This study examines how TikTok functions as an agent of consumer socialization and facilitates intergenerational knowledge exchange within families. Drawing on 20 in-depth interviews with adolescents aged 11–16, the study investigates how they acquire, interpret, and transmit consumer knowledge via TikTok’s platform design, focusing on what they learn, how they learn, from whom, why they engage, and how they pass this knowledge on to their parents. The findings reveal three key insights. First, TikTok serves as a dynamic site of consumer learning, where adolescents develop transactional knowledge, advertising literacy, and consumption motives through peer-generated content. Second, TikTok’s algorithmic and interactive features allow adolescents to verify and negotiate the credibility of information through peer feedback and participatory practices. Third, adolescents function as informal educators within their families, transferring platform-based expertise through spontaneous and deliberate exchanges. These insights advance consumer socialization theory by reframing adolescents as situated experts whose digital literacies shape intergenerational learning in the platform age.
AlmoqbelMAlrassiJAlzahraniS, et al. (2025) From an entertaining app to a search engine: A case of user-generated innovation in social media platforms. Telematics and Informatics Reports18: 100195.
2.
AzungahT (2018) Qualitative research: Deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. Qualitative Research Journal18(4): 383–400.
3.
BanduraA (2014) Social-cognitive theory. In: EwenRB (ed.) An Introduction to Theories of Personality. Psychology Press, pp.341–360.
4.
BanduraAWaltersRH (1977) Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5.
BrønholtT (2020) Gated communities of the digitised mind. In: GalliottJMacnishK (eds) Big Data and Democracy. Edinburgh University Press, pp.104–118.
6.
ChaudharySDeyAK (2024) Mediating effect of materialism on the relationship between socialization and consumer decision-making styles. FIIB Business Review13(5): 542–552.
7.
de AlmeidaJOLugosiPQuintonS (2025) Child viewers’ engagement with social media influencers: Exercising socialisation-driven agency. Journal of Business Research200: 115590.
8.
De JansSVan de SompelDDe VeirmanM, et al. (2020) # Sponsored! How the recognition of sponsoring on Instagram posts affects adolescents’ brand evaluations through source evaluations. Computers in Human Behavior109: 106342.
9.
De LeynTDe WolfRVanden AbeeleM, et al. (2022) In-between child’s play and teenage pop culture: Tweens, TikTok & privacy. Journal of Youth Studies25(8): 1108–1125.
10.
DhondtBVan de SompelDHuddersL (2025) Becoming competent consumers: Exploring the dynamics of the consumer socialization process between parents and their adolescents. Journal of Consumer Affairs59(2): e70012.
11.
GaleNKHeathGCameronE, et al. (2013) Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology13: 1–8.
12.
GentinaEMuratoreI (2012) Environmentalism at home: The process of ecological resocialization by teenagers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour11(2): 162–169.
13.
HendrickxJ (2025) ‘Normal news is boring’: How young adults encounter and experience news on Instagram and TikTok. New Media & Society27(10): 5736–5754.
14.
HindujaSLalaniF (2025) Empowering and Protecting European Youth Online: Streamlining Legislation and Promoting Positive Digital Experiences. Cyberbullying Research Center. Available at: https://cyberbullying.org/empowering
15.
HotaMBartschF (2019) Consumer socialization in childhood and adolescence: Impact of psychological development and family structure. Journal of Business Research105: 11–20.
16.
HuneitiKS (2025) The influence of media on children’s psychological development and consumer behavior. In: HamdanRK (ed.) Tech Fusion in Business and Society: Harnessing Big Data, IoT, and Sustainability in Business: Volume 2. Springer, pp.359–370.
17.
JainPArakkalJ (2022) Perceived popularity of TikTok among Gen-Z. Cardiometry24: 896–902.
18.
JohnDR (1999) Consumer socialization of children: A retrospective look at twenty-five years of research. Journal of Consumer Research26(3): 183–213.
19.
JohnDR (2018) Stages of consumer socialization: The development of consumer knowledge, skills, and values from childhood to adolescence. In: HaugtvedtCPHerrPMKardesFR (eds) Handbook of Consumer Psychology. Taylor and Francis, pp.221–246.
20.
JohnDRChaplinLN (2022) Children as consumers: A review of 50 years of research in marketing. In: KahleLRLowreyTMHuberJ (eds) APA Handbook of Consumer Psychology. American Psychological Association, pp.185–202.
21.
KayeDBVChenXZengJ (2021) The co-evolution of two Chinese mobile short video apps: Parallel platformization of Douyin and TikTok. Mobile Media & Communication9(2): 229–253.
22.
LaveJWengerE (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.
23.
LaviM (2023) Targeting children: Liability for algorithmic recommendations. American University Law Review73: 1367.
24.
LeeJAbidinCLeaverT (2025) TikTok and children: An introduction. International Journal of Cultural Studies28(5): 893–906.
25.
LiuJChenQDangJ (2022) New intergenerational evidence on reverse socialization of environmental literacy. Sustainability Science17(6): 2543–2555.
26.
LivingstoneS (2014) Developing social media literacy: How children learn to interpret risky opportunities on social network sites. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research39(3): 283–303.
27.
LivingstoneSÓlafssonKHelsperEJ, et al. (2017) Maximizing opportunities and minimizing risks for children online: The role of digital skills in emerging strategies of parental mediation. Journal of Communication67(1): 82–105.
28.
LuXLuZLiuC (2020) Exploring TikTok use and non-use practices and experiences in China. In: MeiselwitzG (ed.) International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, pp.57–70.
29.
MensonidesDVan CauwenbergeASwartJ, et al. (2025) TikTok as a peer playground: Understanding how children in middle childhood use TikTok to shape their peer relations. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 26 August 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251362690
30.
MishraAMaityM (2021) Influence of parents, peers, and media on adolescents’ consumer knowledge, attitudes, and purchase behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Behaviour20(6): 1675–1689.
31.
MishraAShuklaARoyR (2026) Fifty years of consumer socialization research: A structural topic modeling approach and future research agenda. Journal of Consumer Marketing43: 257–272.
32.
NguyenHDiederichM (2023) Facilitating knowledge construction in informal learning: A study of TikTok scientific, educational videos. Computers & Education205: 104896.
ParkJChunJ (2025) The consumer socialization process: How social media affects youth luxury consumption. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing16(2): 156–172.
35.
PrendergastKDyerE (2026) Youth social media age restrictions: Examining Trans-Tasman media coverage of Australia’s social media ‘ban’. Journal of Youth Studies. Epub ahead of print 5 February 2026. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2026.2626495
36.
RasmussenEERiggsRESauermilchWS (2022) Kidfluencer exposure, materialism, and US tweens’ purchase of sponsored products. Journal of Children and Media16(1): 68–77.
37.
RossingBE (1991) Patterns of informal incidental learning: Insights from community action. International Journal of Lifelong Education10(1): 45–60.
38.
RuggieroTE (2000) Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society3(1): 3–37.
39.
SigirciOGegezAEAytimurH, et al. (2022) Children in marketing: A review, synthesis and research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies46(5): 1594–1639.
40.
SinghPSahadevSOatesCJ, et al. (2020) Pro-environmental behavior in families: A reverse socialization perspective. Journal of Business Research115: 110–121.
41.
TongASainsburyPCraigJ (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care19(6): 349–357.
42.
TurvyAAbidinC (2025) Patchwork governance on KidTok: Balancing regulation and community norms. Policy & Internet17(2): e70003.
43.
VanwynsbergheHVan DammeKPeetersH, et al. (2024) Onderzoeksrapport apenstaartjaren : de digitale leefwereld van kinderen en jongeren. Mediaraven.
44.
VaterlausJMWinterM (2025) TikTok: An exploratory study of young adults’ uses and gratifications. The Social Science Journal62(3): 613–632.
45.
Virós-MartínCMontaña-BlascoMJiménez-MoralesM (2024) Can’t stop scrolling! Adolescents’ patterns of TikTok use and digital well-being self-perception. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications11: 1444.
46.
WhelanB (2025) The impact of childhood socioeconomic status on consumer preferences for private label brands. Journal of Marketing Analytics. Epub ahead of print 14 August 2025. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-025-00429-z
47.
YoussefEAl MalekM (2023) Investigating the impact of social media platforms use among children on formal and informal learning: From the uses and gratifications theory perspective. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development8(1): 3026.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
