This study investigates gray areas of contemporary political campaigning from a political economy perspective. Using qualitative field and digital methods, computational methods, and economic modeling, it analyzes the scope, scale, and cost of commissioning social media influencers in the 2022 Philippine Elections across Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and TikTok. The researchers find that there is a high demand for influencers to campaign for candidates, characterized by premium and dynamic incentives under informal and obscure arrangements. We identified 1425 influencer accounts across the four social media platforms that engage in covert political campaigning and categorized them into seven types. The cost of these influencer-led campaigns is estimated to range from USD 27M following a pay-per-post compensation model, to USD 10.9M using a retainer model. This article serves as a model for both election research and election policy by providing a modular framework that addresses knowledge gaps in various country contexts.
AbhishekA (2021) Overlooking the political economy in the research on propaganda. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review2: 1–14.
2.
BennettWLivingstonS (2020) The disinformation age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BradshawSHenleA (2021) The gender dimensions of foreign influence operations. International Journal of Communication15: 23.
4.
BradshawSHowardPN (2018) The global organization of social media disinformation campaigns. Journal of International Affairs71(15): 23–32.
5.
Commission on Elections (2021) Resolution No. 10730: Rules and regulations implementing Republic Act No. 9006, otherwise known as the “Fair Election Act”, in connection with the May 9, 2022 National and Local Elections. COMELEC, 17 November. Available at: https://comelec.gov.ph/?r=2022NLE/Resolutions/res10730
6.
EiblOGregorM (2019) A brief historical overview of political campaigning: theories, concepts, and approaches. In: EiblOGregorM (eds) Thirty Years of Political Campaigning in Central and Eastern Europe. Cham: Springer, pp. 1–18.
7.
EsserFStrömbäckJ (2013) Comparing election campaign communication. In: EsserFHanitzschT (eds) The Handbook of Comparative Communication Research. New York: Routledge, pp. 289–307.
FarrellDM (2006) Political parties in a changing campaign environment. In: KatzRSCrottyWJ (eds) Handbook of Party Politics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 122–133.
11.
GethinAMartínez-ToledanoCPikettyT (2021) Political Cleavages and Social Inequalities in Fifty Democracies, 1948–2020. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
GoodwinAJoseffKRiedlMJ, et al (2023) Political relational influencers: the mobilization of social media influencers in the political arena. International Journal of Communication17: 21.
13.
HuddersLDe JansSDe VeirmanM (2020) The commercialization of social media stars: a literature review and conceptual framework on the strategic use of social media influencers. International Journal of Advertising40(3): 327–375.
KellerFBSchochDStierS, et al (2020) Political astroturfing on Twitter: how to coordinate a disinformation campaign. Political Communication37(2): 256–280.
LinvillDLWarrenPL (2020) Troll factories: manufacturing specialized disinformation on Twitter. Political Communication37(4): 447–467.
18.
LorenzanaJASorianoCRR (2021) Introduction: the dynamics of digital communication in the Philippines: legacies and potentials. Media International Australia179(1): 3–8.
MillerDRobinsonP (2019) Propaganda, politics and deception. In: Docan-MorganT (ed.) The Palgrave Handbook of Deceptive Communication. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 969–988.
NorrisPCurticeJSandersD, et al (1999) On Message: Communicating the Campaign. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
OngJCCabañesJV (2019) When disinformation studies meets production studies: social identities and moral justifications in the political trolling industry. International Journal of Communication13: 5771–5790.
24.
OngJCTapsellR (2022) Demystifying disinformation shadow economies: fake news work models in Indonesia and the Philippines. Asian Journal of Communication32(3): 251–267.
25.
OphirYWalterDMarchantER (2020) A collaborative way of knowing: bridging computational communication research and grounded theory ethnography. Journal of Communication70(3): 447–472.
26.
PerronL (2010) Election campaigns in the Philippines. In: JohnsonDW (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Political Management. New York: Routledge, pp. 360–369.
27.
PinkSHorstHAPostillJ, et al (eds) (2015) Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
RiedlMJLukitoJWoolleySC (2023) Political influencers on social media: an introduction. Social Media + Society9(2): 1–9.
SchmuckDHirschMStevicA, et al (2022) Politics–simply explained? How influencers affect youth’s perceived simplification of politics, political cynicism, and political interest. The International Journal of Press/Politics27(3): 738–762.
31.
SemetkoHATworzeckiH (2017) Campaign strategies, media, and voters: the fourth era of political communication. In: WlezienCFieldhouseEFisherJ, et al (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion. New York: Routledge, pp. 293–304.
32.
SinpengAGueorguievDArugayAA (2020) Strong fans, weak campaigns: social media and Duterte in the 2016 Philippine election. Journal of East Asian Studies20(3): 353–374.
33.
SoaresFBRecueroR (2021) Hashtag wars: political disinformation and discursive struggles on Twitter conversations during the 2018 Brazilian presidential campaign. Social Media + Society7(2): 1–13.
34.
SorianoCRRGawF (2022) Platforms, alternative influence, and networked political brokerage on YouTube. Convergence28(3): 781–803.
35.
StarbirdKDiRestaRDeButtsM (2023) Influence and improvisation: participatory disinformation during the 2020 US election. Social Media + Society9(2): 1–17.
36.
TeehankeeJ (2017) Electoral campaigning in the Philippines. In: SchaffererC (ed.) Election Campaigning in East and Southeast Asia: Globalization of Political Marketing. New York: Taylor & Francis, pp. 79–101.
37.
TuckerJA (2023) Computational social science for policy and quality of democracy: public opinion, hate speech, misinformation, and foreign influence campaigns. In: BertoniEGabrielliLFontanaM, et al (eds) Handbook of Computational Social Science for Policy. Cham: Springer, pp. 381–403.
38.
UdupaS (2024) Shadow politics: commercial digital influencers, “data,” and disinformation in India. Social Media + Society10(1): 1–10.
39.
WoolleySC (2022) Digital propaganda: the power of influencers. Journal of Democracy33(3): 115–129.
40.
WoolleySCHowardPN (eds) (2018) Computational Propaganda: Political Parties, Politicians, and Political Manipulation on Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
