An attack on free speech? Examining content moderation,(de-),and (re-) platforming on American right-wing alternative social media

Abstract

Contemporary research on social media looks different than it did in the late 2010s, with users facing a high-choice social media environment as new platforms emerge. Subsequently, alt-right sites have experienced a rise in users—sometimes those who have experienced content moderation by traditional social media sites. As such, scholars have investigated the impact of this content moderation (e.g. de-platforming) on users and the content posted on new alt-right platforms. This work seeks to expand extant research through analyzing a survey of Gab, Parler (now defunct), Truth Social, and Rumble users (N = 427) who have experienced content moderation on other social media sites. While we find that those temporarily or permanently banned from traditional sites are unlikely to leave the platform altogether for a right-wing alternative social media (RWASM) site, there are active users on these sites worth studying.

Keywords

Content moderation de-platforming echo chambers re-platforming social media

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

(2021) Americans divided on whether Trump should be permanently banned from social media. Pew Research Center. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/05/05/americans-divided-on-whether-trump-should-be-permanently-banned-from-social-media/

Are

Briggs

(2023) The emotional and financial impact of de-platforming on creators at the margins. Social Media + Society 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231155103

Baker

Wade

Walsh

(2020) The challenges of responding to misinformation during a pandemic: Content moderation and the limitations of the concept of harm. Media International Australia 177(1): 103–107.

Bond

(2022) Elon Musk allows Donald Trump back on Twitter. NPR, 19 November. Available at: https://www.npr.org/2022/11/19/1131351535/elon-musk-allows-donald-trump-back-on-twitter

Bright

Marchal

Ganesh

, et al. (2022) How do individuals in a radical echo chamber react to opposing views? Evidence from a content analysis of Stormfront. Human Communication Research 48(1): 116–145.

Brown

(2022) Jack Dorsey now agrees that Trump never should have been banned from Twitter. New York Post, 11 May. Available at: https://nypost.com/2022/05/11/jack-dorsey-agrees-trump-should-not-have-been-banned-from-twitter/

Cinelli

Morales

GDF

Galeazzi

, et al. (2021) The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118(9): e2023301118.

Cohen

(1985) Visions of social control. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Cook

Campbell

Shadish

(2002) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

10.

Ecker

UKH

Butlet

Hamby

(2020) You don’t have to tell a story! A registered report testing the effectiveness of narrative versus non-narrative misinformation corrections. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 64(5). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00266-x

11.

Elliott

(2022) Trump’s Twitter ban was unfair, but not for the reason that you think. WIRED, 16 December. Available at: https://www.wired.com/story/twitter-trump-world-leaders-ban/

12.

Field

(2017) Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS. 5th ed. London: Sage.

13.

Ganesh

Bright

(2020) Countering extremists on social media: challenges for strategic communication and content moderation. Policy & Internet 12(1): 46–65.

14.

Garrett

(2009) Echo chambers online? Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14(2): 265–285.

15.

Gehl

(2022) Citizens’ social media, like Mastodon, can provide an antidote to propaganda and disinformation. The Conversation, 25 October. Available at: https://theconversation.com/citizens-social-media-like-mastodon-can-provide-an-antidote-to-propaganda-and-disinformation-192491

16.

Gerard

Botzer

Weninger

(2023) Truth social dataset. Proceedings of the Seventeenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 17(1): 1034–1040.

17.

Gil de Zúñiga

(2015) Toward a European public sphere? The promise and perils of modern democracy in the age of digital and social media. International Journal of Communication 9: 3152–3160.

18.

Greenhalgh

Krutka

Oltmann

(2021) Gab, Parler, and (mis)educational technologies: reconsidering informal learning on social media platforms. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design 10(3): 10.51869.

19.

Grimmelmann

(2015) The virtues of moderation. Yale Journal of Law and Technology 17: 42–109.

20.

Holt

(2019) Right-Wing Alternative Media. London: Routledge.

21.

Hornsey

(2008) Social Identity Theory and self-categorization theory: a historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2(1): 204–222.

22.

Innes

(2023) De-platforming disinformation: conspiracy theories and their control. Information, Communication & Society 26(6): 1262–1280.

23.

Iqbal

Haseeb Arshad

Tyson

, et al. (2022) Exploring crowdsourced content moderation through lens of Reddit during COVID-19. In: Proceedings of the 17th Asian internet engineering conference, pp. 26–36. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3570748.3570753

24.

Jhaver

Boylston

Yang

, et al. (2021) Evaluating the effectiveness of deplatforming as a moderation strategy on Twitter. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5(CSCW2): 1–30.

25.

Karlsen

(2015) Followers are opinion leaders: The role of people in the flow of political communication on and beyond social networking sites. European Journal of Communication 30(3): 301–318.

26.

Kozyreva

Herzog

Lewandowsky

, et al. (2023) Resolving content moderation dilemmas between free speech and harmful misinformation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(7): e2210666120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2210666120

27.

Mekacher

Falkenberg

Baronchelli

(2023) The systemic impact of deplatforming on social media. Social and Information Networks, Cornell University. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.11147

28.

Meta (2023) Transparency Center. Available at: https://transparency.fb.com/reports/community-standards-enforcement/

29.

Morrow

Swire-Thompson

Montgomery Polny

, et al. (2022) The emerging science of content labeling: contextualizing social media content moderation. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 73(10): 1365–1386.

30.

Myers West

(2018) Censored, suspended, shadowbanned: user interpretations of content moderation on social media platforms. New Media & Society 20(11): 4366–4383.

31.

Shao

Geng

, et al. (2020) Development of the social media engagement scale for adolescents. Foundations in Psychology 11: 701.

32.

Nyhan

Reifler

(2010) When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior 32: 303–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2

33.

Paudel

Blackburn

De Cristofaro

, et al. (2022) A longitudinal study of the Gettr social network. In: Proceedings of the 2022 international workshop on cyber social threats. Available at: https://workshop-proceedings.icwsm.org/pdf/2022_62.pdf

34.

Ribeiro

Hosseinmardi

West

, et al. (2023) Deplatforming did not decrease Parler users’ activity on fringe social media. PNAS Nexus 2(5): pgad035.

35.

Riemer

Peter

(2021) Algorithmic audiencing: why we need to rethink free speech on social media. Journal of Information Technology 36(4): 409–426.

36.

Roberts

(2014) Behind the screen: the hidden digital labor of commercial content moderation. PhD Thesis, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL.

37.

Stockling

Mitchell

Matsa

, et al. (2022) The role of alternative social media in the news and information environment. Pew Research Center. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2022/10/06/the-role-of-alternative-social-media-in-the-news-and-information-environment/

38.

Strömbäck

(2023) Political alternative media as a democratic challenge. Digital Journalism 11(5): 880–887.

39.

Suzor

Myers West

Quodling

, et al. (2019) What do we mean when we talk about transparency. International Journal of Communication 13(2019): 1526–1543.

40.

Thorson

Battocchio

(2023) “I use social media as an escape from all that”: personal platform architecture and the labor of avoiding news. Digital Journalism. Epub ahead of print 22 August. DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2023.2244993.

41.

Trepte

Loy

(2017) Social identity theory and self-categorization theory. In: Rössler

(ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1–13.

42.

Turner

Hogg

Oakes

, et al. (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. New York: Blackwell.

43.

Urman

Katz

(2020) What they do in the shadows: Examining the far-right networks on Telegram. Information, Communication & Society 25(7): 904–923.

44.

U.S. Census Bureau (2021) 2021 American Community Survey. Available at: www.census.gov

45.

World Population Review (2024) Telegram users by country 2024. Available at: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/telegram-users-by-country

46.

Fang

(2023) Social media suspensions as dignity takings: users’ personal loss in “account bombing.” New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 8 September. DOI: 10.1177/14614448231197370.

47.

Zannettou

Bradlyn

D e Cristofaro

, et al. (2018) What is Gab: a bastion of free speech or an alt-right echo chamber. In: WWW ’18: companion proceedings of the web conference 2018, pp. 1007–1014. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3184558.3191531

48.

Zhu

Skoric

(2022) Political implications of disconnection on social media: a study of politically motivated unfriending. New Media & Society 24(12): 2659–2679.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB