Serendipity on radio and streaming: Between musical discovery and recognition

Abstract

This article seeks to discuss, within the scope of radio and audio media studies, how serendipity articulates discovery, memory and recognition, standing at the heart of current Music Streaming Platforms’ rhetoric and musical culture. Fortuitous discovery mobilizes affections and helps to build bonds (either with platforms or radio stations), representing a major role in music innovation and circulation. Combining a range of current Global South references with critical theories on media and memory, we address similarities and differences between music programming and curation on radio and streaming, refuting computer scientists’ ambition to engineer serendipitous experiences and highlighting that serendipity must be correlated with the listeners’ sociocultural background. We conclude that acknowledging the complexity of serendipity opens doors for thinking of critical issues concerning musical consumption, conditions of listening, identity, representation and audio media agency. These are central themes in restructuring of the music industry, in a context of platformization.

Keywords

Audio media curation discovery memory music prescription programming serendipity streaming radio recognition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adorno

(1945) A social critique of radio music. The Kenyon Review 7(2): 208–217.

Adorno

(1991) On the fetish character in music and the regression of listening. In: Bernstein

(ed.) The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture. London: Routledge, pp. 29–60.

Adorno

Horkheimer

(1985) Dialética do esclarecimento: Fragmentos filosóficos. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: J. Zahar.

Ahlkvist

(2001) Programming philosophies and the rationalization of music radio. Media, Culture & Society 23(3): 339–358.

Ahlkvist

Faulkner

(1995) ‘Will this record work for us?’ Managing music formats in commercial radio. Qualitative Sociology 25(2): 189–215.

Ahlkvist

Fisher

(2000) And the hits just keep on coming: music programming standardization in commercial radio. Poetics 27(5-6): 301–325.

Blake

(2020) Data shows 90 percent of streams go to the top 1 percent of artists. Rolling Stone, 9 September. Available at: https://www.rollingstone.com/pro/news/top-1-percent-streaming-1055005/ (accessed 4 March 2022).

Brewster

Broughton

(2014) Last Night a DJ Saved My Life: The History of the Disc Jockey. 3rd ed. New York: Grove Press.

Cardoso Filho

(2008) Emergência do sentido na canção midiática: uma proposta metodológica. Intexto. Porto Alegre: UFRGS 1(18): 47–63.

10.

De Marchi

(2016) A destruição criadora da indústria fonográfica brasileira, 1999-2009: dos discos físicos ao comércio digital de música. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Folio Digital.

11.

De Marchi

Kischinhevsky

Ferreira

, et al. (2021) O gosto algorítmico: A lógica dos sistemas de recomendação automática de música em serviços de streaming. Fronteiras 23(3): 16–26.

12.

Denisoff

(1973) The evolution of pop music broadcasting: 1920-1972. Popular Music and Society 2(3): 202–226.

13.

Drott

(2018) Why the next song matters: streaming, recommendation, scarcity. Twentieth-Century Music 15: 325–357.

14.

Durand

(1993) A Imaginação Simbólica. Lisboa: Edições.

15.

Ekstrand

Tian

Azpiazu

, et al. (2017) Scripts for all the cool kids, how do they fit in. Computer Science Faculty Scripts and Data 4. Available at: http://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/ekstrand18b/ekstrand18b.pdf

16.

Epps-Darling

Cramer

Bouyer

(2020) Artist gender representation in music streaming. ISMIR 248–254. Available at: https://program.ismir2020.net/static/final_papers/148.pdf

17.

Ferraro

Serra

Bauer

(2021) Break the loop: gender imbalance in music recommenders. In: Proceedings of the 2021 conference on human information interaction and retrieval, pp. 249–254. Available at: https://www.christinebauer.eu/publications/ferraro-2021-break-the-loop/ferraro-2021-break-the-loop.pdf

18.

Ferreira

(2020) O Formato Playlist: a prescrição musical entre filosofias de programação radiofônica e engenharias da experiência musical automática. Doctoral Thesis, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Available at: https://www.bdtd.uerj.br:8443/handle/1/16581 (accessed 4 March 2022).

19.

Foster

Ellis

(2014) Serendipity and its study. Journal of Documentation 70(6): 1015–1038.

20.

Frith

(1996) Performing Rites: On the Value of Popular Music. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

21.

Gallego Pérez

(2011) Novas formas de prescrição musical. In: Herschmann

(ed.) Nas bordas e/ou fora do mainstream: novas tendências da indústria da música independente no início do século XXI. São Paulo, Brazil: Estação Das Letras E Das Cores, pp. 47–60.

22.

Gallego Pérez

(2015) User-generated playlists: radio music programming in the age of peer-to-peer production, distribution and consumption. In: Bonini

Monclús

(eds) Radio Audiences and Participation in the Age of Network Society. New York: Routledge, pp. 195–211.

23.

Gambaro

(2019) A instituição social do rádio: (Re)agregando as práticas discursivas da indústria no ecossistema midiático. Doctoral Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Brazil. Available at: https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/27/27161/tde-23072019-105047/pt-br.php (accessed 4 March 2022).

24.

Gambaro

Vicente

Ramos

(2018) Music promotion in Brazil: from ‘caitituagem’ to the challenges of digital competition. Contracampo 37(2): 127–145.

25.

Herschmann

(2010) Indústria da música em transição. São Paulo, Brazil: Ed. Estação das Letras e Cores.

26.

Hesbacher

(1974) Sound exposure in radio: the misleading nature of the station playlist. Popular Music and Society 3: 189–202.

27.

International Federation of Phonographic Industry (IFPI) (2021) Global Music Report. Available at: https://gmr2021.ifpi.org/report (accessed 1 March 2022).

28.

Kischinhevsky

(2011a) For a political economy of music radio—links between the industries of music and of radio broadcasting. Matrizes, USP 5(1): 247–258.

29.

Kischinhevsky

(2011b) O rádio e a música independente no Brasil. In: Herschmann

(ed.) Nas bordas e fora do mainstream musical. Novas tendências da música independente no início do século XXI. São Paulo, Brazil: Estação Das Letras e Cores. Availan, pp. 165–185.

30.

Kischinhevsky

Ferreira

Góes

, et al. (2021) Between algorithm and curation—Radio programming, music genres and repetition. Comunicação, Mídia E Consumo 18(51): 141–161.

31.

Kischinhevsky

Vicente

De Marchi

(2015) Em busca da música infinita: os serviços de streaming e os conflitos de interesse no mercado de conteúdos digitais. Revista Fronteiras 17(3): 302–311.

32.

Kotkov

Wang

Veijalainen

(2016) A survey of serendipity in recommender systems. Knowledge-Based Systems 111: 180–192.

33.

Liang

R-H

(2012) Designing for unexpected encounters with digital products: case studies of serendipity as felt experience. International Journal of Design 6(1): 41–58.

34.

McCay-Peet

Toms

(2010) The process of serendipity in knowledge work. In: Proceedings of the third symposium on Information interaction in context (IIiX ‘10), New Brunswick, NJ, 18–21 August, pp. 377-382. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

35.

Makri

Blandford

Woods

, et al. (2014) ‘Making my own luck’: serendipity strategies and how to support them in digital information environments. The Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (JASIST) 65(11): 2179–2194.

36.

Music Business Worldwide (MBW) (2018) Warner sells entire stake in Spotify, crediting artists with $126m of the money. Music Business Worldwide, 7 August. Available at: https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/warner-sells-entire-stake-in-spotify-crediting-artists-with-126m-as-a-result/ (accessed 4 March 2022).

37.

Music Business Worldwide (MBW) (2020) It’s happened: ‘The major labels are now generating over $1m every hour from streaming’. Music Business Worldwide, 25 February. Available at: https://bit.ly/3hxSnzb (accessed 4 March 2022).

38.

Merton

Barber

(2004) The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity: A Study in Sociological Semantics and the Sociology of Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

39.

Morris

Powers

(2015) Control, curation and musical experience in streaming music services. Creative Industries Journal 8: 106–122.

40.

Morrison

(2010) Google CEO envisions a ‘serendipity engine’. The Wall Street Journal, 29 September. Available at: https://on.wsj.com/3IJ8u8R (acessed 31 January 2022).

41.

MRC Data and Billboard (2021) Year-end report US 2021. New York: Billboard. Available at: https://bit.ly/3vCJTyH (accessed 15 February 2022).

42.

Nielsen (2018) And the winner is. . . Radio listeners preferred Classic Hits during the summer of 2018. Nielsen Media, 11 September. Available at: https://bit.ly/3sCZBIf (acessed 1 March 2022).

43.

Paz

(1984) A tradição da ruptura. In: Paz

(ed.) Os filhos do barro. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Nova Fronteira, pp. 17–35.

44.

Pickering

Keightley

(2020) As modalidades da nostalgia (trans M

Salomão Brück

Lopes

). Revista Dispositiva 9(15): 7–33.

45.

Pollak

(1992) Memória e identidade social. Estudos Históricos, Rio de Janeiro 5(10): 200–212.

46.

Prey

(2019) Background by design: listening in the age of streaming. Naxos Musicology International 1: 1–10.

47.

Radios.com.br (2022) Estatísticas: Web rádios mais ouvidas em dezembro de 2021. Available at: https://bit.ly/3sCHulY (accessed 1 March 2022).

48.

Ricoeur

(2007) A memória, a história, o esquecimento. Campinas, Brazil: Unicamp.

49.

Rothenbuhler

(1985) Programming decision making in popular music radio. Communication Research 12(2): 209–232.

50.

Runtagh

(2017) Fleetwood Mac’s ‘rumours’: 10 things you didn’t know. Rolling Stone, 3 February. Available at: https://bit.ly/3pwVpbm (accessed 31 Jan 2022).

51.

Sauer

Copeland

(2021) Wa/ondering with data—or, responsibly measuring socio-technical serendipity in the urban environment. In: IEEE international smart cities conference (ISC2), Manchester, 7–10 September, pp. 1–4. New York: IEEE.

52.

Smets

(2022) Designing for serendipity: a means or an end? Journal of Documentation. Epub ahead of print August. DOI: 10.1108/JD-12-2021-0234.

53.

Sterne

(2012) MP3: The Meaning of a Format. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

54.

Stiernstedt

(2015) The automatic DJ? Control, automation and creativity in commercial music radio. In: Bonini

Monclús

(eds) Radio Audiences and Participation in the Age of Network Society. New York: Routledge, pp. 137–153.

55.

Stone

(2016) The Value of Popular Music: An Approach from Post-Kantian Aesthetics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

56.

Thompson

(1995) A mídia e a modernidade—Uma teoria social da mídia. Petrópolis, Brazil: Ed. Vozes.

57.

TudoRádio (2021) Panorama: Rádio Melodia cresce e abre vantagem na liderança de audiência no Rio de Janeiro. FM O Dia e JB FM seguem no top 3. Tudorádio.com , 10 December. Available at: https://bit.ly/36U3dxb (accessed 1 March 2022).

58.

TudoRádio (2022) Panorama: Rádio de São Paulo crava mais uma alta de audiência e renova melhor marca desde 2018. Tudorádio.com , 11 January. Available at: https://bit.ly/35PsCHG (accessed 1 March 2022).

59.

Vargas

Brück

(2017) Between rupture and resumption: criticism on the dominant memory of bossa nova. Matrizes 11(3): 221–239.

60.

Vechiato

de Farias

(2020) Serendipidade no contexto da Ciência da Informação: perspectivas para os estudos com sujeitos informacionais. Encontros Bibli: Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação 25: 1–23.

61.

Vicente

(2014) Da Vitrola ao iPod: uma história da indústria fonográfica no Brasil. São Paulo, Brazil: Alameda Editorial.

62.

Vicente

Kischinhevsky

De Marchi

(2018) A consolidação dos serviços de streaming e os desafios à diversidade musical no Brasil. Eptic On-Line (UFS) 20: 25–42. Available at: https://seer.ufs.br/index.php/eptic/article/view/8578 (accessed 1 March 2022).

63.

Villermet

Poiroux

Moussallam

, et al. (2021) Follow the guides: disentangling human and algorithmic curation in online music consumption. In: Recsys ’21, Amsterdam, 27 September–1 October. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.03915.pdf

64.

Ziarani

Ravanmehr

(2021) Serendipity in recommender systems: a systematic literature review. Journal of Computer Science and Technology 36(2): 375–396.