Online informal groups play a growing role in disseminating and correcting misinformation on social media platforms, yet remain underexamined due to their semi-public nature. This study investigates how misinformation circulates in these groups, focusing on social distance, group status, and interpersonal dynamics. Drawing on Social Distance Theory of Power and Social Exchange Theory, we employed a mixed-methods approach, including non-participant observation, sociometric analysis, and semi-structured interviews across 12 Chinese online groups. Findings indicate that misinformation is often disseminated by socially distant yet structurally central members, while correction efforts come from more socially embedded but less influential participants. Group discussions reinforced trust in misinformation through interpersonal validation and repeated exposure. Correction was constrained by relational risks, making it a socially sensitive act. These insights highlight how group dynamics shape misinformation engagement and suggest the need for socially aware intervention strategies in these digital spaces.
AnspachNM (2017) The new personal influence: how our Facebook friends influence the news we read. Political Communication34(4): 590–606.
2.
BeyhanAAydınİ (2025) Why do teachers join informal groups and how are they managed? a research on informal groups in schools. European Journal of Education60(1): e70005.
3.
BoczkowskiPJSuenzoFMitchelsteinE, et al. (2022) From the barbecue to the sauna: a comparative account of the folding of media reception into the everyday life. New Media & Society24(12): 2725–2742.
4.
BogardusES (1933) A social distance scale. Sociology and Social Research22: 265–271.
5.
BogardusES (1947) Measurement of personal-group relations. Sociometry10(4): 306–311.
6.
BraunVClarkeV (2022) Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology9(1): 3.
7.
CampbellJLQuincyCOssermanJ, et al. (2013) Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research42(3): 294–320.
8.
ChadwickAHallNAVaccariC (2025) Misinformation rules!? could “group rules” reduce misinformation in online personal messaging?New Media & Society27(1): 106–126.
9.
ClarkMSReisHT (1988) Interpersonal processes in close relationships. Annual Review of Psychology39(1): 609–672.
10.
CropanzanoRMitchellMS (2005) Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management31(6): 874–900.
11.
DawsonS (1996) Interest groups, objectives and strategy. In: DawsonS (ed.) Analysing Organisations. London: Macmillan Education UK, pp. 29–52.
12.
El MikatiIKHoteitRHarbT, et al. (2023) Defining misinformation and related terms in health-related literature: scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research25: e45731.
13.
FiskeSTBerdahlJ (2007) Social power. In: KruglanskiAWHigginsET (eds) Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. 2nd ed.New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 678–692.
14.
GreenbergJBaronRA (2008) Behavior in Organizations. London: Pearson Education International.
15.
KalogeropoulosARossiniP (2025) Unraveling Whatsapp group dynamics to understand the threat of misinformation in messaging apps. New Media & Society27(3): 1625–1650.
16.
KaufmannKPeilC (2020) The mobile instant messaging interview (MIMI): using Whatsapp to enhance self-reporting and explore media usage in situ. Mobile Media & Communication8(2): 229–246.
17.
KooAZ-XSuM-HLeeS, et al. (2021) What motivates people to correct misinformation? examining the effects of third-person perceptions and perceived norms. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media65(1): 111–134.
18.
KwakNLaneDSZhuQ, et al. (2020) Political rumor communication on instant messaging platforms: relationships with political participation and knowledge. International Journal of Communication14: 20.
19.
LewandowskySEckerUKHSeifertCM, et al. (2012) Misinformation and its correction: continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest13(3): 106–131.
MageeJCSmithPK (2013) The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review17(2): 158–186.
22.
MalhotraP (2024) Misinformation in Whatsapp family groups: generational perceptions and correction considerations in a meso-news space. Digital Journalism12(5): 594–612.
23.
MorenoJL (1937) Sociometry in relation to other social sciences. Sociometry1(1/2): 206–219.
24.
MorenoJL (1951) Sociometry: Experimental Method and the Science of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon House.
25.
MorosoliSVan AelstPHumprechtE, et al. (2025) Identifying the drivers behind the dissemination of online misinformation: a study on political attitudes and individual characteristics in the context of engaging with misinformation on social media. American Behavioral Scientist69(2): 148–167.
26.
MudavadiKCTullyMLomoywaraDB (2025) Exploring Kenyans’ interactions with misinformation on Whatsapp. Mobile Media & Communication13(1): 69–87.
27.
NovOYeC (2008) Community photo sharing: motivational and structural antecedents. In: Proceedings of the international conference on information systems, ICIS 2008, Paris, 14–17 December. Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems.
28.
PerisRGimenoMAPinazoD, et al. (2002) Online chat rooms: virtual spaces of interaction for socially oriented people. Cyberpsychology & Behavior5(1): 43–51.
29.
RojasHBarnidgeMAbrilEP (2016) Egocentric publics and corrective action. Communication and the Public1(1): 27–38.
30.
RoseT (2022) Collective Illusions: Conformity, Complicity, and the Science of Why We Make Bad Decisions. London: Hachette UK.
31.
RossiniPStromer-GalleyJBaptistaEA, et al. (2021) Dysfunctional information sharing on Whatsapp and Facebook: the role of political talk, cross-cutting exposure and social corrections. New Media & Society23(8): 2430–2451.
32.
SaurweinFSpencer-SmithC (2020) Combating disinformation on social media: multilevel governance and distributed accountability in Europe. Digital Journalism8(6): 820–841.
33.
ShresthaASpezzanoF (2022) Characterizing and predicting fake news spreaders in social networks. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics13: 298–385.
34.
SiitonenM (2009) Exploring the experiences concerning leadership communication in online gaming groups. In: Proceedings of the 13th international MindTrek conference: everyday life in the ubiquitous era, Tampere, 30 September–2 October, pp. 90–93. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
35.
SrinivasPDasAPulabaigariV (2022) Fake spreader is narcissist; real spreader is Machiavellian prediction of fake news diffusion using psycho-sociological facets. Expert Systems with Applications207: 117952.
36.
Suarez-LledoVAlvarez-GalvezJ (2021) Prevalence of health misinformation on social media: systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research23(1): e17187.
37.
SwartJPetersCBroersmaM (2019) Sharing and discussing news in private social media groups: the social function of news and current affairs in location-based, work-oriented and leisure-focused communities. Digital Journalism7(2): 187–205.
38.
TerryGHayfieldNClarkeV, et al. (2017) Thematic analysis. In: WilligCRogersWS (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology (pp. 17–37). Newcastle upon Tyne: Sage.
39.
TostLPGinoFLarrickRP (2012) Power, competitiveness, and advice taking: why the powerful don’t listen. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes117(1): 53–65.
40.
Van der MeerTGJinY (2020) Seeking formula for misinformation treatment in public health crises: the effects of corrective information type and source. Health Communication35(5): 560–575.
41.
VellaKKlarkowskiMTurkayS, et al. (2020) Making friends in online games: gender differences and designing for greater social connectedness. Behaviour & Information Technology39(8): 917–934.
42.
WalterNBrooksJJSaucierCJ, et al. (2021) Evaluating the impact of attempts to correct health misinformation on social media: a meta-analysis. Health Communication36(13): 1776–1784.
43.
WangYMcKeeMTorbicaA, et al. (2019) Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media. Social Science & Medicine240: 112552.
44.
YanPSchroederR (2024) ‘Living in a post-truth era’? online misinformation in everyday life in rural and urban china. Information, Communication & Society28: 1195–1215.
45.
ZhangMXueYYangJ, et al. (2023) Why should I contribute my voice? analysis of members’ knowledge contribution behavior from a perspective of social distance. Library Hi Tech41(3): 807–832.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
