The social side of cryptocurrency: Exploring the investors’ ideological realities from Romanian Facebook groups

Abstract

The complexity of blockchain technologies is reflected in the various ways in which social actors operate with crypto transactions, and this is seen in the wide range of discourses and practices adopted on the crypto market. Using social constructivism, this study highlights the fact that social practices in the crypto area respect certain thematic ideologies, through which individual discourses reflect different pragmatic expectations in relation to virtually encrypted transactions. Drawing on inductive thematic analysis based on 38 semi-structured interviews with Romanian investors, four major themes emerge: (1) unbreakable power of code encompasses rather libertarian discourses on potential state policies, (2) key role of peers explains the investments in the crypto market as a form of community membership, (3) assuming plenty of risks highlights the discourses focused on substantial and unpredictable gains, and (4) preferring safety above all encompasses discourses on financial stability through rather conservative behaviors.

Keywords

code crypto market exploratory research ideologies legitimacy social constructivism thematic analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anghel

(2020) 12 milioane de români au cont pe Facebook și doar 400.000 pe Twitter. Care este explicația [12 million Romanians have a Facebook account and only 400.000 on Twitter. What is the explanation]. Aleph News. Available at: https://alephnews.ro/media/12-milioane-de-romani-au-cont-pe-facebook-si-doar-400-000-pe-twitter-care-este-explicatia/ (accessed 30 January 2022).

Beck

(1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: SAGE.

Benea

(2021) Tun pe piața crypto din România: zeci de milioane de dolari produși cu „boți” în câteva minute [Cannon on the Romanian crypto market: tens of millions of dollars produced with “bots” in a few minutes]. Europa Liberă România, 21 December. Available at: https://romania.europalibera.org/a/lansare-ride-maiar-exchange/31616379.html (accessed 31 January 2022).

Berger

Luckmann

(1967) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor.

Bijker

Hughes

Pinch

(1999) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Braun

Clarke

(2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101.

Browne

(2021) Bitcoin falls after Elon Musk tweets breakup meme. CNBC, 4 June. Available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/04/bitcoin-falls-after-elon-musk-tweets-breakup-meme.html?fbclid=IwAR1yXitcUkPecdB6aeka1zM5LnlqDGh1l__QpG9RKnVx3fRqmkkELh5VL7w (accessed 29 September 2021).

Brunton

(2019) Digital Cash. The Unknown History of the Anarchists, Utopians, and Technologists Who Built Cryptocurrency. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Calvão

(2019) Crypto-miners: Digital labor and the power of blockchain technology. Economic Anthropology 6(1): 123–134.

10.

Cornea

(2021) Cât au românii în bitcoin? [How many Bitcoins do Romanians have?]. Ziarul Financiar, 16 January. Available at: https://www.zf.ro/zf-live/cat-au-romanii-bitcoin-convins-romanii-au-peste-1-mld-euro-bitcoin-19862240 (accessed 1 February 2022).

11.

De Filippi

Mannan

Reijers

(2020) Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance. Technology in Society 62: 101284.

12.

DeMatteo

(2022) There Are Thousands of Different Altcoins. Here’s Why Crypto Investors Should Pass on Most of Them. Nextadvisor, 27 January. Available at: https://time.com/nextadvisor/investing/cryptocurrency/altcoins/ (accessed 31 January 2022).

13.

DeVries

(2016) An analysis of cryptocurrency, bitcoin, and the future. International Journal of Business Management and Commerce 1(2): 1–9.

14.

Dodd

(2017) The social life of Bitcoin. Theory, Culture & Society 35: 35–56.

15.

Dodds

(2021) Crypto Bear Markets: What Are They? Sofi. Available at: https://www.sofi.com/learn/content/crypto-bear-market/ (accessed 15 September 2021).

16.

Donaldson

Conway

(2015) User conceptions of trustworthiness for digital archival documents. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66(12): 2427–2444.

17.

Earle

(2009) Trust, Confidence, and the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. Risk Analysis 29(6): 785–792.

18.

Elo

Kyngäs

(2008) The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing 62(1): 107–115.

19.

Giddens

(1991) Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity.

20.

January

(2021) Cryptocurrencies and the Blockchain Revolution: Bitcoin and beyond. Minneapolis, MN: Twenty-First Century Books.

21.

Karlstrøm

(2014) Do libertarians dream of electric coins? The material embeddedness of Bitcoin. Distinktion 15(1): 23–36.

22.

Kjærland

Meland

Oust

, et al. (2018) How can bitcoin price fluctuations be explained. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 8: 323–332.

23.

Lee

(2019) A decentralized token economy: how blockchain and cryptocurrency can revolutionize business. Business Horizons 62(6): 773–784.

24.

Marella

Upreti

Merikivi

, et al. (2020) Understanding the creation of trust in cryptocurrencies: the case of Bitcoin. Electronic Markets 30: 259–271.

25.

Maurer

Nelms

Swartz

(2013) “When perhaps the real problem is money itself!” The practical materiality of Bitcoin. Social Semiotics 23(2): 261–277.

26.

Morkunas

Paschen

Boon

(2019) How blockchain technologies impact your business model. Business Horizons 62(3): 295–306.

27.

Musk

(2021) #Bitcoin [Tweet]. Twitter, 4 June. Availabela t: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1400620080090730501

28.

Nakamoto

(2008) Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Available at: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf (accessed 10 September 2021).

29.

Plantin

Lagoze

Edwards

, et al. (2018) Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society 20(1): 293–310.

30.

Radu

(2021) Non-fungible tokens (NFTs)–regulation vacuum and challenges for Romania. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International RAIS Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities, 15-16 August, pp. 137–143. Scientia Moralitas Research Institute. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/smo/lpaper/0102.html

31.

Shen

Galbraith

(2021) Cryptocurrency exchanges scramble to drop Chinese users after Beijing’s ban. Reuters, 27 September. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/technology/cryptocurrency-exchanges-rush-cut-ties-with-chinese-users-after-fresh-crackdown-2021-09-27/ (accessed 30 September 2021).

32.

Siegel

(2016) Understanding The DAO Attack. CoinDesk, 25 June. Available at: https://www.coindesk.com/learn/2016/06/25/understanding-the-dao-attack/ (accessed 31 January 2022).

33.

Suchman

(2006) Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

34.

Swartz

(2018) What was Bitcoin, what will it be? The techno-economic imaginaries of a new money technology. Cultural Studies 32(4): 623–650.

35.

Swigunski

(2021) how cryptocurrency will transform the future business forever. Forbes, 22 April. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeswigunski/2021/04/17/how-cryptocurrency-will-transform-the-future-business-forever/ (accessed 13 September 2021).

36.

Tapscott

(2016) Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology behind Bitcoin Is Changing Money, Business, and the World. London: Penguin.

37.

Vidan

Lehdonvirta

(2018) Mine the gap: Bitcoin and the maintenance of trustlessness. New Media & Society 21(1): 42–59.

38.

Winner

(1980) Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109(1): 121–136.

39.

Woodall

Ringel

(2019) Blockchain archival discourse: Trust and the imaginaries of digital preservation. New Media & Society 22(12): 2200–2217.

40.

Zook

Blankenship

(2018) New spaces of disruption? The failures of Bitcoin and the rhetorical power of algorithmic governance. Geoforum 96: 248–255.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB