Behold the metaverse: Facebook’s Meta imaginary and the circulation of elite discourse

Abstract

Despite pushback from regulatory and non-governmental entities, Meta’s control over the public narrative remains consistent. Using a method of corpus analysis, this study investigated the company’s sociotechnical imaginary as it circulates in media artifacts (428) responding to Zuckerberg’s 2021 Metaverse announcement. Analysis of how these artifacts respond to issues related to identity, security, and connectivity revealed that the majority amplify Meta’s corporate messaging, empowering its elite discourse and solidifying its socio-technological power. As it relates to user privacy, however, this study uncovered a limited number of artifacts in which journalists challenged rather than repeated Meta’s rhetoric. As an implication of this finding, future tech journalism should consider privacy as a starting point for critiques that also interrogate the underlying logic of surveillance capitalism and user exploitation. Ultimately, this article addresses the rhetorical functions deployed in the circulation of elite discourse while acknowledging the dynamism of sociotechnical imaginaries.

Keywords

Elite discourse Facebook Meta metaverse social power sociotechnical imaginaries VR

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alkemade

Suurs

(2012) Patterns of expectations for emerging sustainable technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79(3): 448–456.

Bazerman

(1998) The production of technology and the production of human meaning. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 12(3): 381–387.

Bazerman

(2002) The Languages of Edison’s Light. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Beer

(2018) The Data Gaze. London: Sage.

Beer

Burrows

(2007) Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: some initial considerations. Sociological Work Online 12(5): 67–79.

Benoit

(1996) A note on Burke on “motive.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 26(2): 67–79.

Berkhout

(2006) Normative expectations in systems innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18(3–4): 299–311.

Brown

(2015) Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.

Buozis

(2022) Making common sense of cyberlibertarian ideology: the journalistic consecration of John Perry Barlow. Internet Histories 6(3): 298–314.

10.

Burke

(1969) A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

11.

Christin

(2020) The ethnographer and the algorithm: beyond the black box. Theory and Society 49(5–6): 897–918.

12.

Creech

(2020) Fake news and the discursive construction of technology companies’ social power. Media, Culture & Society 42(6): 952–968.

13.

Creech

Maddox

(2022) Thus spoke Zuckerberg: journalistic discourse, executive personae, and the personalization of tech industry power. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 16 August. DOI: 10.1177/14614448221116344.

14.

Dourish

Bell

(2011) Divining a Digital Future: Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

15.

Ferrari

(2020) Technocracy meets populism: the dominant technological imaginary of Silicon Valley. Communication, Culture, & Critique 13: 121–124.

16.

Freishtat

Sandlin

(2010) Shaping youth discourse about technology: technological colonization, manifest destiny, and the frontier myth in Facebook’s public pedagogy. Educational Studies 46(5): 503–523.

17.

Froehlich

(2015) Corpus analysis with AntConc. Programming Historian. Available at: https://programminghistorian.org/en/lessons/corpus-analysis-with-antconc (accessed 5 March 2023).

18.

Gillespie

(2010) The politics of “platforms.” New Media & Society 12(3): 347–364.

19.

Haupt

(2021) Facebook futures: Mark Zuckerberg’s discursive construction of a better world. New Media & Society 23(2): 237–257.

20.

Hockenhull

Cohn

(2021) Hot air and corporate sociotechnical imaginaries: performing and translating digital futures in the Danish tech scene. New Media & Society 23(2): 302–321.

21.

Hoffmann

Proferes

Zimmer

(2018) “Making the world more open and connected”: Mark Zuckerberg and the discursive construction of Facebook and its users. New Media & Society 20(1): 199–218.

22.

Jasanoff

Kim

(2009) Containing the atom: sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47(2): 119–146.

23.

John

(2012) Sharing and Web 2.0: the emergence of a keyword. New Media & Society 15(2): 167–182.

24.

Konrad

(2006) The social dynamics of expectations: the interaction of collective and actor-specific expectations on electronic commerce and interactive television. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18(3–4): 429–444.

25.

Kraus

Kanbach

Krysta

, et al. (2022) Facebook and the creation of the Metaverse: radical business model innovation or incremental transformation? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 28(9): 52–77.

26.

Lamot

(2022) What the metrics say: The softening of news on the Facebook pages of mainstream media outlets. Digital Journalism 10(4): 517–536.

27.

Laurence Anthony’s AntConc (n.d.) Available at: https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/ (accessed 5 March 2023).

28.

Liao

(2019) Future directions for mobile augmented reality research: understanding relationships between augmented reality users, nonusers, content, devices, and industry. Mobile Media & Communication 7(1): 131–149.

29.

Liao

Iliadis

(2021) A future so close: mapping 10 years of promises and futures across the augmented reality development cycle. New Media & Society 23(2): 258–283.

30.

Lischka

(2021) Logics in social media news making: how social media editors marry the Facebook logic with journalistic standards. Journalism 22(2): 430–446.

31.

Mager

Katzenbach

(2021) Future imaginaries in the making and governing of digital technology: multiple, contested, commodified. New Media & Society 23(2): 223–236.

32.

Meta (2021) The Facebook company is now meta. Available at: https://about.fb.com/news/2021/10/facebook-company-is-now-meta/ (accessed 10 January 2022).

33.

Moran

(2020) Examining switching power: Mark Zuckerberg as a novel networked media mogul. Information, Communication & Society 23(4): 491–506.

34.

Noman

ASM

Das

Patil

(2019) Techies against Facebook: understanding negative sentiment toward Facebook via user generated content. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 468: 1–15.

35.

Otto

Glogger

Boukes

(2017) The softening of journalistic political communication: A comprehensive framework model of sensationalism, soft news, infotainment, and tabloidization: softening of journalistic political communication. Communication Theory 27(2): 136–155.

36.

Paul

(2021) Do the Facebook papers spell doom for Meta—or is it too big to fail? The Guardian, 30 October. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/oct/30/facebook-papers-meta-analysis-zuckerberg (accessed 28 February 2023).

37.

Payne

(2014) Frictionless sharing and digital promiscuity. Communication and Critical/cultural Studies 11(2): 85–102.

38.

Pedersen

(2013) Ready to Wear: A Rhetoric of Wearable Computers and Reality-Shifting Media. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.

39.

Romo

(2021) Whistleblower’s testimony has resurfaced Facebook’s Instagram problem. NPR, 5 October. Available at: https://www.npr.org/2021/10/05/1043194385/whistleblowers-testimony-facebook-instagram (accessed 5 March 2023).

40.

Ruef

Markard

(2010) What happens after a hype? How changing expectations affected innovation activities in the case of stationary fuel cells. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22(3): 317–338.

41.

Saker

Frith

(2022) Contiguous identities: the virtual self in the supposed Metaverse. First Monday 27(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v27i3.12471.

42.

Sherman

(2023) Facebook owner Meta sees latest layoffs begin. BBC News, 19 April. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-65330301

43.

Sismondo

(2020) Sociotechnical imaginaries: an accidental themed issue. Social Studies of Science 50(4): 505–507.

44.

Timberg

Dwoskin

Albergotti

(2021) Inside Facebook, Jan. 6 violence fueled anger, regret over missed warning signs. Washington Post, 22 October. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/10/22/jan-6-capitol-riot-facebook/ (accessed 5 March 2023).

45.

Vaidhyanathan

(2018) Antisocial Media: How Facebook Disconnects Us and Undermines Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

46.

Vallance

(2022) Facebook-owner meta to cut 11,000 staff. BBC News, 9 November. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-63568585

47.

Van Dijck

(2013) ‘You have one identity’: performing the self on Facebook and LinkedIn. Media, Culture & Society 35(2): 199–215.

48.

Van Dijk

(1993) Elite Discourse and Racism. London: Sage.

49.

Van Lente

(2012) Navigating foresight in a sea of expectations: lessons from the sociology of expectations. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24(8): 769–782.

50.

Zuboff

(2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile Books.

51.

Zuckerberg

(2021) Meta (Facebook) connect 2021 metaverse event transcript. Rev. Available at: https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/meta-facebook-connect-2021-Metaverse-event-transcript (accessed 12 September 2022).