Balancing moral,financial,and legal considerations: How practitioners in the game industry justify spending on accessibility

Abstract

As the global game industry expands, accessibility for players with disabilities has become a growing concern. Implementing accessibility is mostly technologically feasible, yet it remains scarce. This study investigates how practitioners justify accessibility spending in an industry marked by rapid growth, weak regulation, and platform pressures. Drawing on a mixed-method survey of 272 professionals, we identify three decision-making strategies: proactive (morally driven), rational (profit-driven), and reactive (compliance-oriented). The proactive strategy was associated with relatively higher accessibility spending, and non-male participants showed a higher likelihood of supporting accessibility. The findings highlight the ethical, economic, and organizational tensions professionals navigate in digitized or platform-intensive industries. The findings contribute to research on ethical decision-making and creative labor by theorizing on how moral, financial, and legal considerations intersect within digitized or platformized industries.

Keywords

Accessibility disability ethical decision-making game design game industry gender differences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Access-Ability (2024) Video games need accessibility standards: 2024. Access-Ability, 5 January. Available at: https://access-ability.uk/2024/01/05/video-games-need-accessibility-standards-2024/ (accessed 27 January 2025).

Anderson

(2023) Video game accessibility defined through advocacy: how the websites AbleGamers.org and CanIPlayThat.com use the word accessibility. Games and Culture 19(5): 571–586.

Anderson

(2024) The ground floor approach to video game accessibility: identifying design features prioritized by accessibility reviews. Games and Culture 20(6): 748–759.

Arkan

Nagpal

Scharding

, et al. (2023) Don’t just trust your gut: the importance of normative deliberation to ethical decision-making at work. Journal of Business Ethics 186: 257–277.

Arora

(2023) The gaming industry: a behemoth with unprecedented global reach. Forbes, 17 November. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesagencycouncil/2023/11/17/the-gaming-industry-a-behemoth-with-unprecedented-global-reach/ (accessed 30 April 2025).

Baltzar

Hassan

Turunen

(2023) “It’s easier to play alone”: a survey study of gaming with disabilities. Journal of Electronic Gaming and Esports 1(1): jege2022–0029.

Baltzar

Turunen

Hassan

(2022) Popular accessibility settings in digital games: what accessibility settings do players with disabilities use and need? In: Academic Mindtrek ‘22: Proceedings of the 25th international academic Mindtrek conference, Tampere, 16–18 November 2022, pp. 359–363. New York: ACM.

Barker

Pistrang

(2012) Research Methods in Clinical Psychology: An Introduction for Students and Practitioners. John Wiley & Sons.

Birkinshaw

(2024) Too little, too late? How policymakers and regulators respond to the business model innovations of digital firms. Academy of Management Perspectives 38(3): 269–285.

10.

Brislin

(1980) Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In: Triandis

Berry

(eds) Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Vol. 2. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, pp. 349–444.

11.

Brown

Anderson

(2020) Designing for disability: evaluating the state of accessibility design in video games. Games & Culture 16(6): 702–718.

12.

Burns

CJM

Houghton

Delaney

, et al. (2023) Ethical decision-making in indigenous financial services: QSuper case study. Journal of Business Ethics 186: 13–29.

13.

Cairns

Power

Barlet

, et al. (2021) Enabled players: the value of accessible digital games. Games and Culture 16(2): 262–282.

14.

Chess

Shaw

(2015) A conspiracy of fishes, or, how we learned to stop worrying about #GamerGate and embrace hegemonic masculinity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 59(1): 208–220.

15.

Collewet

Koster

(2023) Preference estimation from point allocation experiments. Journal of Choice Modelling 48: 100430.

16.

Diaz

(2023) Video games are becoming more accessible — and games are better for it. Polygon. Available at: https://www.polygon.com/gaming/23581909/video-game-disability-accessibility-xbox-god-of-war (accessed 27 January 2025).

17.

Dubois

L-E

Weststar

(2022) Games-as-a-service: conflicted identities on the new front-line of video game development. New Media & Society 24(10): 2332–2353.

18.

Entertainment Software Association (n.d.) Inclusion & belonging. Available at: https://www.theesa.com/issues/inclusion-belonging/ (accessed 1 February 2025).

19.

Flannery

May

(2000) Environmental ethical decision making in the U.S. metal-finishing industry. Academy of Management Journal 43(4): 642–662.

20.

Ford

Richardson

(1994) Ethical decision making: a review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics 13: 205–221.

21.

Gioia

Corley

Hamilton

(2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods 16(1): 15–31.

22.

Greene

Sommerville

Nystrom

, et al. (2001) An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 293(5537): 2105–2108.

23.

Guarnieri

Trojan

(2019) Decision making on supplier selection based on social, ethical, and environmental criteria: a study in the textile industry. Resources, Conversation and Recycling 141: 347–361.

24.

Hamilton

(2016) Mobile devices and disabled gamers. GDC Vault. Available at: https://www.gdcvault.com/play/1023361/Mobile-Devices-and-Disabled

25.

Harviainen

Paavilainen

Koskinen

(2020) Ayn Rand’s objectivist ethics applied to video game business. Journal of Business Ethics 167: 761–774.

26.

Hassan

(2023) Accessibility of games and game-based applications: a systematic literature review and mapping of future directions. New Media & Society 26(4): 2336–2384.

27.

Hassan

Buttler

Vesa

(2024) Games, business, and gamers: how to facilitate a game accessibility transition across the gaming ecosystem? In: Lehtimäki

Taylor

Lyra

(eds) Art and Sustainability Transitions in Business and Society: Theoretical Insights and Engagement. Cham: Springer. pp. 79–108.

28.

Heimo

Harviainen

Kimppa

, et al. (2018) Virtual to virtuous money: a virtue ethics perspective on video game business logic. Journal of Business Ethics 153: 95–103.

29.

IGN (2022) Noteworthy advancement in game accessibility in 2022. IGN, 3 December. Available at: https://www.ign.com/articles/noteworthy-advancement-game-accessibility-2022 (accessed 7 February 2023).

30.

International Game Developers Association (2022) Developer satisfaction survey 2021. Diversity in the Game Industry Report. Available at: https://igda-website.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/15161607/IGDA-DSS-2021-Diversity-Report_Final.pdf

31.

Jones

(1991) Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: an issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review 16: 366–395.

32.

Kahn

Wolfe

Quinn

, et al. (1964) Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

33.

Kant

Gregor

(1996) Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

34.

Karlsson

Brusk

Engström

(2022) Level design processes and challenges: a cross section of game development. Games and Culture 18(6): 821–849.

35.

Katz

Kahn

(1978) Organizations and the System Concept. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

36.

Keogh

Hardwick

(2023) Creative, technical, entrepreneurial: formative tensions in game development higher education. Games and Culture 19(6): 804–826.

37.

King

(2025) App user acquisition costs (2025). Business of Apps, 27 August. Available at: https://www.businessofapps.com/marketplace/user-acquisition/research/user-acquisition-costs/ (accessed 27 January 2025).

38.

Kohlberg

(1969) Stage and sequence: the cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In: Goslin

(ed.) Handbook of Socialization: Theory and Research. Rosemont, IL: Rand McNally, pp. 347–480.

39.

Kohlberg

(1981) Essays in Moral Development: The Philosophy of Moral Development. Vol. 1. New York: Harper and Row.

40.

Larreina-Morales

(2023) How accessible is this video game? An analysis tool in two steps. Games and Culture 19(1): 75–93.

41.

Lehnert

Park

Y-h

Singh

(2015) Research note and review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: boundary conditions and extensions. Journal of Business Ethics 129: 195–219.

42.

Lehtonen

Gustafsson

Hassan

(2023a) The multiplex of value creation and capture logics in the video game industry: an integrative review of 20 years of studies and a future research agenda. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 195: 122756.

43.

Lehtonen

Harviainen

Kultima

(2023b) How monetization mechanisms in mobile games influence consumers’ identity extensions. Service Business 17: 113–136.

44.

Lehtonen

Vesa

Harviainen

(2022) Games-as-a-disservice: emergent value co-destruction in platform business models. Journal of Business Research 141: 564–574.

45.

Loe

Ferrell

Mansfield

(2000) A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. Journal of Business Ethics 25: 185–204.

46.

McKinney

Emerson

Neubert

(2010) The effects of ethical codes on ethical perceptions of actions toward stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics 97(4): 505–516.

47.

Marley

AAJ

Louviere

(2005) Some probabilistic models of best, worst, and best–worst choices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 49(6): 464–480.

48.

Microsoft (2023) Xbox accessibility guidelines V3.2. Microsoft, 3 June. Available at: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/gaming/accessibility/guidelines (accessed 27 January 2025).

49.

Mortaloni

(2023) Xbox celebrates the disability communities with new accessibility updates. Xbox Wire, 18 May. Available at: https://news.xbox.com/en-us/2023/05/18/xbox-celebrates-commitment-to-accessibility/#:~:text=Improved%20Xbox.com%20Experience&text=A%20new%20update%20on%20the,with%20over%2017%20supported%20languages (accessed 30 April 2025).

50.

Murphy

Zagal

(2011) Videogames and the ethics of care. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations 3(3): 69–81.

51.

Nieborg

(2021) Apps of empire: global capitalism and the app economy. Games and Culture 16(3): 305–316.

52.

Nieborg

Poell

(2018) The platformization of cultural production: theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society 20(11): 4275–4292.

53.

O’Fallon

Butterfield

(2005) A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics 59: 375–413.

54.

Ozalp

Ozcan

Dinckol

, et al. (2022) “Digital colonization” of highly regulated industries: an analysis of big tech platforms’ entry into health care and education. California Management Review 64(4): 78–107.

55.

Paaßen

Morgenroth

Stratemeyer

(2017) What is a true gamer? The male gamer stereotype and the marginalization of women in video game culture. Sex Roles 76(7): 421–435.

56.

Peer

Brandimarte

Samat

, et al. (2017) Beyond the Turk: alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 70: 153–163.

57.

Petrovskaya

Zendle

(2022) Predatory monetisation? A categorisation of unfair, misleading and aggressive monetisation techniques in digital games from the player perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 181: 1065–1081.

58.

Pinsonneault

Kraemer

(1993) Survey research methodology in management information systems: an assessment. Journal of Management Information Systems 10(2): 75–105.

59.

Poell

Nieborg

Duffy

(2022) Platforms and Cultural Production. Cambridge: Polity Press.

60.

Porter

Kientz

(2013) An empirical study of issues and barriers to mainstream video game accessibility. In: Proceedings of the 15th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility, Bellevue, WA, 21–23 October 2013, pp. 1–8. New York: ACM.

61.

Rest

(1986) Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. Westport, CT: Praeger.

62.

Rietveld

Eggers

(2018) Demand heterogeneity in platform markets: implications for complementors. Organization Science 29(2): 304–322.

63.

Schwartz

(2016) Ethical decision-making theory: an integrated approach. Journal of Business Ethics 139: 755–776.

64.

Shaffer

Reiche

Dimitrova

, et al. (2016) Work-and family-role adjustment of different types of global professionals: scale development and validation. Journal of International Business Studies 47(2): 113–139.

65.

Simon

(1987) Making management decisions: the role of intuition and emotion. Academy of Management Perspectives 1(1): 57–64.

66.

Sinclair

(2019) Ubisoft sees high acceptance for opt-out subtitles. GamesIndustry.biz, 26 June. Available at: https://www.gamesindustry.biz/ubisoft-sees-high-acceptance-for-opt-out-subtitles

67.

Slote

(2007) The Ethics of Care and Empathy. London: Routledge.

68.

Sony Interactive Entertainment (n.d.) Accessibility. Available at: https://sonyinteractive.com/en/impact/accessibility/?utm_source=chatgpt.com (accessed 27 January 2025).

69.

Tandon

Dhir

Kaur

, et al. (2025) Ethical sourcing and decision making in the fashion industry: a longitudinal qualitative examination. Journal of Business Ethics 196: 723–751.

70.

Trevino

(1992) Moral reasoning and business ethics: implications for research, education, and management. Journal of Business Ethics 11: 445–459.

71.

Warner

Fortin

Melkonian

(2022) When are we more ethical? A review and categorization of the factors influencing dual-process ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics 189: 843–882.

72.

Weber

(1990) Managers moral reasoning: assessing their responses to three moral dilemmas. Human Relations 43(7): 687–702.

73.

Weber

(1992) Scenarios in business ethics research: review, critical assessment, and recommendations. Business Ethics Quarterly 2(2): 137–160.

74.

Xie

Zhang

Gao

, et al. (2023) Are callings always ethically good? Why and when occupational calling inhibits unethical decision-making among researchers. Journal of Business Ethics 191: 357–372.

75.

Yuan

Folmer

Harris

, et al. (2011) Game accessibility: a survey. Universal Access in the Information Society 10(1): 81–100.