Based on joint media engagement (JME) and parental mediation theory (PMT), this study conducted a textual and thematic analysis of 360 user-generated content videos to explore, in the family scenario, smart speaker use behavior between Chinese children and parents. The findings reveal the following: (a) smart speakers create a new JME model and new co-use scenarios; (b) the mediation strategy used by parents differs from the mediation strategies in traditional PMT; (c) smart speakers are social actors and play a mediating role in the construction of family relationships; and (d) smart speaker use behavior between parents and children is characterized by a return to the living room era, which creates a new family dynamic and a reshaping of family politics.
BallagasRDuganTRevelleG, et al. (2013) Electric agents. In: Proceedings of the 20 conference on computer supported cooperative work—CSCW ’13, San Antonio, TX, 23–27 February.
2.
BeneteauEBooneAWuY, et al. (2020) Parenting with Alexa: exploring the introduction of smart speakers on family dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Honolulu, HI, 25–30 April.
3.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
4.
BrehmSBrehmJ (1981) Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. New York: Academic Press.
5.
BuW (1996) A study on children’s media needs—television, books, and video game consoles as examples. Journalism & Communication3: 3–24.
6.
ChakroffJLNathansonAI (2008) Parent and School Interventions: Mediation and Media Literacy. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
7.
ChambersD (2012) “Wii play as a family”: the rise in family-centered video gaming. Leisure Studies31(1): 69–82.
8.
ClarkL (2011) Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory21(4): 323–343.
9.
EastinMSGreenbergBSHofschireL (2006) Parenting the internet. Journal of Communication56(3): 486–504.
10.
FikkersKPiotrowskiJValkenburgP (2017) A matter of style? Exploring the effects of parental mediation styles on early adolescents’ media violence exposure and aggression. Computers in Human Behavior70: 407–415.
11.
GanY (2020) Video analysis as research method: looking backward and looking forward. Journalism & Communication27(2): 25–41+126.
12.
GuzmanALLewisSC (2019) Artificial intelligence and communication: a human-machine communication research agenda. New Media & Society22(8): 70–86.
13.
HeathCHindmarshJLuffP (2010) Video in Qualitative Research: Analysing Social Interaction in Everyday Life. London: SAGE.
14.
JiowHLimS (2012) The evolution of video game affordances and implications for parental mediation. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society32(6): 455–462.
15.
JiowHLimSLinJ (2016) Level up! refreshing parental mediation theory for our digital media landscape. Communication Theory27(3): 309–328.
16.
KrcmarMCingelD (2016) Examining two theoretical models predicting American and Dutch parents’ mediation of adolescent social media use. Journal of Family Communication16(3): 247–262.
17.
LauJZimmermanBSchaubF (2018) Alexa, are you listening? Privacy perceptions, concerns and privacy-seeking behaviors with smart speakers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction2: 102.
18.
LeeKLeeKYSheehanL (2020) Hey Alexa! a magic spell of social glue? Sharing a smart voice assistant speaker and its impact on users’ perception of group harmony. Information Systems Frontiers22: 563–583.
19.
LivingstoneSÓlafssonKHelsperEJ, et al. (2017) Maximizing opportunities and minimizing risks for children online: the role of digital skills in emerging strategies of parental mediation. Journal of Communication67(1): 82–105.
20.
LovatoSPiperAM (2015) “Siri, is this you?” Understanding young children’s interactions with voice input systems. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on interaction design and children, Boston, MA, 21–24 June.
21.
LuYLaiC (2020) Occupational visibility on short video platforms: a case study of Tiktok. Journal of International Communication42(6): 23–39.
22.
LuoLXWangBWangXL (2021) Function, relation and metaphysic: how users interact with smart speakers from the perspective of human-machine communication?Global Journal of Media Studies8(3): 102–118.
23.
McGuireS (2011) The Media City: Media, Architecture and Urban Space, Translated by Wei-Wen Chao. Morton Grove, IL: Publication International Ltd.
24.
MehusSStevensRDuganT (2011) How do children watch “interactive” television? Insights from an observational study. In: TakeuchiLStevensR (eds) The New Coviewing: Designing for Learning through Joint Media Engagement. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center, pp. 19–22.
25.
NathansonA (2002) The unintended effects of parental mediation of television on adolescents. Media Psychology4(3): 207–230.
26.
PaayJKjeldskovJSkovM, et al. (2012) Cooking together: a digital ethnography. In: CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Austin, TX, 5–10 May.
27.
PorcheronMFischerJEReevesS, et al. (2018) Voice interfaces in everyday life. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Montreal, QC, Canada, 21–26 April.
28.
RasmussenEShaferAColwellM, et al. (2016) Relation between active mediation, exposure to Daniel Tiger’s Neighborhood, and US preschoolers’ social and emotional development. Journal of Children and Media10(4): 443–461.
29.
SciutoASainiAForlizziJ, et al. (2018) “Hey Alexa, what’s up?”: a mixed-methods studies of in-home conversational agent usage. In: Proceedings of the 2018 designing interactive systems conference, Hong Kong, 9–13 June.
30.
ShinWLwinMO (2017) How does “talking about the internet with others” affect teenagers experience of online risks? the role of active mediation by parents, peers, and school teachers. New Media & Society19(7): 1109–1126.
31.
SoenensBVansteenkisteM (2010) A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control: proposing new insights on the basis of self-determination theory. Developmental Review30(1): 74–99.
32.
StevensRPenuelWR (2010) Studying and fostering learning through joint media engagement. In: Paper presented at the principal investigators meeting of the National Science Foundation’s science of learning centers, Washington, DC, 3–5 March.
33.
TakeuchiLStevensR (2011) The New Coviewing: Designing for Learning through Joint Media Engagement. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.
34.
ValkenburgPPiotrowskiJHermannsJ, et al. (2013) Developing and validating the perceived parental media mediation scale: a self-determination perspective. Human Communication Research39(4): 445–469.
35.
Van PetegemSDe FerrerreESoenensB, et al. (2019) Parents’ degree and style of restrictive mediation of young children’s digital gaming: associations with parental attitudes and perceived child adjustment. Journal of Child and Family Studies28(5): 1379–1391.
36.
WallaceWL (1971) The Logic of Science in Sociology. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction Inc.
37.
WhiteSRasmussenEKingA (2015) Restrictive mediation and unintended effects: serial multiple mediation analysis explaining the role of reactance in US adolescents. Journal of Children and Media9(4): 510–527.
38.
ZamanBNouwenMVanattenhovenJ, et al. (2016) A qualitative inquiry into the contextualized parental mediation practices of young children’s digital media use at home. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media60(1): 1–22.
