This article discusses the role of giant social media corporations Facebook, Google (YouTube), and Twitter in counter-terrorism and countering violent extremisms (CT/CVEs). Based on a qualitative investigation mobilizing corporate communications as well as a collection of interviews with European stakeholders, it argues that these firms have become actors in this policy area of what is traditionally considered high politics, through their fundamental role in establishing and enforcing the nascent global governance regime on terrorist communications. Since the emergence of the self-proclaimed Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), the studied firms have displayed agency and creativity in their appropriation of this new responsibility, effectively going beyond what was legally required of them. After contextualizing and questioning their involvement, motivated by terrorist exploitation of their services, reputational pressure and the threat of legislation, the article provides an analysis of the firms’ self-regulated commitment to CT/CVE through policymaking, content moderation, human resources, and private multilateralism.
AbbottKWSnidalD (2009) The governance triangle: regulatory standards institutions and the shadow of the state. In: MattliWWoodsN (eds) The Politics of Global Regulation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 44–88.
2.
AbrahamsenRWilliamsMC (2010) Security beyond the State: Private Security in International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AbrahamsenRLeanderA (eds) (2016) Routledge Handbook of Private Security Studies. London; New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
4.
BadouardR (2020) Les Nouvelles Lois Du Web: Modération Et Censure [La République des idées]. Paris: Seuil.
5.
BadouardR (2021) Ce que peut l’État face aux plateformes. Pouvoirs N°177: 49–58.
6.
BalzacqT (ed) (2011) Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. PRIO new security studies. Abingdon; New York: Routledge.
7.
BergerJM (2016) Nazis Vs. ISIS on Twitter. Washington, DC: The Centre for Extremism at George Washington University.
8.
BeutelAWeinbergerP (2016) Public-private Partnerships to Counter Violent Extremism: Field Principles for Action. Final Report to the U.S. Department of State. College Park, Maryland: START.
BjolaCPammentJ (eds) (2019) Countering Online Propaganda and Extremism: The Dark Side of Digital Diplomacy [Routledge New Diplomacy Studies]. London ; New York: Routledge.
CocheE (2018) Privatised enforcement and the right to freedom of expression in a world confronted with terrorism propaganda online. Internet Policy Review7: 1382.
16.
CommonMF (2020) Fear the Reaper: how content moderation rules are enforced on social media. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology34: 126–152.
17.
ConwayM (2017) Determining the role of the internet in violent extremism and terrorism: six suggestions for progressing research. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism40(1): 77–98.
18.
ConwayM (2020) Routing the extreme right—challenges for social media platforms. The RUSI Journal165: 108–113.
19.
ConwayMKhawajaMLakhaniS, et al. (2017) Disrupting Daesh: measuring takedown of online terrorist material and its impacts. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism Policy Report. VOX-Pol.
20.
CruickshankP (2017) A View from the CT Foxhole: An Interview with Brian Fishman, Counterterrorism Policy Manager, Facebook. CTC Sentinel10(8): 8–12.
CulpepperPDThelenK (2020) Are we all Amazon primed? Consumers and the politics of platform power. Comparative Political Studies53(2): 288–318.
23.
de GoedeM (2018) The chain of security. Review of International Studies44: 24–42.
24.
DLD conference (2019) What Kind of Internet Do We Want? (Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook). DLD 19. DLD Conference. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbMo6nvlpsE (accessed 29 January 2021)
25.
Europol (2020) European Union Terrorism Situation and Trend Report 2020 (TE-SAT). The Hague: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.
FrazerONünlistC (2015) The Concept of Countering Violent Extremism (183, CSS Analyses in Security Policy). Zürich: Center for Security Studies, ETH Zürich.
31.
GaneshBBrightJ (2020) Countering extremists on social media: challenges for strategic communication and content moderation. Policy & Internet12(1): 6–19.
32.
GillespieT (2010) The politics of “platforms.”New Media & Society12(3): 347–364.
33.
GillespieT (2020) Content moderation, AI, and the question of scale. Big Data & Society7: 3234.
GorwaR (2019) The platform governance triangle: conceptualising the informal regulation of online content. Internet Policy Review8: 1407.
36.
GorwaRBinnsRKatzenbachC (2020) Algorithmic content moderation: technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data & Society7: 945.
HelbergerNPiersonJPoellT (2018) Governing online platforms: from contested to cooperative responsibility. The Information Society34(1): 1–14.
39.
HoffmanJ (2013) Theorizing power in transition studies: the role of creativity and novel practices in structural change. Policy Sciences46(3): 257–275.
40.
HoskinsAO’LoughlinB (2010) War and Media: The Emergence of Diffused War. Cambridge: Polity Press.
41.
House of Commons Home Affairs Committee report on the ‘tipping point’ of radicalization (2016) HC135, 25 August. London: UK House of Commons Home Affairs Committee.
KlausenJ (2015) Tweeting the Jihad : social media networks of western foreign fighters in Syria and Iraq. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism38(1): 1–22.
47.
KlausenJLibrettiRHungBWK, et al. (2018) Radicalization trajectories: an evidence-based computational approach to dynamic risk assessment of “homegrown” jihadists. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism43: 588–615.
48.
KlonickK (2018) The new governors: the people, rules, and processes governing online speech. Harvard Law Review131: 1598–1670.
49.
KrasnerSD (1982) Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables. International Organization36(2): 185–205.
50.
MalhotraNMoninBTomzM (2019) Does private regulation preempt public regulation?American Political Science Review113(1): 19–37.
MusianiFCogburnDLDeNardisL, et al. (2016) The Turn to Infrastructure in Internet Governance. London; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
53.
NacosB (2016) Mass-mediated Terrorism: Mainstream and Digital Media in Terrorism and Counterterrorism. 3rd ed.Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
54.
NeumannPR (2013) Options and strategies for countering online radicalization in the United States. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism36(6): 431–459.
55.
RitzmannA (2017) The role of propaganda in violent extremism and how to counter It. In: RitzmannA (ed.) Violent Extremism in the Euro-Mediterranean Region. EuroMed Survey of Experts and Actors 8. Barcelona: Institut Europeu de la Mediterrania (IEMed), pp. 26–32.
56.
RobertsST (2019) Behind the Screen: Content Moderation in the Shadows of Social Media. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
57.
SchmidA (2013) Radicalisation, de-radicalisation, counter-radicalisation: a conceptual discussion and literature review. The International Centre for Counter—terrorism—The Hague4: 165.
TréguerF (2019) Seeing like Big Tech: security assemblages, technology, and the future of state bureaucracy. In: BigoDIsinERuppertE (eds) Data Politics: Worlds, Subjects, Rights. Routledge Studies in International Political Sociology. London: Routledge, pp. 36–48.
