“A friend who knows what they’re talking about”: Extending source credibility theory to analyze the wellness influencer industry on Instagram

Abstract

While many scholars have explored the norms central to the success of social media influencers, credibility is a necessary attribute of creator presentation that remains underexplored. This essay argues for the application and extension of source credibility theory (SCT) to unpack how credibility manifests within the wellness influencer industry on Instagram. SCT originally included three constructs: expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. I extend this theoretical framework by considering a fourth construct: positionality. When applied with the additional construct, SCT can help explain how influencers build and maintain credibility over time, especially within the wellness industry, where some influencers do not have more traditional forms of expertise like degrees and certifications in a health-related field. Through in-depth interviews with wellness influencers across the United States, I detail how credibility is operationalized within the wellness industry on Instagram and utilized to build relationships with followers and grow successful businesses.

Keywords

Instagram positionality social media influencer source credibility theory wellness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abidin

(2014) Privacy for profit: commodifying privacy in lifestyle blogging. In: Selected papers of internet research 15: the 15th annual meeting of the association of internet researchers, Daegu, South Korea, 22–24 October. Available at: https://spir.aoir.org/ojs/index.php/spir/article/view/8800

Abidin

(2016) “Aren’t these just young, rich women doing vain things online?”: influencer selfies as subversive frivolity. Social Media and Society 2(2): 1–17.

Abidin

Ots

(2016) Influencers tell all? Authenticity and credibility in brand scandal. In: Edström

Kenyon

Svensson

(eds) Blurring the Lines: Market-Driven and Democracy-Driven Freedom of Expression. Göteborg: Nordicom, pp. 153–161.

AlFarraj

Alalwan

Obeidat

, et al. (2021) Examining the impact of influencers’ credibility dimensions: attractiveness, trustworthiness and expertise on the purchase intention in the aesthetic dermatology industry. Review of International Business and Strategy 31(3): 355–374.

Aventive (2021) The impact of influencer marketing on the wellness industry. Aventive Studio, 2 November. Available at: https://aventivestudio.com/the-impact-of-influencer-marketing-on-the-wellness-industry/

Baker

Churchill

(1977) The impact of physically attractive models on advertising evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research 14: 538–555.

Balaban

Mustatea

(2019) Users’ perspective on the credibility of social media influencers in Romania and Germany. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations 21(1): 31–46.

BioSpace (2022) Health and wellness market size to worth around US $6.75 trillion by 2030. BioSpace, 2 August. Available at: https://www.biospace.com/article/health-and-wellness-market-size-to-worth-around-us-6-75-trillion-by-2030/#:~:text=All%20(759%2C784)-,Health%20and%20Wellness%20Market%20Size%20to,US%24%206.75%20Trillion%20by%202030&text=According%20to%20Vision%20Research%20Report,5.2%25%20from%202021%20to%202030

Burgoon

(1976) The ideal source: a reexamination of source credibility measurement. Central States Speech Journal 27: 200–206.

10.

Chaiken

(1979) Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(2): 1387–1397.

11.

Charmaz

(2014) Constructing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

12.

Djafarova

Rushworth

(2017) Exploring the credibility of online celebrities Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in Human Behavior 68: 1–7.

13.

Djafarova

Trofimenko

(2019) ‘Instafamous’ – credibility and self-presentation of micro-celebrities on social media. Information, Communication, & Society 22(10): 1432–1446.

14.

Donelly

Toscano

(2017) The Woman Who Fooled the World: Belle Gibson’s Cancer Con, and the Darkness at the Heart of the Wellness Industry. London: Scribe Publications.

15.

Duffy

(2017) (Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Love: Gender, Social Media, and Aspirational Work. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

16.

Duffy

Hund

(2015) “Having it all” on social media: entrepreneurial femininity and self-branding among fashion bloggers. Social Media and Society 1(2): 1–11.

17.

Glaser

Strauss

(1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

18.

Heilweil

(2020) Why algorithms can be racist and sexist. Vox, 18 February. Available at: https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/2/18/21121286/algorithms-bias-discrimination-facial-recognition-transparency

19.

Hong

Len-Riós

(2015) Does race matter? Implicit and explicit measures of the effort of the PR spokesman’s race on evaluations of spokesman source credibility and perceptions of a PR crisis’ severity. Journal of Public Relations Research 27(1): 63–80.

20.

Hovland

Weiss

(1951) The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly 15: 635–650.

21.

Hovland

Janis

Kelley

(1953) Communication and Persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

22.

Joseph

(1982) The credibility of physically attractive communicators: a review. Journal of Advertising 11(3): 15–24.

23.

Kahle

Homer

(1985) Physical attractiveness of the celebrity endorser: a social adaptation perspective. Journal of Consumer Research 11: 31–34.

24.

Khatib

(1989) Race and credibility in persuasive communication. Journal of Black Studies 19(3): 361–373.

25.

Kosumasondjaja

(2020) Exploring the role of visual aesthetics and presentation modality in luxury fashion brand communication on Instagram. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 24(1): 15–31.

26.

Ludevig

(2016) Using embodied knowledge to unlock innovation, creativity, and intelligence in businesses. Organizational Aesthetics 5(1): 150166.

27.

McCosker

(2018) Engaging mental health online: insights from Beyondblue’s forum influencers. New Media and Society 20(12): 4748–4764.

28.

McCracken

(1989) Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research 16(3): 310–321.

29.

McCroskey

(1966) Scales for measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs 33: 65–72.

30.

McQuarrie

Miller

Phillips

(2013) The megaphone effect: taste and audience in fashion blogging. Journal of Consumer Research 40: 136–158.

31.

Maddux

Rogers

(1980) Effects of source expertness, physical attractiveness, and supporting arguments on persuasion: a case of brains over beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(2): 235–244.

32.

Marwick

(2015) You may know me from YouTube: (micro-) celebrity on social media. In: Marshall

Redmond

(eds) A Companion to Celebrity. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 334–350.

33.

Mills

Aronson

(1965) Opinion change as a function of communicator’s attractiveness and desire to influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1(2): 173–177.

34.

Noble

(2018) Algorithms of Oppression: How Sear Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: NYU Press.

35.

Ohanian

(1990) Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising 19(3): 39–52.

36.

O’Neill

(2020) Pursuing “wellness”: considerations for media studies. Television and New Media 21(6): 628–634.

37.

Ruhl

(2020) Implicit or unconscious bias. Simply Psychology, 24 February. Available at: https://www.simplypsychology.org/implicit-bias.html

38.

Schlossberg

(2016) Instagram is spurring the biggest shift the fitness world has seen in decades. Independent, 18 April. Available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/instagram-is-spurring-the-biggest-shift-the-fitness-world-has-seen-in-decades-a6990001.html

39.

Senft

(2008) Camgirls: Celebrity and Community in the Age of Social Networks. New York: Peter Lang.

40.

Spence

Lachlan

Westerman

, et al. (2013) Where the gates matter less: ethnicity and perceived source credibility in social media health messages. Howard Journal of Communication 24(1): 1–16.

41.

Stanley

Clow

James

(2011) The impact of visual strategy and race and gender congruency on source credibility of print advertisements. Marketing Management Journal 21(2): 81–94.

42.

Stoldt

Wellman

Ekdale

, et al. (2019) Professionalizing and profiting: the rise of intermediaries in the social media influencer industry. Social Media and Society 5(1): 1–11.

43.

Wellman

(2020) Trans-mediated parasocial relationships: private Facebook groups foster influencer-follower connection. New Media and Society 23(12): 3557–3573.

44.

Wellman

(2022) Social media influencer rhetoric and the domestication of health at every size on Instagram. Rhetoric of Health and Medicine 5(1): 38–65.

45.

Wellman

Stoldt

Tully

, et al. (2020) Ethics of authenticity: social media influencers and the production of sponsored content. Journal of Media Ethics 35(2): 68–82.

46.

Whitehead

(1968) Factors of source credibility. Quarterly Journal of Speech 54(1): 59–63.

47.

Wiley

(2014) Why brands should turn to bloggers instead of celebrity spokespeople. Marketing Land, 7 March. Available at: https://marketingland.com/brands-turn-bloggers-instead-celebrity-spokespeople-75971

48.

Yilmazdogan

Dogan

Altintas

(2020) The impact of the source credibility of Instagram influencers on travel intention: the mediating role of parasocial interaction. Journal of Vacation Marketing 27(3): 299–313.