This study examines two decades of user blocking on the English Wikipedia to understand how a volunteer-run, non-profit platform has adapted its content moderation practices in response to increasing visibility amid declining participation. Analyzing more than 20 million block log entries from 2004 to 2024, the study identifies shifts in block frequency, duration, and stated rationales. A significant increase in preemptive, automated blocking of open proxies since 2020 accounts for most block activity, but excluding these reveals a broader trend toward longer blocks and vaguer rationales such as “disruption.” These patterns suggest that volunteers are scaling labor through automation and normative adjustment, trading openness for efficiency and stability. Wikipedia’s blocking trends help to contextualize governance pressures on volunteer-run knowledge platforms.
BadieiFMearesTTylerT (2020) Community Vitality as a Theory of Governance for Online Interaction. Yale Journal of Law & Technology23: 8.
3.
BrownTBMannBRyderN, et al. (2020) Language models are few-shot learners. In: Proceedings of the NIPS’20: Proceedings of the 34th international conference on neural information processing systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6–12 December, pp. 1877–1901. New York: ACM.
4.
ButlerBJoyceEPikeJ (2008) Don’t look now, but we’ve created a bureaucracy: the nature and roles of policies and rules in Wikipedia. In: CHI ’08: proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Florence, 5–10 April, pp. 1101–1110. New York: ACM.
5.
ChandrasekharanEJhaverSBruckmanA, et al. (2022) Quarantined! Examining the effects of a community-wide moderation inervention on Reddit. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)29(4): 1–26.
6.
ChangJDanescu-Niculescu-MizilC (2019) Trajectories of blocked community members: redemption, recidivism and departure. In: WWW’19: the World Wide Web conference, San Francisco, CA, 13–17 May, pp. 184–195. New York: ACM.
FiansG (2024) The death of Elizabeth II on Wikipedia: fleshing out freedom through technoliberal participation online. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute30(4): 912–931.
9.
FordH (2022) Writing the Revolution: Wikipedia and the Survival of Facts in the Digital Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
GeigerRS (2009) The social roles of bots and assisted editing tools. In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on Wikis and open collaboration. New York: ACM. Available at: http://www.stuartgeiger.com/papers/geiger-wikisym-bots.pdf (accessed 16 April 2025).
11.
GeigerRS (2011) The lives of bots. In: LovinkGTkaczN (eds) Wikipedia: A Critical Point of View. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures, pp. 78–93.
12.
GierynTF (1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review48(6): 781–795.
13.
GillespieT (2018) Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
GorwaRBinnsRKatzenbachC (2020) Algorithmic content moderation: technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data & Society. Epub ahead of print 28February. DOI: 10.1177/2053951719897945.
HalfakerAGeigerRSTerveenLG (2014) Snuggle: designing for efficient socialization and ideological critique. In: CHI’14: proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Toronto, ON, Canada, 26 April–1 May, pp. 311–320. New York: ACM.
17.
HalfakerAGeigerRSMorganJT, et al. (2012) The rise and decline of an open collaboration system: how Wikipedia’s reaction to popularity is causing its decline. American Behavioral Scientist57(5): 664–688.
18.
JankowskiS (2023) The Wikipedia imaginaire: a new media history beyond Wikipedia.org (2001–2022). Internet Histories7(4): 333–353.
19.
JemielniakD (2014) Common Knowledge? An Ethnography of Wikipedia. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
20.
JhaverSGhosalSBruckmanA, et al. (2018) Online harassment and content moderation: the case of blocklists. ACM Transactions on Computer-human Interaction25(2): 1–33.
21.
JiangJVetterM (2019) The good, the bot, and the ugly: problematic information and critical media literacy in the postdigital era. Postdigitalscience and Education2: 78–94.
22.
JohnN (2024) A classification of features for interpersonal disconnectivity in digital media: block, unfriend, unfollow, mute, withhold, and eject. Media and Communication12: 8716.
23.
KeeganBFieslerC (2017) The evolution and consequences of peer producing Wikipedia’s rules. Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media11(1): 112–121.
24.
KitturASuhBPendletonBA, et al. (2007) He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia. In: CHI’07: proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, CA, 28 April–3 May, pp. 453–462. New York: ACM.
25.
KripleanTBeschastnikhIMcDonaldDW, et al. (2007) Community, consensus, coercion, control: cs*w or how policy mediates mass participation. In: GROUP’07: proceedings of the 2007 ACM international conference on supporting group work, Sanibel Island, FL, 4–7 November, pp. 167–176. New York: ACM.
26.
McDowellZVetterM (2022) Fast “truths” and slow knowledge; oracular answers and Wikipedia’s epistemology. Fast Capitalism2022: 104–112.
27.
McDowellZJVetterMA (2020) It takes a village to combat a fake news army: Wikipedia’s community and policies for information literacy. Social Media + Society6(3): 937309.
28.
McGradyR (2009) Gaming against the greater good. First Monday14(2): 2215.
29.
McGradyR (2013) Ethos [edit]: procedural rhetoric and the Wikipedia project. In: FolkMApostelS (eds) Online Credibility and Digital Ethos: Evaluating Computer Mediated Communication. Palmdale, PA: IGI Global, pp. 114–130.
MorganJTHalfakerA (2018) Evaluating the impact of the Wikipedia Teahouse on newcomer socialization and retention. In: Proceedings of the 14th international symposium on open collaboration, Paris, 22 August, pp. 1–7. New York: ACM.
32.
OstromE (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
PentzoldC (2010) Imagining the Wikipedia community: what do Wikipedia authors mean when they write about their ‘community’?New Media & Society13(5): 378364.
34.
ReagleJ (2010) Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
SchlugerCChangJPDanescu-Nicolescu-MizilC, et al. (2022) Proactive moderation of online discussions: existing practices and the potential for algorithmic support. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction6: 1–27.
TkaczN (2015) Wikipedia and the Politics of Openness. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41.
TranCChampionKForteA, et al. Are anonymity-seekers just like everybody else? An analysis of contributions to Wikipedia from Tor. In: Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE symposium on security and privacy, San Francisco, CA, 18–21May, pp. 186–202. New York: IEEE.
WulczynEThainNDixonL (2017) Ex Machina: personal attacks seen at scale. In: WWW’17: proceedings of the 26th international conference on World Wide Web, Perth, WA, Australia, 3–7 April, pp. 1391–1399. New York: ACM.
