This study examined people’s motives, perceived affordances, and gratifications of using BeReal, a photo-sharing mobile social media app. Through an online survey of 146 English-speaking BeReal users, the study applied the affordance framework and uses and gratifications theory to analyze user experiences and perceptions. Findings revealed the most significant gratifications obtained were expressing the authentic self, entertainment, connecting to others, and presenting the ideal self, and these perceived affordances moderated the relationships between motives and gratifications obtained. Users seeking companionship were more likely to alleviate loneliness through BeReal when they perceived stronger social presence. Those using BeReal to pass time found it more entertaining when the app was seen as less editable and ephemeral. In addition, users aiming to connect with others experienced greater satisfaction when they perceived content as less editable. This study provides insights into how affordances impact how satisfied users are with BeReal’s ability to gratify their needs.
BaekYMChoYKimH (2014) Attachment style and its influence on the activities, motives, and consequences of SNS use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media58(4): 522–541.
2.
BayerJBEllisonNBSchoenebeckSY, et al. (2015) Sharing the small moments: ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat. Information, Communication, & Society19(7): 1–22.
3.
BayerJBTriệuPEllisonNB (2020) Social media elements, ecologies, and effects. Annual Review of Psychology71: 471–497.
EvansSKPearceKEVitakJ, et al. (2017) Explicating affordances: a conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication22(1): 35–52.
11.
FerrisALHollenbaughEESommerPA (2021) Applying the uses and gratifications model to examine consequences of social media addiction. Social Media + Society7(2): 1–16.
12.
FoxJMcEwanB (2017) Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale. Communication Monographs84(3): 298–318.
13.
HellesR (2013) Mobile communication and intermediality. Mobile Media & Communication1(1): 14–19.
14.
HumphreysL (2023) Mobile social media: the challenges and opportunities continue. Mobile Media & Communication11(1): 74–79.
15.
KahlowJACokerMCRichardsR (2020) The multimodal nature of Snapchat in close relationships: toward a social presence-based theoretical framework. Computers in Human Behavior111: 106409.
16.
KambleADesaiSMehendaleS (2021) What makes them snap? Gratifications of using Snapchat by Generation Z. Asian Academy of Management Journal26(1): 1–23.
17.
KaňkováJStevicABinderA, et al. (2025) Time to BeReal! Exploring users’ well-being in relation to BeReal use duration. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 19 February. DOI: 10.1177/14614448251317689.
18.
KatzEBlumlerJGGurevitchM (1973) Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly37(4): 509–523.
19.
KatzEBlumlerJGGurevitchM (1974) Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In: BlumlerJGKatzE (eds) The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 19–32.
20.
KimJKimJYangH (2019) Loneliness and the use of social media to follow celebrities: a moderating role of social presence. The Social Science Journal56(1): 21–29.
21.
KircaburunKAlhabashSTosuntasSB, et al. (2020) Uses and gratifications of problematic social media use among university students: a simultaneous examination of the Big Five of personality traits, social media platforms, and social media use motives. International Journal of Mental Health Addiction18: 525–547.
22.
LaroseRMastroDEastinM (2001) Understanding Internet usage. Social Science Computer Review19(4): 395–413.
23.
MakkiTWDeCookJRKadylakT, et al. (2018) The social value of Snapchat: an exploration of affiliation motivation, the technology acceptance model, and relational maintenance in Snapchat use. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction34(5): 410–420.
24.
MerrillKJrKimJCollinsC (2022) AI companions for lonely individuals and the role of social presence. Communication Research Reports39(2): 93–103.
25.
PalmgreenPWennerLRosengrenK (1985) Uses and gratifications research: the past ten years. In: KERosengrenLAWennerPPalmgreen (eds) Media Gratifications Research: Current Perspectives. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 11–37.
26.
PalmgreenPWennerLARayburnJD (1980) Relations between gratifications sought and obtained: a study of television news. Communication Research7(2): 161–192.
QuinnK (2016) Why we share: a uses and gratifications approach to privacy regulation in social media use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media60(1): 61–86.
30.
ReddyAKumarPC (2024) ‘A teaspoon of authenticity’: exploring how young adults BeReal on social media. In: CHI ’24: Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (eds MuellerFFKyburzPWilliamsonJRSasCWilsonMLDugasPTShklovskiI), Honolulu, HI, USA, 11–16 May, Article 907. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
31.
RonzhynACardenalASRubioAB (2023) Defining affordances in social media research: a literature review. New Media & Society25(11): 3165–3188.
32.
RubinAM (2002) The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. In: BryantJZillmanD (eds) Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 525–548.
33.
RubinAM (2009) Uses and gratifications: an evolving perspective of media effects. In: RLNabiMBOliver (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Media Processes and Effects. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 147–160.
34.
RuggieroTE (2000) Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society3(1): 3–37.
35.
SeidmanG (2013) Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: how personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences54(3): 402–407.
36.
SharabatiA-AAAl-HaddadSAl-KhasawnehM, et al. (2022) The impact of TikTok user satisfaction on continuous intention to use the application. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity8(3): 125.
37.
SheldonPAntonyMGJohnson WareL (2021) Baby Boomers’ use of Facebook and Instagram: uses and gratifications theory and contextual age indicators. Heliyon7(4): e06670.
38.
SieponAM (2023) Constructing liveness on social media to establish ‘authenticity’: BeReal. A case study. MA thesis, Ultrecht University.
39.
SnyderSJ (2024) Always-on authenticity: challenging the BeReal ideal of “being real.”Media, Culture, & Society46(2): 404–413.
40.
SundarSSLimperosAM (2013) Uses and grats 2.0: new gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media57(4): 504–525.
41.
UtzSMuscanellNKhalidC (2015) Snapchat elicits more jealousy than Facebook: a comparison of Snapchat and Facebook use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking18(3): 141–146.
42.
VanhoffelenGSchreursLMeeusA, et al. (2025) BeReal, be happy? Examining the relationships between authentic self-presentations on BeReal and adolescents’ self-esteem. New Media and Society27(4): 2273–2292.
43.
WaddellTF (2016) The allure of privacy or the desire for self-expression? Identifying users’ gratifications for ephemeral, photograph-based communication. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking19(7): 441–445.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
