hebrew Talk in Interaction' , Research on Language and Social Interaction35: 1-38 .
26.
Muntigl, P. and Turnbull, W. (1998) `Conversational Structure and Facework in Arguing' , Journal of Pragmatics29: 225-256 .
27.
Oversteegen, L.E. (1997) `On the Pragmatic Nature of Causal and Contrastive Connectives' , Discourse Processes24: 51-85 .
28.
Pomerantz, A. (1984) `Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes', in M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action, pp. 57-101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
29.
Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversation Vol. 2. (ed. G. Jefferson). Oxford: Blackwell .
30.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A. and Jefferson, G. (1974) `A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation' , Language50: 696-735 .
31.
Schegloff, E.A. (1984) `On Some Questions and Ambiguities in Conversation', in M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Interaction, pp. 266-296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
32.
Schiffrin, D. (1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
33.
Schiffrin, D. (2001) `Discourse Markers: Language, Meaning and Context', in D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen and H.E. Hamilton (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, pp. 54-75. Oxford: Blackwell .
34.
Schourup, L. (2001) `Rethinking Well` , Journal of Pragmatics33: 1025-1060 .
35.
Stubbs, M. (1983) Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell .
36.
Tracy, K. (1984) `Staying on Topic: An Explication of Conversational Relevance' , Discourse Processes7: 447-464 .
37.
Tracy, K. (1997) Colloquium: Dilemmas of Academic Discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex .
38.
Tracy, K. and Moran, J.P. (1983) `Conversational Relevance in Multiple-Goal Settings', in R.T. Craig and K. Tracy (eds) Conversational Coherence, pp. 116-135. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
39.
Waring, H.Z. (2001) `Balancing the Competing Interests in Seminar Discussion: Peer Referencing and Asserting Vulnerability' , Issues in Applied Linguistics12(1): 29-50 .
40.
Waring, H.Z. (2002a) `Expressing Noncomprehension in Seminar Discussion' , Journal of Pragmatics34: 1711-1731 .
41.
Waring, H.Z. (2002b) `Displaying Understanding through Substantive Recipiency' , Research on Language and Social Interaction35(4): 453-480 .
42.
Wong, J. (2000) `The Token `Yeah' in Nonnative Speaker English Conversation' , Research on Language and Social Interaction33(1): 39-67 .
