Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-9
Evolution of audience duplication networks among social networking sites: Exploring the influences of preferential attachment,audience size,and niche width
This study examines the evolution of social networking sites (SNSs) from a networked audience duplication perspective. Guided by social network theory, the theory of double jeopardy, and niche theory, this study proposes an integrated framework to explain the evolution of SNS choices of the US audience between 2016 and 2019. Shared traffic data were retrieved from comScore’s Media Metrix Multi-Platform database. The empirical results of the separable temporal exponential random graph model (STERGM) confirm that preferential attachment, audience size, and niche width significantly drive the likelihood of tie formation and dissolution in the evolving audience duplication network. These effects hold true even when other endogenous structural features and exogenous nodal attributes are taken into account. Theoretical implications for the networked media landscape are discussed.
AndersonC (2006) The Long Tail: How Endless Choice Is Creating Unlimited Demand. London: Random House Business Books.
2.
BarabásiALAlbertR (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science286(5439): 509–512.
3.
BarnettGA (2011) Communication and the evolution of SNS: cultural convergence perspective. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia10(1): 43–54.
4.
BarnettGAChungCJParkHW (2011) Uncovering transnational hyperlink patterns and web-mediated contents: a new approach based on Cracking.com domain. Social Science Computer Review29(3): 369–384.
5.
BarnettGAJiangKHammondJR (2015) The use of coherencies to examine network evolution and co-evolution. Social Network Analysis and Mining5: 53.
6.
BarnettGAParkHWChungCJ (2016) Evolution of the international hyperlink network. Journal of Global Information Technology Management19(3): 1–16.
7.
boyd dm and EllisonNB (2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13(1): 210–230.
8.
BreigerRL (1974) The duality of persons and groups. Social Forces53(2): 181–190.
9.
CarrollGRDobrevSDSwaminathanA (2002) Organizational processes of resource partitioning. Research in Organizational Behavior24: 1–40.
DimmickJ (2003) Media Competition and Coexistence: The Theory of the Niche. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
ElberseA (2008) Should you invest in the long tail?Harvard Business Review86(7–8): 88–96.
14.
ElberseA (2013) Blockbusters: Hit-Making, Risk-Taking and the Big Business of Entertainment. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
15.
EllisonNBboydd (2013) Sociality through social network sites. In: DuttonWH (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 151–172.
16.
González-BailónSXenosM (2020) Surveys underestimate online news exposure: a comparison of self-reported and observational data in nine countries. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3522774 (accessed 18 November 2020).
HannanMTFreemanJ (1977) The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology82(5): 929–964.
19.
HillBMShawAD (2019) Studying populations of online communities. In: Foucault WellesBGonzález-BailónS (eds) The Handbook of Networked Communication. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 174–193.
20.
HunterDR (2007) Curved exponential family models for social networks. Social Networks29(2): 216–230.
KsiazekTB (2011) A network analytic approach to understanding cross-platform audience behavior. Journal of Media Economics24(4): 237–251.
23.
LaiCH (2014) Can our group survive? An investigation of the evolution of mixed-mode groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication19(4): 839–854.
24.
LeeSMongeP (2011) The coevolution of multiplex communication networks in organizational communities. Journal of Communication61(4): 758–799.
25.
LeifeldPCranmerSJ (2019) A theoretical and empirical comparison of the temporal exponential random graph model and the stochastic actor-oriented model. Network Science7(1): 20–51.
26.
LevyMA (2016) GWDegree: improving interpretation of geometrically-weighted degree estimates in exponential random graph models. Journal of Open Source Software1(3): 36.
27.
LinCA (2004) Webcasting adoption: technology fluidity, user innovativeness, and media substitution. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media48(3): 157–178.
28.
LowreyWKimE (2016) Hyperlocal news coverage: a population ecology perspective. Mass Communication and Society19(6): 694–714.
29.
McPheeWN (1963) Formal Theories of Mass Behavior. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
30.
Majó-VázquezSCardenalASGonzález-BailónS (2017) Digital news consumption and copyright intervention: evidence from Spain before and after the 2015 “Link Tax.”Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication22(5): 284–301.
31.
Majó-VázquezSNielsenRKGonzález-BailónS (2019) The backbone structure of audience networks: a new approach to comparing online news consumption across countries. Political Communication36(2): 227–240.
32.
MongePRContractorNS (2003) Theories of Communication Networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
MukerjeeSMajó-VázquezSGonzález-BailónS (2018) Networks of audience overlap in the consumption of digital news. Journal of Communication68(1): 26–50.
34.
NamYBarnettGA (2010) Communication media diffusion and substitutions: longitudinal trends from 1980 to 2005 in Korea. New Media & Society12(7): 1137–1155.
35.
NapoliPM (2003) Audience Economics: Media Institutions and the Audience Marketplace. New York: Columbia University Press.
36.
NelsonJL (2018) And deliver us to segmentation: the growing appeal of the niche news audience. Journalism Practice12(2): 204–219.
37.
OgnyanovaKMongeP (2013) A multitheoretical, multilevel, multidimensional network model of the media system: production, content, and audiences. Annals of the International Communication Association37(1): 67–93.
38.
PengTQLiuMWuY, et al. (2016) Follower-followee network, communication networks, and vote agreement of the U.S. members of congress. Communication Research43(7): 996–1024.
39.
RilesJMPilnyATewksburyD (2018) Media fragmentation in the context of bounded social networks: how far can it go?New Media & Society20(4): 1415–1432.
40.
RobinsGSnijdersTWangP, et al. (2007) Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks29(2): 192–215.
41.
ShumateMDewittL (2008) The north/south divide in NGO hyperlink networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13(2): 405–428.
42.
ShumateMLippS (2008) Connective collection action only: an examination of the hyperlink network structure of an NGO issue network. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication14(1): 178–201.
43.
StephensBChenWButlerJS (2016) Bubbling up the good ideas: a two-mode network analysis of an intra-organizational idea challenge. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication21(3): 210–229.
44.
TanejaH (2020) The myth of targeting small, but loyal niche audiences: double-jeopardy effects in digital-media consumption. Journal of Advertising Research60(3): 239–250.
45.
TanejaHWebsterJG (2016) How do global audiences take shape? The role of institutions and culture in patterns of Web use. Journal of Communication66(1): 161–182.
46.
TanejaHWuAXEdgerlyS (2018) Rethinking the generational gap in online news use: an infrastructural perspective. New Media & Society20(5): 1792–1812.
47.
WeberMS (2012) Newspapers and the long-term implications of hyperlinking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17(2): 187–201.
48.
WeberMSFulkJMongeP (2016) The emergence and evolution of social networking sites as an organizational form. Management Communication Quarterly30(3): 305–332.
49.
WebsterJG (2014) The Marketplace of Attention: How Audiences Take Shape in a Digital Age. Cambridge: MIT Press.
50.
WebsterJGKsiazekTB (2012) The dynamics of audience fragmentation: public attention in an age of digital media. Journal of Communication62(1): 39–56.
51.
WebsterJGTanejaH (2018) Building and interpreting audience networks: a response to Mukerjee, Majo-Vazquez & Gonzalez-Bailon. Journal of Communication68(3): E11–E14.
52.
WuAXTanejaH (2016) Reimagining Internet geographies: a user-centric ethnological mapping of the World Wide Web. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication21(3): 230–246.
53.
XuYFulkJMongeP (2020) Ecological influences on network tie dissolution in the evolution of affiliation networks in the International Communication Association, 2009–2015. Human Communication Research. Epub ahead of print 20 September. DOI: 10.1093/hcr/hqaa009.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
