Prior theoretical perspectives assert that mobile media and communication accelerate time perception. To test this hypothesis, we coupled mobile app logs and experience sampling to capture social app use and time perception in daily life. Participants (N = 132) provided self-reports of time perception (n = 9,081) and recordings of social app use (n = 2,193,655). Although people perceived time as relatively fast on average, results did not support an overall link between social app use and accelerated time perception. Conversely, social media use—but not messaging use—was associated with decelerated time perception. In addition, observed relationships between social app use and time perception were consistent across individuals. We conclude by considering how future mobile communication research will be challenged to measure and model how temporal flows are interwoven with mobile connection in the background of daily life.
AtchleyPWardenAC (2012) The need of young adults to text now: using delay discounting to assess informational choice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition1(4): 229–234.
2.
BarleySRMeyersonDGrodalS (2011) E-mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organization Science22(4): 887–906.
3.
BatesDMaechlerMBolkerB, et al. (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software67(1): 1–48.
4.
BayerJBCampbellSWLingR (2016) Connection cues: activating the norms and habits of social connectedness. Communication Theory26(2): 128–149.
5.
BayerJBEllisonNSchoenebeckS, et al. (2018) Facebook in context(s): measuring emotional responses across time and space. New Media & Society20(3): 1047–1067.
6.
BayerJBTriệuPEllisonNB (2020) Social media elements, ecologies, and effects. Annual Review of Psychology71: 471–497.
7.
BeerD (2008) Social network(ing) sites. . . revisiting the story so far: a response to Danah Boyd & Nicole Ellison. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13(2): 516–529.
8.
BeyensIPouwelsJLVan DrielII, et al. (2020) The effect of social media on well-being differs from adolescent to adolescent. Scientific Reports10: 10763.
9.
BittmanMBrownJEWajcmanJ (2009) The mobile phone, perpetual contact and time pressure. Work Employment and Society23(4): 673–691.
10.
BoaseJ (2016) Augmenting survey and experimental designs with digital trace data. Communication Methods and Measures10(2–3): 165–166.
11.
BoaseJLingR (2013) Measuring mobile phone use: self-report versus log data. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication18(4): 508–519.
12.
BurchellK (2015) Tasking the everyday: where mobile and online communication take time. Mobile Media & Communication3(1): 36–52.
13.
CallegaroMYangY (2018) The role of surveys in the era of “big data.” In: VannetteDLKrosnickJA (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 175–192.
14.
CampbellSW (2013) Mobile media and communication: a new field, or just a new journal?Mobile Media & Communication1(1): 8–13.
15.
CampbellSWRossMQ (2021) Re-conceptualizing solitude in the digital era: from “being alone” to “noncommunication.”Communication Theory32(3): 387–406.
16.
CampbellSWZhaoFFrithJ, et al. (2021) Imagining 5G: public sense-making through advertising in China and the US. Mobile Media & Communication9(3): 546–562.
17.
Droit-VoletSWeardenJ (2016) Passage of time judgements are not duration judgements: evidence from a study using experience sampling methodology. Frontiers in Psychology7: 176.
18.
FarmanJ (2018) Delayed Response: The Art of Waiting from the Ancient to the Instant World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19.
FeenbergA (1989) The written world: on the theory and practice of computer conferencing. In: MasonRKayeA (eds) Mindweave: Communication, Computers and Distance Education. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 22–39.
20.
FortunatiL (2002) The mobile phone: towards new categories and social relations. Information, Communication & Society5(4): 513–528.
21.
Frith (2015) Smartphones as Locative Media. Cambridge: Polity.
22.
GergenKJ (1973) Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology26(2): 309–320.
23.
GörlandSO (2019) Really “dead time”? Mobile media use and time perception in in-between times. In: HartmannMPrommerEDecknerK, et al. (eds) Mediated Time: Perspectives on Time in a Digital Age. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 321–340.
24.
GreenN (2002) On the move: technology, mobility, and the mediation of social time and space. The Information Society18(4): 281–292.
25.
GreggM (2018) Counterproductive: Time Management in the Knowledge Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
26.
HammondC (2012) Time Warped: Unlocking the Mysteries of Time Perception. Edinburgh: House of Anansi.
27.
HintzeDHintzePFindlingRD, et al. (2017) A large-scale, long-term analysis of mobile device usage characteristics. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies1(2): 13.
28.
JoHHKarsaiMKertészJ, et al. (2012) Circadian pattern and burstiness in mobile phone communication. New Journal of Physics14(1): 013055.
29.
KeightleyE (2013) From immediacy to intermediacy: the mediation of lived time. Time & Society22(1): 55–75.
30.
KruglanskiAWPierroAHigginsTE (2015) Experience of time by people on the go: a theory of the locomotion-temporality interface. Personality and Social Psychology Review20(2): 100–117.
31.
LicoppeC (2004) “Connected” presence: the emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22(1): 135–156.
32.
LingR (2012) Taken for Grantedness: The Embedding of Mobile Communication into Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
LingRLaiCH (2016) Microcoordination 2.0: social coordination in the age of smartphones and messaging apps. Journal of Communication66(5): 834–856.
34.
LingRYtrriB (2002) Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway. In: KatzJEAakhusM (eds) Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–169.
35.
LomborgSThylstrupNBSchwartzJ (2018) The temporal flows of self-tracking: checking in, moving on, staying hooked. New Media & Society20(12): 4590–4607.
36.
LuWHamptonKN (2017) Beyond the power of networks: differentiating network structure from social media affordances for perceived social support. New Media & Society19(6): 861–879.
37.
MannellK (2019) A typology of mobile messaging’s disconnective affordances. Mobile Media & Communication7(1): 76–93.
38.
MeadGH (1934) Mind, Self and Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39.
MerollaAJHansiaAHallJA, et al. (2021) Moments of connection for the disconnected: people with negative relations with others experience less, but benefit more from, positive everyday interaction. Communication Research49(6): 838–862.
40.
MulvinD (2017) The media of high-resolution time: temporal frequencies as infrastructural resources. Information Society33(5): 282–290.
41.
NeverlaI (1992) Fernseh-zeit: Zuschauer zwischen Zeitkalkül und Zeitvertreib: eine Untersuchung zur Fernsehnutzung. München: Ölschläger.
42.
PrommerE (2019) Polychronicity during simultaneity: mediated time and mobile media. In: HartmannMPrommerEDecknerK, et al. (eds) Mediated Time: Perspectives on Time in a Digital Age. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 299–320.
43.
R Core Team (2019) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
44.
ReevesBRamNRobinsonTN, et al. (2021) Screenomics: a framework to capture and analyze personal life experiences and the ways that technology shapes them. Human–computer Interaction36(2): 150–201.
45.
RettieR (2009) SMS: exploiting the interactional characteristics of near-synchrony. Information, Communication & Society12(8): 1131–1148.
46.
RevelleW (2020) Psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
47.
RheeLBayerJBHedstromA (2020) Experience sampling method. In: Van den BulckJ (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology. London: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1–5.
48.
RosaH (2003) Social acceleration: ethical and political consequences of a desynchronized high-speed society. Constellations10(1): 3–33.
49.
RosaH (2015) Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.
50.
Schnauber-StockmannAKarnowskiV (2020) Mobile devices as tools for media and communication research: a scoping review on collecting self-report data in repeated measurement designs. Communication Methods and Measures14(3): 145–164.
51.
SchuurmanNKFerrerEde Boer-SonnenscheinM, et al. (2016) How to compare cross-lagged associations in a multilevel autoregressive model. Psychological Methods21(2): 206–221.
52.
SharmaS (2013) It changes space and time! Introducing power-chronography. In: PackerJCrofts WileySB (eds) Communication Matters: Materialist Approaches to Media, Mobility and Networks. Oxford: Routledge, pp. 66–77.
53.
SharmaS (2014) In the Meantime: Temporality and Cultural Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
54.
SyvertsenT (2020) Digital Detox: The Politics of Disconnecting. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
55.
ThulinEVilhelmsonBSchwanenT (2019) Absent friends? Smartphones, mediated presence, and the recoupling of online social contact in everyday life. Annals of the American Association of Geographers110(1): 166–183.
56.
TrieuPBayerJBEllisonNB, et al. (2019) Who likes to be reachable? Availability preferences, weak ties, and bridging social capital. Information, Communication, & Society22(8): 1096–1111.
57.
TurkleS (2016) Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. New York: Penguin.
58.
ValkenburgPBeyensIPouwelsJL, et al. (2021) Social media use and adolescents’ self-esteem: heading for a person-specific media effects paradigm. Journal of Communication71(1): 56–78.
59.
Vanden AbeeleMDe WolfRLingR (2018) Mobile media and social space: how anytime, anyplace connectivity structures everyday life. Media and Communication6(2): 5–14.
60.
VirilioP (2006) Speed and Politics. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
61.
WajcmanJ (2008) Life in the fast lane? Towards a sociology of technology and time. The British Journal of Sociology59(1): 59–77.
62.
WajcmanJ (2015) Pressed for Time: The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
63.
WestonSJRitchieSJRohrerJM, et al. (2019) Recommendations for increasing the transparency of analysis of preexisting data sets. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science2(3): 214–227.
64.
WickhamH (2016) Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
65.
WittmannM (2016) Felt Time: The Psychology of How We Perceive Time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66.
Ytre-ArneBSyvertsenTMoeH, et al. (2020) Temporal ambivalences in smartphone use: conflicting flows, conflicting responsibilities. New Media & Society22(9): 1715–1732.
