As video game production is becoming increasingly data-driven, player surveillance shapes the everyday realities of users and developers. Remote online tracking and the resulting optimization and governance of in-game activity subscribe to the Big Data methodology as a way of accounting for entire player populations. By design, player surveillance serves the interests of developers and publishers, who have exclusive access to this proprietary data. Yet, discursively, these parties attempt to present surveillance as a mutually beneficial endeavor aimed at improving video games. A part of this strategy is the video game industry’s selective information disclosure, which I explore empirically on the example of telemetry infographics. Based on a thematic analysis of 200 infographics from 127 games, I show how publicly disseminated infographics contribute to the normalization of player surveillance by presenting it as a source of harmless trivia to be collected and shared by fans and the specialized press.
AielloG (2020) Inventorizing, situating, transforming: social semiotics and data visualization. In: EngebretsenMHelenK (eds) Data Visualization in Society. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 49–62.
2.
Amit-DanhiERShifmanL (2018) Digital political infographics: a rhetorical palette of an emergent genre. New Media & Society20(10): 3540–3559.
3.
AyresL (2008) Thematic coding and analysis. In: GivenLM (ed.) The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, pp. 868–868.
4.
BatemanJAWildfeuerJHiippalaT (2017) Multimodality: Foundations, Research and Analysis a Problem-Oriented Introduction. Boston, MA: De Gruyter/Mouton.
Blizzard Entertainment (2004) World of Warcraft. Irvine, CA: Blizzard Entertainment.
7.
boyddCrawfordK (2012) Critical questions for Big Data. Information, Communication & Society15(5): 662–679.
8.
CairoA (2013) The Functional Art: An Introduction to Information Graphics and Visualization. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
9.
CanossaA (2014) Reporting from the snooping trenches: changes in attitudes and perceptions towards behavior tracking in digital games. Surveillance & Society12(3): 433–436.
10.
ConsalvoM (2007) Cheating: Gaining Advantage in Videogames. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
CouldryNMejiasUA (2019) Data colonialism: rethinking Big Data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media20(4): 336–349.
12.
Crytek (2019) Hunt: Showdown. Frankfurt am Main: Crytek.
DrachenASeif El-NasrMCanossaA (2013) Game analytics—the basics. In: Seif El-NasrMDrachenACanossaA (eds) Game Analytics: Maximizing the Value of Player Data. London: Springer, pp. 13–40.
15.
EglistonB (2020) Quantified play: self-tracking in videogames. Games and Culture15(6): 707–729.
16.
Epic Games (2017) Fortnite. Cary, NC: Epic Games.
17.
FieldsTV (2013) Game industry metrics terminology and analytics case study. In: Seif El-NasrMDrachenACanossaA (eds) Game Analytics: Maximizing the Value of Player Data. London: Springer, pp. 53–71.
HeimoOIHarviainenJTKimppaKK, et al. (2018) Virtual to virtuous money: a virtue ethics perspective on video game business logic. Journal of Business Ethics153: 95–103.
23.
HillRL (2020) What is at stake in data visualization? A feminist critique of the rhetorical power of data visualizations in the media. In: EngebretsenMHelenK (eds) Data Visualization in Society. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 49–62.
24.
JakobssonM (2011) The achievement machine: understanding Xbox 360 achievements in gaming practices. Game Studies11(1). Available at: http://gamestudies.org/1101/articles/jakobsson (accessed 30 May 2018).
25.
KennedyHEngebretsenM (2020) Introduction: the relationships between graphs, charts, maps and meanings, feelings, engagements. In: EngebretsenMHelenK (eds) Data Visualization in Society. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 19–32.
26.
KerrA (2017) Global Games: Production, Circulation and Policy in the Networked Era. New York: Routledge.
27.
KlingerB (2006) Beyond the Multiplex: Cinema, New Technologies, and the Home. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
28.
KocurekCA (2015) Coin-Operated Americans: Rebooting Boyhood at the Video Game Arcade. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
29.
LeaverT (2017) Intimate surveillance: normalizing parental monitoring and mediation of infants online. Social Media + Society3(2): 1–10.
30.
LuptonD (2016) The Quantified Self: A Sociology of Self-Tracking. Cambridge: Polity.
31.
MannSNolanJWellmanB (2003) Sousveillance: inventing and using wearable computing devices for data collection in surveillance environments. Surveillance & Society1(3): 331–355.
32.
MedlerB (2009) Generations of game analytics, achievements and high scores. Eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Culture3(2): 177–194.
MorseJ (2018) Reframing rigor in qualitative inquiry. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. 5th ed.Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, pp. 1364–1398.
35.
MurphyD (2014) Battle on the metric front: dispatches from call of duty’s update war. Game Studies14(2). Available at: http://gamestudies.org/1402/articles/murphy (accessed 12 May 2016).
36.
NærlandTU (2020) The political significance of data visualization: four key perspectives. In: EngebretsenMHelenK (eds) Data Visualization in Society. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 63–73.
37.
NevilleSJ (2021) The domestication of privacy-invasive technology on YouTube: unboxing the Amazon Echo with the online warm expert. Convergence27(5): 1288–1307.
38.
NicollBKeoghB (2019) The Unity Game Engine and the Circuits of Cultural Software. Cham: Palgrave Pivot.
39.
NieborgDBPoellT (2018) The platformization of cultural production: theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society20(11): 4275–4292.
40.
O’DonnellC (2014) Developer’s Dilemma: The Secret World of Videogame Creators (Inside Technology). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
41.
PerreaultGVosT (2020) Metajournalistic discourse on the rise of gaming journalism. New Media & Society22(1): 159–176.
42.
Seif El-NasrMKleinmanE (2020) Data-driven game development: ethical considerations. In: International conference on the foundations of digital games (FDG ’20), Bugibba Malta, 15 September, pp. 1–10. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
43.
Seif El-NasrMDrachenACanossaA (eds) (2013) Game Analytics: Maximizing the Value of Player Data. London: Springer.
44.
ŠvelchJ (2016) “Footage Not Representative”: Redefining Paratextuality for the Analysis of Official Communication in the Video Game Industry. In: DuretCPonsC-M (eds) Contemporary Research on Intertextuality in Video Games. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 297–315.
45.
ŠvelchJ (2019) Resisting the perpetual update: Struggles against protocological power in video games. New Media & Society21(7): 1594–1612.
46.
Van RoesselLŠvelchJ (2021) Who Creates Microtransactions: The Production Context of Video Game Monetization. In: SotamaaOŠvelchJ (eds) Game Production Studies. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 197–215.
47.
VellemanPFWilkinsonL (1993) Nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio typologies are misleading. The American Statistician47(1): 65–72.
WayneML (2022) Netflix audience data, streaming industry discourse, and the emerging realities of “popular” television. Media, Culture & Society44: 193–209.
50.
WeberW (2017) Interactive information graphics: a framework for classifying a visual genre. In: BlackALunaPLundO, et al. (eds) Information Design: Research and Practice. London: Routledge, pp. 243–256.
51.
WerderKSeidelSReckerJ, et al. (2020) Data-driven, data-informed, data-augmented: how Ubisoft’s Ghost Recon Wildlands live unit uses data for continuous product innovation. California Management Review62(3): 86–102.
52.
WeststarJ (2015) Understanding video game developers as an occupational community. Information, Communication & Society18(10): 1238–1252.
53.
WhitsonJR (2019) The new spirit of capitalism in the game industry. Television & New Media20(8): 789–801.
54.
ZuboffS (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. 1st ed. New York: PublicAffairs.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
