This study examines thematic and engagement dynamics within r/PurplePillDebate, a Reddit community for deliberation between supporters and critics of anti-feminist “red pill” ideology. We utilize the Analysis of Topic Model Networks (ANTMN) and Content Engagement Capacity (CEC) frameworks to analyze 330,008 posts and comments, identifying 37 topics grouped into themes—Gender Dynamics and Socioeconomic Issues, Relationships and Gender Norms, and Attraction: An Exact Science Versus a Social Construct. We examine themes’ ability to sustain engagement, showing that sexual behavior and market-value topics generate the most replies, while attraction-focused content and deliberative topics generate the fewest. Gender- and norm-related discussions tend to self-reinforce, whereas attraction-related threads diffuse into broader debates. Findings inform the potential and limits of deliberative online spaces to foster cross-cutting engagement, with theoretical and practical implications for facilitating digital conversations and interventions aimed at countering extremist narratives and selective exposure.
AgiusCEdney-BrowneANicholasL, et al. (2023) Anti-feminism, gender and the far-right gap in C/PVE measures. In: RothermelA-KShepherdL J (eds) Gender and the Governance of Terrorism and Violent Extremism. London: Routledge, pp. 181–205.
2.
BailC (2021) Breaking the Social Media Prism: How to Make Our Platforms Less Polarizing. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BailCAArgyleLPBrownTW, et al. (2018) Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115(37): 9216–9221.
4.
BlondelVDGuillaumeJ-LLambiotteR, et al. (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment10: 1–12.
5.
BrownA (2017) What is so special about online (as compared to offline) hate speech?Ethnicities18(3): 297–326.
6.
ChipidzaWKrewsonCGattoN, et al. (2022) Ideological variation in preferred content and source credibility on Reddit during the COVID-19 pandemic. Big Data & Society9(1). DOI: 10.1177/20539517221076486.
7.
CinelliMDe Francisci MoralesGGaleazziA, et al. (2020) Echo chambers on social media: a comparative analysis. Arxiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.09603
8.
CoeKKenskiKRainsSA (2014) Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication64(4): 658–679.
DavisM (2018) ‘Culture is inseparable from race’: culture wars from Pat Buchanan to Milo Yiannopoulos. M/C Journal21(5). DOI: 10.5204/mcj.1484.
11.
De Francisci MoralesGMontiCStarniniM (2021) No echo in the chambers of political interactions on Reddit. Scientific Reports11(1): 2818.
12.
DickelVEvolviG (2023) “Victims of feminism”: exploring networked misogyny and #MeToo in the Manosphere. Feminist Media Studies23(4): 1392–1408.
13.
DixitP (2022) Red pills, white genocide, and “the Great Replacement”: rewriting history, and constructing white victimhood in/through far-right extremist manifestos and texts. In: Race, Popular Culture, and Far-right Extremism in the United States. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 173–205.
FarrellTFernandezMNovotnyJ, et al. (2019) Exploring misogyny across the Manosphere in Reddit. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on web science, Boston, MA, 30 June–3 July, pp. 87–96. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
18.
FieslerCZimmerMProferesN, et al. (2024) Remember the human: a systematic review of ethical considerations in Reddit research. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-computer Interaction8. DOI: 10.1145/3633070.
19.
FreedmanJLSearsDO (1965) Selective exposure. In: BerkowitzL (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, pp. 57–97.
20.
GingD (2017) Alphas, betas, and incels: theorizing the masculinities of the Manosphere. Men and Masculinities22(4): 638–657.
21.
GlinieckaM (2023) The ethics of publicly available data research: a situated ethics framework for Reddit. Social Media + Society9(3). DOI: 10.1177/20563051231192021.
22.
HabermasJ (1991) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
23.
HawleyG (2017) Making Sense of the Alt-Right. New York: Columbia University Press.
24.
JamiesonKHCapellaJN (2008) Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaush and the Conservative Media Establishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
Jones-JangSMChungM (2022) Can we blame social media for polarization? Counter-evidence against filter bubble claims during the COVID-19 pandemic. New Media & Society26(6): 3370–3389.
26.
KreissDMcGregorSC (2024) A review and provocation: on polarization and platforms. New Media & Society26(1): 556–579.
27.
LevenduskyMPasekJHolbertRL, et al. (2023) Democracy Amid Crises: Polarization, Pandemic, Protests, and Persuasion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
LiLReedD (2023) Unmasking the mask issue on Reddit: an investigation of online public deliberation around the mask controversy in the United States. Emerging Media1(1): 93–109.
29.
MaguRKumarNMLiuY, et al. (2024) Understanding online discussion across difference: insights from gun discourse on Reddit. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-computer Interaction8(CSCW2): 1–28.
30.
MaierDWaldherrAMiltnerP, et al. (2018) Applying LDA topic modeling in communication research: toward a valid and reliable methodology. Communication Methods and Measures12: 93–118.
31.
MarwickAECaplanR (2018) Drinking male tears: language, the Manosphere, and networked harassment. Feminist Media Studies18(4): 543–559.
32.
MasulloGMWilnerTStroudNJ (2022) What social media could be: normative frameworks for evaluating digital public spaces. Social Media and Society8(4): 1–11.
33.
MessingSWestwoodSJ (2014) Selective exposure in the age of social media: endorsements Trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research41(8): 1042–1063.
34.
MortensenTE (2016) Anger, fear, and games: the long event of #GamerGate. Games and Culture13(8): 787–806.
35.
MuddeC (2017) The Far Right in America. London: Routledge.
36.
MutzDC (2006) Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
NabhaniSAl-KhatibKPianzolaF, et al. (2025) Storytelling in argumentative discussions: exploring the use of narratives in ChangeMyView. In: Proceedings of the 12th argument mining workshop, Vienna, pp. 217–227. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.argmining-1.21
38.
NagleA (2017) Kill All Normies: Online Culture Wars from 4Chan and Tumblr to Trump and the Alt-right. New Alresford: John Hunt Publishing.
39.
ӦcalAXiaoLParkJ (2021) Reasoning in social media: insights from Reddit “Change My View” submissions. Online Information Review45(7): 1208–1226.
40.
OphirY (2025) Misinformation and Society. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
41.
OphirYWeimannG (2012) From terrorist to persona: para-social interaction and the ETA website. Perspectives on Terrorism6(1): 23–35.
42.
OphirYPrudenMLWalterD, et al. (2022) Weaponizing reproductive rights: a mixed-method analysis of White nationalists’ discussion of abortions online. Information, Communication & Society26(11): 2186–2211.
PapakonstantinouTHorneZ (2023) Characteristics of persuasive deltaboard members on Reddit’s r/ChangeMyView. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6h12t1vd
45.
PetruzzellisFBonchiFDe Francisci MoralesG, et al. (2023) On the relation between opinion change and information consumption on Reddit. Proceedings of the Seventeenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media17(1): 710–719.
46.
PriniskiHJHorneZ (2018) Attitude change on Reddit’s Change My View. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1076s3b2
47.
PrudenML (2021) “Maintaining Frame” in the Incelosphere: Mapping the Discourses, Representations and Geographies of Involuntary Celibates Online (Dissertation). Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University.
RibeiroMHBlackburnJBradlynB, et al. (2021) The evolution of the Manosphere across the web. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media15(1): 196–207.
53.
RiegerDKümpelASWichM, et al. (2021) Assessing the extent and types of hate speech in fringe communities: a case study of alt-right communities on 8chan, 4chan, and Reddit. Social Media and Society7(4). DOI: 10.1177/20563051211052906.
RothermelA-K (2023) The role of evidence-based misogyny in antifeminist online communities of the “Manosphere.”Big Data & Society10(1). DOI: 10.1177/20539517221145671.
56.
SerranoMABogunaMVespignaniA (2009) Extracting the multiscale backbone of complex weighted networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences106(16): 6483–6488.
57.
ShapleyLS (1953) A value for n-person games. Annals of Mathematics Studies28: 307–317.
58.
StroudNJ (2008) Media use and political predispositions: revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior30(3): 341–366.
59.
StroudNJ (2010) Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication60(3): 556–576.
ThomsonIT (2010) Culture Wars and Enduring American Dilemmas. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
62.
TosiJWarmkeB (2016) Moral grandstanding. Philosophy & Public Affairs44(3): 197–217.
63.
TreenKWilliamsHO’NeillS, et al. (2022) Discussions of climate change on Reddit: polarized discourse or deliberative debate?Environmental Communication16(5): 680–698.
64.
VallergaMZurbriggenEL (2021) Hegemonic masculinities in the ‘Manosphere’: a thematic analysis of beliefs about men and women on The Red Pill and Incel. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policies22: 602–625.
65.
Van ValkenburghSP (2021) Digesting the red pill: masculinity and neoliberalism in the Manosphere. Men and Masculinities24(1): 84–103.
66.
VidmarNRokeachM (1974) Archie Bunker’s bigotry: a study in selective perception and exposure. Journal of Communication24: 36–47.
67.
VinkDAbbasTVeilleux-LepageY, et al. (2024) “Because they are women in a man’s world”: a critical discourse analysis of incel violent extremists and the stories they tell. Terrorism and Political Violence36(6): 723–739.
68.
WalterDOphirY (2019) News frame analysis: an inductive mixed-method computational approach. Communication Methods and Measures13(4): 248–266.
69.
WalterDLokmanogluADOphirY, et al. (2025) Some assembly required: unpacking the content and spread of Wayfair conspiracy theory on Reddit and Twitter. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 29 May. DOI: 10.1177/14614448251341497.
70.
WangROphirYSemenovA, et al. (2025) Content engagement capacity: a network-based approach for evaluating the ability of frames to facilitate political online conversations. Information, Communication & Society. Epub ahead of print 21 March. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2025.2480205.
71.
WojcieszakM (2010) ‘Don’t talk to me’: effects of ideologically homogeneous online groups and politically dissimilar offline ties on extremism. New Media & Society12(4): 637–655.
72.
ZimmermanS (2024) The ideology of incels: misogyny and victimhood as justification for political violence. Terrorism and Political Violence36(2): 166–179.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
