Two college-age samples, one from the United States (Washington, DC) and one from Spain (Madrid), were studied with mixed methods, phenomenological (with qualitative analyses) and traditional experimental (with quantitative analyses) - regarding the alleged foundational topic of `unfairness'. Participants gave their instantiations of `It's not fair!' (`No es justo'), which were deconstructed and qualitatively analyzed to find and compare the essential types of unfairness. Using traditional experimental methods, unfairness vignettes were rated by severity and quantitatively analyzed, to see whether the two cultural groups make similar or different distinctions among the concepts of `unfairness', `injustice' and `misfortune'. From qualitative analyses, the fairness principles of `equity' and `equality' appeared in both groups, but `honor and dignity' violations were much more frequent in the Spanish group, as different fairness principles interacted in complex ways. From the quantitative analyses, `unfairness' was the broadest of the three concepts, extending beyond `injustice' and both cultural groups viewed `misfortunes' as `unfairnesses'. Implications for a commonsense morality across cultures are discussed.
Bierbrauer, G. (1994) `Toward an Understanding of Legal Culture: Variations in Individualism and Collectivism between Kurds, Lebanese, and Germans', Law & Society Review28: 243-264.
2.
Blankenburg, E. (1994) `The Infrastructure for Avoiding Civil Litigation: Comparing Cultures of Legal Behavior in the Netherlands and West Germany', Law & Society Review28: 789-808.
3.
Butterfield, F. (1995) All God's Children: The Bosket Family and the American Tradition of Violence. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
4.
Chapman, J.W. (1963) `Justice and Fairness', in C.J. Friedrich and J.W. Chapman (eds) Nomos VI: Justice. New York: Atherton Press.
5.
Coles, R. (1986) The Moral Life of Children. Boston, MA: The Atlantic Monthly Press.
6.
Coles, R. (1990) The Spiritual Life of Children. Boston, MA: Houghton Miflin.
7.
Coles, R. (1997) The Moral Intelligence of Children. New York: Random House.
8.
Deutsch, M. (1985) Distributive Justice: A Social Psychological Perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.
9.
Diaz-Plaja, F. (1967) The Spaniard and the Seven Deadly Sins, trans. by J.I. Palmer. New York: Scribner.
10.
Dworkin, R. (1978) Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
Finkel, N.J. (1995) Commonsense Justice: Jurors' Notions of the Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Finkel, N.J. (1996) `Culpability and Commonsense Justice: Lessons Learned Betwixt Murder and Madness', Notre Dame Journal of Law Ethics & Public Policy10: 101-154.
13.
Finkel, N.J. (in press a) `But it's not Fair!: Commonsense Notions of Unfairness', Psychology, Public Policy, and Law.
14.
Finkel, N.J. (in press b) Not fair!: The Typology of Commonsense Unfairness. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15.
Finkel, N.J. and Sales, B.D. (1997) `Commonsense Justice: Old Roots, Germinant Ground, and New Shoots', Psychology, Public Policy, and Law3: 1-15.
16.
Finkel, N.J. , Crystal, D.S. and Watanabe, H. (in press) `But it's not Fair!: Commonsense Notions of Unfairness in Japan and the United States', Psychology, Public Policy, and Law.
17.
Finkel, N.J. , Malony, S.T., Valbuena, M.Z. and Groscup, J.L. (1995) `Lay Perspectives on Legal Conundrums: Impossible and Mistaken Act Cases', Law and Human Behavior19: 593-608.
18.
Garland, D. (1990) Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Gibson, J.L. (1989) `Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance', Law & Society Review23: 469-496.
20.
Gibson, J.L. (1991) `Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Compliance with Supreme Court Decisions: A Question of Causality', Law & Society Review25: 631-635.
21.
Gibson, J.L. and Caldeira, G.A. (1996) `The Legal Cultures of Europe', Law & Society Review30: 55-85.
22.
Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
23.
Gove, P.B. (1981) Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged. Springfield, MA: G. & C. Merriam Company.
24.
Haney, C. (1991) `The Fourteenth Amendment and Symbolic Legality: Let Them Eat Due Process', Law and Human Behavior15: 183-204.
25.
Harré, R. (1998) `Emotion across Cultures', Innovation11: 43-52.
26.
Hart, H.L.A. (1961) The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
27.
Heider, F. (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
28.
Homans, G.C. (1961) Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt.
29.
Homans, G.C. (1982) `Forward', in J. Greenberg and R.L. Cohen (eds) Equity and Justice in Social Behavior. New York: Academic Press.
30.
Jones, E.E. , Kanouse, D.E., Kelley, H.H., Nisbett, R.E., Valins, S. and Weiner, B. (1972) Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
31.
Kidder, L.H. and Muller, S. (1991) `What is “Fair” in Japan?', in H. Steensma and R. Vermunt (eds) Social Justice in Human Relations (Vol. 2): Societal and Psychological Consequences of Justice and Injustice, pp. 139-154. New York: Plenum Press.
32.
Lerner, M. (1980) The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion. New York: Plenum Press.
33.
Lind, E.A. and Tyler, T.R. (1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.
34.
Marsh, P. , Rosser, E. and Harré, R. (1977) The Rules of Disorder. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
35.
Masuda, K. (1987) Kenkyusha's Japanese-English Dictionary, rev. edn.Tokyo: Kenkyusha.
36.
Merry, S.E. (1990) Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-class Americans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
Messick, D.M. and Cook, K.S. (eds) (1983) Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives. New York: Praeger.
38.
Miller, J.G. (1984) `Culture and the Development of Everyday Social Explanation', Journal of Personality and Soical Psychology46: 961-978.
39.
Miller, J.G. and Bersoff, D.M. (1992) `Culture and Moral Judgement: How are Conflicts between Justice and Friendship Resolved?', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology62: 541-554.
40.
Miller, J.G. , Bersoff, D.M. and Harwood, R.L. (1990) `Perceptions of “Social Responsibility” in India and in the United States: Moral Imperatives or Personal Decisions?', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology58: 33-47.
41.
Mitchell, L.E. (1998) Stacked Deck: A Story of Selfishness in America. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
42.
Mondak, J.L. (1993) `Institutional Legitimacy and Procedural Justice: Reexamining the Question of Causality', Law & Society Review27: 599-608.
43.
Nisbett, R.E. and Cohen, D. (1996) Culture of Honor: The Psychology of Violence in the South. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
44.
Rawls, J. (1958) `Justice as Fairness', Philosophical Review67: 164-194.
45.
Rawls, J. (1963) `Constitutional Liberty and the Concept of Justice', in C.J. Friedrich and J.W. Chapman (eds) Nomos VI: Justice, pp. 98-125. New York: Atherton Press.
46.
Rosen, L. (1989) The Anthropology of Justice: Law as Culture in Islamic Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Segall, M.H. , Lonner, W.J. and Berry, J.W. (1998) `Cross-cultural Psychology as a Scholarly Discipline: On the Flowering of Culture in Behavioral Research', American Psychologist53: 1101-1110.
48.
Shklar, J.N. (1990) The Faces of Injustice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
49.
Silbey, S.S. (1997) “`Let Them Eat Cake”: Globalization, Postmodern Colonialism, and the Possibilities of Justice', Law & Society Review31: 207-235.
50.
Simon, T.W. (1995) `A Theory of Social Injustice', in D.S. Caudill and S.J. Gold (eds) Radical Philosophy of Law: Contemporary Challenges to Mainsteam Legal Theory and Practice, pp. 54-72. New Jersey: Humanities Press.
51.
Stern, W. (1924) Psychology of Early Childhood up to the Sixth Year of Age. New York: Henry Holt.
52.
Thibaut, J.W. and Walker, L. (1975) Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53.
Todd, Z. (2000) Mixing Methods. London: Routledge.
54.
Tyler, T.R. (1990) Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
55.
Tyler, T.R. (1994) `Governing amid Diversity: The Effect of Fair Decisionmaking Procedures on the Legitimacy of Government', Law & Society Review28: 809-831.
56.
Tyler, T.R. and Rasinski, K. (1991) `Procedural Justice, Institutional Legitimacy, and the Acceptance of Unpopular US Supreme Court Decisions: A Reply to Gibson', Law & Society Review25: 621-630.
57.
Walster, E. , Walster, G.W. and Berscheid, E. (1978) Equity, Theory, and Research. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
58.
Weinreb, L.L. (1987) Natural Law and Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59.
Wolgast, E.H. (1987) The Grammar of Justice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
60.
Wrightsman, L.S. , Nietzel, M.T. and Fortune, W.H. (1994) Psychology and the Legal System, 3rd edn.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
