This study examines the transnational place-making in the digital space through a case study of “TikTok Refugees” migrating to the Xiaohongshu platform. Employing a dual methodology of digital ethnography and auto-ethnography, we argue that this migration functions as performative resistance against state territorialization while evoking the tension of visibility on the destination platform. These dynamics generates a range of discourses and practices related to place representations and negotiation, shaped by linguistic, cultural, and political boundaries between self and other. We discovered algorithmic governance, depoliticized solidarity, cultural ownership, and neoliberal precarity as important themes in this digital place-making. By focusing on privileged and metaphorical refugees, their reception on the host platform, and the responses from state and corporate actors, our findings advance understanding of digital places as both contested sites of power struggle and as containers for cultural fusion.
BraunVClarkeV (2021) Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. New York: Sage.
9.
CairnsDClementeM (2023) The Immobility Turn: Mobility, Migration and the COVID-19 Pandemic. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
10.
ChouliarakiLGeorgiouM (2019) The digital border: mobility beyond territorial and symbolic divides. European Journal of Communication34(6): 594–605.
11.
CoutureSToupinS (2019) What does the notion of “sovereignty” mean when referring to the digital?New Media & Society21(10): 2305–2322.
12.
DaltonCMTaylorLThatcherJ (2016) Critical data studies: a dialog on data and space. Big Data & Society3(1): 2053951716648346.
13.
De HaasH (2021) A theory of migration: the aspirations-capabilities framework. Comparative Migration Studies9(1): 1–35.
14.
Demont-HeinrichC (2011) Cultural imperialism versus globalization of culture: riding the structure-agency dialectic in global communication and media studies. Sociology Compass5(8): 666–678.
15.
DouGY (2021) Toward a non-binary sense of mobility: insights from self-presentation in Instagram photography during COVID-19 pandemic. Media, Culture & Society43(8): 1395–1413.
16.
DuffyBEMeisnerC (2023) Platform governance at the margins: social media creators’ experiences with algorithmic (in)visibility. Media, Culture & Society45(2): 285–304.
17.
FieslerCDymB (2020) Moving across lands: online platform migration in fandom communities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction4: 1–25.
GillespieMOsseiranSCheesmanM (2018) Syrian refugees and the digital passage to Europe: smartphone infrastructures and affordances. Social Media + Society4(1): 2056305118764440.
20.
GlaszeGCattaruzzaADouzetF, et al. (2023) Contested spatialities of digital sovereignty. Geopolitics28(2): 919–958.
HuangQZengJTanakaH, et al. (2025) Negotiating digital visibility in Asia: rethinking conceptual frameworks through (g)local communities and practices. Convergence31: 715–727.
26.
JeongUNirmalAJhaK, et al. (2024) User migration across multiple social media platforms. In: Proceedings of the 2024 SIAM international conference on data mining (SDM), 11January. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12613 (accessed 17 June 2025).
27.
JuR (2022) Producing entrepreneurial citizens: Governmentality over and through Hong Kong influencers on Xiaohongshu (Red). Policy & Internet14(3): 618–632.
28.
Kor-SinsR (2023) The alt-right digital migration: a heterogeneous engineering approach to social media platform branding. New Media & Society25(9): 2321–2338.
29.
LamontMMolnárV (2002) The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology28: 167–195.
30.
LefebvreH (1992) The Production of Space (trans. DNicholson-Smith). 1st ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
31.
LemsA (2016) Placing displacement: place-making in a world of movement. Ethnos81(2): 315–337.
32.
LeongCPanSLBahriS, et al. (2019) Social media empowerment in social movements: power activation and power accrual in digital activism. European Journal of Information Systems28: 173–204.
33.
LeursKSmetsK (2018) Five questions for digital migration studies: learning from digital connectivity and forced migration in(to) Europe. Social Media + Society4(1): 1–16.
34.
LowSM (2009) Towards an anthropological theory of space and place. Semiotica2009(175): 21–37.
35.
MancinelliFMolzJG (2024) Moving with and against the state: digital nomads and frictional mobility regimes. Mobilities19(2): 189–207.
36.
MilanS (2015) When algorithms shape collective action: social media and the dynamics of cloud protesting. Social Media + Society1(2): 2056305115622481.
OtalaJKurticGGrassoI, et al. (2021) Political polarization and platform migration: a study of Parler and Twitter usage by United States of America Congress members. In: Companion proceedings of the web conference 2021, New York, 3June2021, pp. 224–231. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
39.
OzduzenOKorkutUOzduzenC (2021) “Refugees are not welcome”: digital racism, online place-making and the evolving categorization of Syrians in Turkey. New Media & Society23(11): 3349–3369.
40.
PalmbergerM (2022) Refugees enacting (digital) citizenship through placemaking and care practices near and far. Citizenship Studies26: 781–798.
RogersR (2020) Deplatforming: following extreme internet celebrities to Telegram and alternative social media. European Journal of Communication35(3): 213–229.
46.
RonzhynACardenalASBatlle RubioA (2023) Defining affordances in social media research: a literature review. New Media & Society25(11): 3165–3188.
47.
RosaH (2013) Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity (trans. JTrejo-Mathys). New York: Columbia University Press.
48.
RuppertEIsinEBigoD (2017) Data politics. Big Data & Society4(2): 2053951717717749.
49.
SolomonikAHeuerH (2025) Social media journeys–mapping platform migration. In: Proceedings of the extended abstracts of the CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, 25April2025, pp. 1–6. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
SvasekMKomarovaM (2018) Spatiality, movement and place-making. In: KomarovaMSvašekM (eds) Ethnographies of Movement, Sociality and Space. Material Mediations. New York: Berghahn, pp. 1–42.
52.
TanYWangF (2025) RedNote: Americans and Chinese share jokes on “alternative TikTok” as US ban looms. BBC. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c983lr756xwo (accessed 18 January 2025).
53.
TazzioliM (2022) Extractive humanitarianism: participatory confinement and unpaid labor in refugees governmentality. Communication, Culture and Critique15(2): 176–192.
TorkjaziMRejaieRWillingerW (2009) Hot today, gone tomorrow: on the migration of MySpace users. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM workshop on online social networks, Barcelona, 17August2009, pp. 43–48. New York: ACM. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1592665.1592676 (accessed 18 June 2025).
56.
UdwanGLeursKAlencarA (2020) Digital resilience tactics of Syrian refugees in the Netherlands: social media for social support, health, and identity. Social Media + Society6(2): 2056305120915587.
57.
WittebornS (2021) Digital placemaking and the datafication of forced migrants. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies27(3): 637–648.
58.
XuJZhanY (2024) Can anthropologists get humor? A collaborative experiment on empathetic knowing at a time of predicaments. American Anthropologist126(3): 434–445.
59.
YuanKZhangLLyuH, et al. (2025) “I love the Internet again”: exploring the interaction inception of “TikTok Refugees” flocking into RedNote. In: Proceedings of the extended abstracts of the CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Yokohama Japan, 26April2025, pp. 1–8. New York: ACM.
60.
ZhangCMorrisC (2023) Borders, bordering and sovereignty in digital space. Territory, Politics, Governance11(6): 61051–61058.
61.
ZhangHHuangL (2025) “Cat taxes” showcase openness, humor of Chinese netizens as “TikTok refugees” flood RedNote. Global Times. Available at: https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202501/1326955.shtml (accessed 16 January 2025).
