Amid rapid population aging and shifting expectations of filial responsibility, this study investigates how smart speakers are shaping the negotiation of intergenerational care in Chinese families. Drawing on in-depth interviews with older adults and industry experts, we advance the concept of ambient care to capture the subtle, unobtrusive, and backgrounded ways in which smart speakers become embedded in intergenerational care relations. Our analysis identifies three roles through which ambient care is enacted: as a metronome of life that scaffolds temporally ordered self-care routines; as reverberations of affect that sustain companionship and kinship presence; and as a normative amplifier that renders intergenerational care expectations socially and acoustically salient. By conceptualizing techno-mediated care as a socio-material process, this study enriches our understanding of how technology becomes entangled with care in aging societies and contributes to broader discussions about the redistribution of care in the age of artificial intelligence.
BrauseSRBlankG (2024) ‘There are some things that I would never ask Alexa’–privacy work, contextual integrity, and smart speaker assistants. Information, Communication & Society27(1): 182–197.
4.
BrewerRN (2022) “If Alexa knew the state I was in, it would cry”: older adults’ perspectives of voice assistants for health. In: CHI conference on human factors in computing systems extended abstracts, New Orleans, LA, 29 April–5 May, Article 442. New York: ACM.
5.
BroekensJHeerinkMRosendalH (2009) Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology8(2): 94–103.
6.
BuseCMartinDNettletonS (2018) Conceptualising ‘materialities of care’: making visible mundane material culture in health and social care contexts. Sociology of Health & Illness40(2): 243–255.
7.
CaiTMaSZhongR (2025) Can intelligent virtual assistants improve cognitive function in older adults? A two-wave mediation study. Digital Health11: 20552076251317355.
8.
ChenFLiuGMairCA (2011) Intergenerational ties in context: grandparents caring for grandchildren in China. Social Forces90(2): 571–594.
9.
ChenH (2022) The “connected” caregivers: exploring the interplay of left-behind women’s socio-structural immobilities and communicative mobilities in transnational power geometries. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication27(2): zmac003.
10.
CheungC-KKwanAY-H (2009) The erosion of filial piety by modernisation in Chinese cities. Ageing and Society29(2): 179–198.
11.
CookDJAugustoJCJakkulaVR (2009) Ambient intelligence: technologies, applications, and opportunities. Pervasive and Mobile Computing5(4): 277–298.
12.
CorbettCFWrightPJJonesK, et al. (2021) Voice-activated virtual home assistant use and social isolation and loneliness among older adults: mini review. Frontiers in Public Health9: 742012.
13.
CreangăR (2025) Overlapping care and control: insights from Romanian smart speaker users. Media, Culture & Society47(7): 1307–1323.
14.
De La BellacasaMP (2011) Matters of care in technoscience: assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science41(1): 85–106.
15.
DowlingE (2022) The Care Crisis: What Caused It and How Can We End It?London: Verso.
16.
DuqueMPinkSStrengersY, et al. (2021) Automation, wellbeing and digital voice assistants: older people and Google devices. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies27(5): 1189–1206.
17.
EtzrodtKEngesserS (2021) Voice-based agents as personified things: assimilation and accommodation as equilibration of doubt. Human-Machine Communication2: 57–79.
18.
FeineJGnewuchUMoranaS, et al. (2019) A taxonomy of social cues for conversational agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies132: 138–161.
19.
GambinoAFoxJRatanR (2020) Building a stronger CASA: extending the computers are social actors paradigm. Human-Machine Communication1: 71–85.
20.
GamsMGuIY-HHärmäA, et al. (2019) Artificial intelligence and ambient intelligence. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments11(1): 71–86.
21.
GuzmanALLewisSC (2020) Artificial intelligence and communication: a human–machine communication research agenda. New Media & Society22(1): 70–86.
22.
HancockJTNaamanMLevyK (2020) AI-mediated communication: definition, research agenda, and ethical considerations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication25(1): 89–100.
23.
HansenLLDahlHMHornL (eds) (2021) A Care Crisis in the Nordic Welfare States? Care Work, Gender Equality and Welfare State Sustainability. Bristol: Policy Press.
24.
HeCYeJ (2014) Lonely sunsets: impacts of rural–urban migration on the left-behind elderly in rural China. Population, Space and Place20(4): 352–369.
25.
HjorthLLuptonD (2021) Digitised caring intimacies: more-than-human intergenerational care in Japan. International Journal of Cultural Studies24(4): 584–602.
26.
KimSChoudhuryA (2021) Exploring older adults’ perception and use of smart speaker-based voice assistants: a longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior124: 106914.
27.
LiuN (2025) CCTV cameras at home: temporality experience of surveillance technology in family life. New Media & Society27(6): 3699–3719.
28.
López-GómezDBeneito-MontagutRGarcía-SantesmasesA (2021) No future for care without new digital media? Making time(s) for mediated informal care practices in later life. International Journal of Cultural Studies24(4): 637–654.
29.
NaeemMOzuemWHowellK, et al. (2023) A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods22: 16094069231205789.
30.
NassCSteuerJTauberER (1994) Computers are social actors. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Boston, MA, 24–28 April, pp. 72–78. New York: ACM.
31.
NganLLS (2025) The impact of digital technologies on the transnational aging experience of older Hong Kongers. Global Networks25(1): e12519.
32.
PolJ (2012) Care at a Distance: On the Closeness of Technology. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
33.
PradhanAFindlaterLLazarA (2019) “Phantom friend” or “just a box with information”: personification and ontological categorization of smart speaker-based voice assistants by older adults. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction3(CSCW): 214.
34.
PuringtonATaftJGSannonS, et al. (2017) “Alexa is my new BFF”: social roles, user satisfaction, and personification of the Amazon Echo. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, Denver, CO, 6–11 May, pp. 2853–2859. New York: ACM.
SteinmüllerH (2023) Crises of care in China today. The China Quarterly254: 301–309.
39.
StevensCMurphyRHuangY, et al. (2025) Descending asymmetry in proximate, mobile and digital care: Chinese older people grandparenting across distance within China and overseas. The Sociological Review73(4): 807–825.
40.
SundarSS (2020) Rise of machine agency: a framework for studying the psychology of human–AI interaction (HAII). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication25(1): 74–88.
41.
TaylorSJBogdanRDeVaultML (2015) Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
42.
TrontoJC (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
43.
TurkleS (2005 [1984]) The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44.
TurkleS (2007) Authenticity in the age of digital companions. Interaction Studies8(3): 501–517.
45.
TurkleSTaggartWKiddCD, et al. (2006) Relational artifacts with children and elders: the complexities of cybercompanionship. Connection Science18(4): 347–361.
XuSLiW (2024) A tool or a social being? A dynamic longitudinal investigation of functional use and relational use of AI voice assistants. New Media & Society26(7): 3912–3930.
49.
YanY (2016) Intergenerational intimacy and descending familism in rural North China. American Anthropologist118(2): 244–257.
50.
YuHZhangGHjorthL (2023) Mobilizing care? WeChat for older adults’ digital kinship and informal care in Wuhan households. Mobile Media & Communication11(2): 294–311.
51.
ZavorettiR (2017) Get yourself an insurance! Negotiating family and intergenerational care in post-Mao urban China. Ethics and Social Welfare11(3): 248–260.
