This article reports some findings from a study of verbal interaction from sittings between members of the public and mediums: people who claim to be able to talk to the dead on behalf of the living. Instead of trying to debunk the ontological status of the mediums' claimed powers and the existence of the afterlife, the article examines mediums' discourse as a form of institutional interaction. It focuses on instances in which mediums report the words of their spirit contacts in their sittings with clients. It is argued that this is a key practice by which mediums establish the basis of a favourable assessment of the authenticity of their powers. The analysis examines the recurrent organizational properties of utterances in which the spirits' words are introduced into the sitting, and describes some of the inferential or rhetorical tasks addressed by these reports.
Best, J.E. (1991) Link and Communique: A Personal Psychic Experience. London: Regency Press.
2.
Buttny, R. (1998) `Putting Prior Talk into Context: Reported Speech and Reporting Context', Research on Language and Social Interaction31(1): 45-58.
3.
Buttny, R. and Williams, P.L. (2000) `Demanding Respect: The Uses of Reported Speech in Discursive Constructions of Interracial Contact', Discourse & Society11(1): 109-133.
4.
Christopher, M. (1970) ESP, Seers and Psychics: What the Occult Really Is. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
5.
Christopher, M. (1975) Mediums, Mystics and the Occult. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
6.
Clayman, S.E. (1992) `Footing in the Achievement of Neutrality: The Case of News Interview Discourse', in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk At Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, pp. 163-198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Coulmas, F. (1986) `Reported Speech: Some General Issues', in F. Coulmas (ed.) Direct and Indirect Speech, pp. 1-28. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
8.
Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (1992) Talk At Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Ellison, S. (1988) The Reality of the Paranormal. London: Harrap.
10.
Gauld, A. (1983) Mediumship and Survival: A Century of Investigations. London: Paladin Books.
11.
Goffman, E. (1981) `Footing', in E. Goffman (ed.) Forms of Talk, pp. 124-159. Oxford: Blackwell.
12.
Heritage, J. (1997) `Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk: Analysing Data', in D. Silverman (ed.) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, pp. 161-182. London: Sage.
13.
Heritage, J. and Greatbatch, D. (1991) `On the Institutional Character of Institutional Talk: The Case of News Interviews', in D. Boden and D. Zimmerman (eds) Talk and Social Structure, pp. 93-137. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
Holt, E. (1996) `Reporting on Talk: The Use of Direct Reported Speech in Conversation', Research on Language and Social Interaction29(3): 219-245.
15.
Hutchby, I. and Wooffitt, R. (1998) Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications. Oxford: Polity Press.
16.
Hyman, R. (1981) ` “Cold Reading”: How to Convince Strangers That You Know All about Them', in K. Frazier (ed.) Paranormal Borderlands of Science, pp. 79-96. Prometheus Books: New York.
17.
Jefferson, G. (1989) `Notes on a Possible Metric for a Standard Maximum Silence of Approximately One Second in Conversation', in D. Roger and P. Bull (eds) Conversation: an Interdisciplinary Perspective, pp. 166-196. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
18.
Keen, M. , Ellison, A. and Fontana, D. (1999) `The Scole Report', Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research58(220): 151-392.
19.
Lehrer, A. (1989) `Remembering and Representing Prose: Quoted Speech as a Data Source', Discourse Processes12: 105-125.
20.
Leudar, I. (1998) `Who is Martin McGuiness? On Contextualizing Reported Political Talk', in S. Cmejrkovaet al. (ed.) Dialogue Analysis 6, Vol. 2, pp. 217-224. Tubingen: Niemeyer.
21.
Li, C.N. (1986) `Direct and Indirect Speech: A Functional Study', in F. Coulmas (ed.) Direct and Indirect Speech, pp. 29-46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
22.
Mayes, P. (1990) `Quotation in Spoken English', Studies in Language14(2): 325-363.
23.
Myers, G. (1999) `Functions of Reported Speech in Group Discussions', Applied Linguistics20(3): 376-401.
24.
O'Brien, S. (1992) In Touch With Eternity: Contact With Another World. London: Bantam Books.
25.
Phillips, S.U. (1986) `Reported Speech as Evidence in an American Trial', in D. Tannen and J.E. Alatis (eds) Languages and Linguistics: The Interdependence of Theory, Data and Application, pp. 154-170. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1985. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
26.
Potter, J. (1996) Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage.
27.
Randi, J. (1981) `Cold Reading Revisited', in K. Frazier (ed.) Paranormal Borderlands of Science, pp. 106-110. New York: Prometheus Books.
28.
Roe, C.A. (1995) `Pseudopsychics and the Barnum Effect', European Journal of Parapsychology11: 76-91.
29.
Schegloff, E.A. (1988) `Goffman and the Analysis of Conversation', in P. Drew and T. Wootton (eds) Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, pp. 89-135. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30.
Spiritualists National Union website (2000) http://www.snu.org.uk/index2.htm
31.
Tannen, D. (1986) `Introducing Constructed Dialogue in Greek and American Conversational and Literary Narrative', in F. Coulmas (ed.) Direct and Indirect Speech, pp. 311-332. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
32.
Wooffitt, R. (1992) Telling Tales of the Unexpected: The Organisation of Factual Discourse. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
33.
Wooffitt, R. (2000) `Some Properties of the Interactional Organisation of Displays of Paranormal Cognition in Psychic-Sitter Interaction', Sociology43(3): 457-479.
34.
Wooffitt, R. (2001, in press) `A Socially Organised Basis for Displays of Cognition: Procedural Orientation to Evidential Turns in Psychic-Sitter Interaction', British Journal of Social Psychology.
