The rise of digital Islam has opened organic spaces in which Muslims learn, debate, and live their faith online, reshaping how religious influence and credibility emerge. While professional influencers often dominate digital religious spaces, everyday influencers, lacking formal religious authority yet embedded in close peer networks, play a crucial role in shaping religious practice. Drawing on 40 in‑depth semi‑structured interviews conducted between November 2024 and February 2025 in Egypt, Morocco, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates, this article engages Campbell’s framework of networked religion as a point of dialogue rather than a fixed model. We propose the concept of liquid authority to explain how religious credibility emerges through trust, relational proximity, and algorithmic visibility in digital contexts. Findings show that social media complements rather than replaces traditional religious practice. While formal scholars remain central to institutional authority, algorithmically mediated and peer‑embedded forms of authority increasingly shape lived religious practice.
AbidinC (2016) Visibility labour: engaging with influencers’ fashion brands and #OOTD advertorial campaigns on Instagram. Media International Australia161(1): 86–100.
2.
ArmfieldGGHolbertRL (2003) The relationship between religiosity and internet use. Journal of Media and Religion3(2): 129–144.
3.
AzadH (2017) Thinking about Islam, politics and Muslim identity in a digital age. Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies2: 122–134.
BuntG (2018) Hashtag Islam: How Cyber-Islamic Environments are Transforming Religious Authority. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
11.
CampbellH (2012) Understanding the relationship between religion online and offline in a networked society. Journal of the American Academy of Religion80: 64–93.
12.
CampbellHTsuriaR (eds) (2022) Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in Digital Media. New York: Routledge.
13.
CastellsM (1996) The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
EickelmanDFAndersonJW (eds) (1999) New Media in the Muslim World: The Emerging Public Sphere. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
17.
El-NawawyMKhamisS (2009) Islam Dot Com: Contemporary Islamic Discourses in Cyberspace. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
ErhardFSammetK (2019) Everyday lived Islam of young people from Muslim migrant families in Germany. In: ArweckEShipleyH (eds) Young People and the Diversity of (Non) Religious Identities in International Perspective. Cham: Springer, pp. 221–239.
19.
GauthierF (2018) From nation-state to market: the transformations of religion in the global era, as illustrated by Islam. Religion48: 382–417.
20.
GauthierFMartikainenT (2013) Religion in Consumer Society: Brands, Consumers, and Markets. London: Routledge.
21.
GillespieT (2018) Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions that Shape Social Media. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
GuestGBunceAJohnsonL (2006) How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods18: 59–82.
23.
HallD (ed.) (1997) Lived Religion in America: Toward a History of Practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
IbahrineM (2014) Islam and social media. In: KerricH (ed.) Encyclopedia of Social Media and Politics. London: Sage, pp. 736–740.
25.
IbahrineM (2018) Digitally researching Islam(s). In: HunsingerJKlastrupLAllenM (eds) Second International Handbook of Internet Research. London: Springer, pp. 785–798.
26.
LeeSAtkinsonLSungYH (2022) Online bandwagon effects: quantitative versus qualitative cues in online comments sections. New Media & Society24: 580–599.
27.
MahmoodS (2011) Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
MungerKPhillipsJ (2022) Right-wing YouTube: a supply and demand perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics27: 186–219.
29.
PatelS (2022) Hybrid imams: young Muslims and religious authority on social media. In: RozehnalR (ed.) Cyber Muslims: Mapping Islamic Digital Media in the Internet Age. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 34–50.
30.
PattonM (2015) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. London: Sage.
31.
RibeiroMHOttoniRWestR, et al. (2020) Auditing radicalization pathways on YouTube. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Barcelona, 27–30 January, pp. 131–141. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
SislerV (2006) Islamic jurisprudence in cyberspace: construction of interpretative authority in Muslim diaspora. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology1(2): 205–217.
34.
SlamaM (2018) Practising Islam through social media in Indonesia. Indonesia and the Malay World46: 1–4.
35.
SorgenfreiS (2021) Branding Salafism: Salafi missionaries as social media influencers. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion34(3): 211–237.
TrysnesISynnesRM (2021) The role of religion in young Muslims’ and Christians’ self presentation on social media. Young30(3): 281–296.
40.
ZaidBFedtkeJShinDH, et al. (2022) Digital Islam and Muslim millennials: how social media influencers reimagine religious authority and Islamic practices. Religions13(4): 1–15.
41.
ZuboffS (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Hachette.
