Loot boxes (LBs) are video game-related purchases with a chance-based outcome. Due to similarities with gambling, they have come under increasing scrutiny from media, academics and policymakers alike. Initial evidence suggested that LB engagement might be associated with both problem gambling (PG) and problem video gaming (PVG). We therefore conducted a systematic review of the evidence for associations between LB purchasing, PG and PVG. For LB/PG, 12 of 13 publications reported a positive relationship, with a moderately sized mean effect of r = .27. For LB/PVG, the mean effect was r = .40, although this finding was drawn from only six surveys in total. For PG/PVG, the mean effect was r = .21, with only 11 of 20 studies reporting significant effects. While further evidence is required to determine the direction of causality, the strength of relationships suggests that policy action on LBs may have benefits for harm minimisation.
AarsethEBeanAMBoonenH, et al. (2017) Scholars’ open debate paper on the World Health Organization ICD-11 Gaming Disorder proposal. Journal of Behavioral Addictions6(3): 267–270.
3.
AbarbanelBMaceyJ (2019) VGO, NFT, OMG! Commentary on continued developments in skins wagering. Gaming Law Review23(1): 23–25.
American Psychiatric Association (APA) (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®). Washington, DC: APA.
6.
BiegunJEdgertonJDRobertsLW (2020) Measuring problem online video gaming and its association with problem gambling and suspected motivational, mental health, and behavioral risk factors in a sample of university students. Games and Culture16: 434–456.
7.
BradyAPrenticeG (2021) Are loot boxes addictive? Analyzing participant’s physiological arousal while opening a loot box. Games and Culture16: 419–433.
8.
BromanNHåkanssonA (2018) Problematic gaming and internet use but not gambling may be overrepresented in sexual minorities – a pilot population web survey study. Frontiers in Psychology9: 2184.
9.
BrooksGAClarkL (2019) Associations between loot box use, problematic gaming and gambling, and gambling-related cognitions. Addictive Behaviors96: 26–34.
10.
CaladoFAlexandreJGriffithsMD (2017) Prevalence of adolescent problem gambling: a systematic review of recent research. Journal of Gambling Studies33(2): 397–424.
11.
CosenzaMCiccarelliMNigroG (2019) The steamy mirror of adolescent gamblers: mentalization, impulsivity, and time horizon. Addictive Behaviors89: 156–162.
12.
DelfabbroPKingDLambosC, et al. (2009) Is video-game playing a risk factor for pathological gambling in Australian adolescents?Journal of Gambling Studies25(3): 391–405.
13.
DerevenskyJLGriffithsMD (2019) Convergence between gambling and gaming: does the gambling and gaming industry have a responsibility in protecting the consumer?Gaming Law Review23(9): 633–639.
14.
DerevenskyJLGuptaRDella CioppaG (1996) A developmental perspective of gambling behavior in children and adolescents. Journal of Gambling Studies12(1): 49–66.
DrummondASauerJD (2018) Video game loot boxes are psychologically akin to gambling. Nature Human Behaviour2(8): 530–532.
17.
DrummondASauerJDHallLC (2019) Loot box limit-setting: a potential policy to protect video game users with gambling problems?Addiction114(5): 935–936.
18.
DrummondASauerJDFergusonCJ, et al. (2020a) The relationship between problem gambling, excessive gaming, psychological distress and spending on loot boxes in Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, and the United States – a cross-national survey. PLoS One15(3): e0230378.
19.
DrummondASauerJDHallLC, et al. (2020b) Why loot boxes could be regulated as gambling. Nature Human Behaviour4: 986–988.
FeigelmanWKleinmanPHLesieurHR, et al. (1995) Pathological gambling among methadone patients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence39(2): 75–81.
22.
FergusonCJ (2009) An effect size primer: a guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice40(5): 532–538.
23.
FieldAPGillettR (2010) How to do a meta-analysis. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology63(3): 665–694.
24.
FisherS (1993) Gambling and pathological gambling in adolescents. Journal of Gambling Studies9(3): 277–288.
25.
FordMHåkanssonA (2020) Problem gambling, associations with comorbid health conditions, substance use, and behavioural addictions: opportunities for pathways to treatment. PLoS One15(1): e0227644.
26.
ForrestCJKingDLDelfabbroPH (2016) The gambling preferences and behaviors of a community sample of Australian regular video game players. Journal of Gambling Studies32(2): 409–420.
FuWYuCKC (2015) Predicting disordered gambling with illusory control, gaming preferences, and internet gaming addiction among Chinese youth. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction13(3): 391–401.
29.
GainsburySM (2019) Gaming-gambling convergence: research, regulation, and reactions. Gaming Law Review23(2): 80–83.
30.
GainsburySMRussellAMTKingDL, et al. (2016) Migration from social casino games to gambling: motivations and characteristics of gamers who gamble. Computers in Human Behavior63: 59–67.
31.
Gambling Commission (2018) Young People and Gambling 2018 A Research Study among 11-16 Year Olds in Great Britain. Birmingham: Gambling Commission.
32.
GilpinAR (1993) Table for conversion of Kendall’s Tau to Spearman’s Rho within the context of measures of magnitude of effect for meta-analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement53(1): 87–92.
33.
GriffithsM (1999) Gambling technologies: prospects for problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies15(3): 265–283.
34.
GuptaRDerevenskyJL (1996) The relationship between gambling and video-game playing behavior in children and adolescents. Journal of Gambling Studies12(4): 375–394.
35.
HåkanssonAKenttäGÅkesdotterC (2018) Problem gambling and gaming in elite athletes. Addictive Behaviors Reports8: 79–84.
HongQNFàbreguesSBartlettG, et al. (2018) The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information34(4): 285–291.
Jiménez-MurciaSFernández-ArandaFGraneroR, et al. (2014) Video game addiction in gambling disorder: clinical, psychopathological, and personality correlates. Biomed Research International2014: 315062.
KandelDB (ed.) (2002) Stages and Pathways of Drug Involvement: Examining the Gateway Hypothesis. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
KanekoYYadaKIharaW, et al. (2018) How game users consume virtual currency: the relationship between consumed quantity, inventory, and elapsed time since last consumption in the mobile game world. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on data mining workshops (ICDMW’2018), Singapore, 17–20 November, pp. 848–855. New York: IEEE.
46.
KarlssonJBromanNHåkanssonA (2019) Associations between problematic gambling, gaming, and internet use: a cross-sectional population survey. Journal of Addiction2019: 1464858.
47.
KimHSWohlMJASalmonMM, et al. (2015) Do social casino gamers migrate to online gambling? An assessment of migration rate and potential predictors. Journal of Gambling Studies31(4): 1819–1831.
48.
KingDLDelfabbroPH (2018) Predatory monetization schemes in video games (e.g. ’loot boxes’) and internet gaming disorder. Addiction113(11): 1967–1969.
49.
KingDLDelfabbroPHGainsburySM, et al. (2019) Unfair play? Video games as exploitative monetized services: an examination of game patents from a consumer protection perspective. Computers in Human Behavior101: 131–143.
50.
KingDLEjovaADelfabbroPH (2012) Illusory control, gambling, and video gaming: an investigation of regular gamblers and video game players. Journal of Gambling Studies28(3): 421–435.
51.
KingDLGainsburySMDelfabbroPH, et al. (2015) Distinguishing between gaming and gambling activities in addiction research. Journal of Behavioral Addictions4(4): 215–220.
52.
KingDLRussellAMTDelfabbroPH, et al. (2020) Fortnite microtransaction spending was associated with peers’ purchasing behaviors but not gaming disorder symptoms. Addictive Behaviors104: 106311.
53.
KoederMJTanakaEMitomoH (2018) ‘Lootboxes’ in digital games – a gamble with consumers in need of regulation? An evaluation based on learnings from Japan. In: Proceedings of the 22nd biennial conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): ‘beyond the boundaries: challenges for business, policy and society’, Seoul, South Korea, 24–27 June.
54.
KristiansenSSeverinMC (2019) Exploring groups of simulated gambling behaviour: a typological study among Danish adolescents. International Gambling Studies20: 135–150.
55.
KristiansenSSeverinMC (2020) Loot box engagement and problem gambling among adolescent gamers: findings from a national survey. Addictive Behaviors103: 106254.
56.
KussDJGriffithsMDPontesHM (2017) DSM-5 diagnosis of Internet Gaming Disorder: some ways forward in overcoming issues and concerns in the gaming studies field: response to the commentaries. Journal of Behavioral Addictions6(2): 133–141.
57.
LadouceurRDubéD (1995) Prevalence of pathological gambling and associated problems in individuals who visit non-gambling video arcades. Journal of Gambling Studies11(4): 361–365.
58.
LainRBrownF (1989) Gaming, gambling, risk taking, addictions and a developmental model of a pathology of man-machine relationships. In: KlabbersJHGScheperWJTakkenbergCA, et al. (eds) Simulation-Gaming. Amsterdam: Elsevier, p. 368.
59.
LarcheCJChiniKLeeC, et al. (2019) Rare loot box rewards trigger larger arousal and reward responses, and greater urge to open more loot boxes. Journal of Gambling Studies37: 141–163.
McBrideJDerevenskyJL (2016) Gambling and video game playing among youth. Journal of Gambling Issues34: 156–178.
64.
McCaffreyM (2019) The macro problem of microtransactions: the self-regulatory challenges of video game loot boxes. Business Horizons62(4): 483–495.
65.
MaceyJHamariJ (2018) Investigating relationships between video gaming, spectating esports, and gambling. Computers in Human Behavior80: 344–353.
66.
MaceyJHamariJ (2019a) eSports, skins and loot boxes: participants, practices and problematic behaviour associated with emergent forms of gambling. New Media & Society21(1): 20–41.
67.
MaceyJHamariJ (2019b) The games we play: relationships between game genre, business model and loot box opening. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international GamiFIN conference (GamiFIN’2019), Levi, 8–10 April.
68.
MillsDJMarchicaLKeoughMT, et al. (2020) Exploring differences in substance use among emerging adults at-risk for problem gambling, and/or problem video gaming. International Gambling Studies20: 539–555.
69.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al. (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ339: b2535.
70.
MoldeHHolmøyBMerkesdalAG, et al. (2019) Are video games a gateway to gambling? a longitudinal study based on a representative Norwegian sample. Journal of Gambling Studies35(2): 545–557.
71.
Office of the Children’s Commissioner (2019) Gaming the System. London: Office of the Children’s Commissioner.
RayluNOeiTPS (2004) The Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS): development, confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties. Addiction99(6): 757–769.
74.
Royal Society for Public Health (2019) Skins in the Game: A High-Stakes Relationship Between Gambling and Young People’s Health and Wellbeing?London: Royal Society for Public Health.
75.
ScholtenOJHughesNGJDeterdingS, et al. (2019) Ethereum crypto-games: mechanics, prevalence, and gambling similarities. In: Proceedings of the annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play, Barcelona, 22 October, pp. 379–389. New York: ACM.
76.
SeoYJungYSngJ, et al. (2019) Rational or irrational decision? Examination on gamers’ intention to purchase probability-type items. Interacting with Computers31: 603–641.
77.
ShibuyaATeramotoMShounA, et al. (2019) Long-term effects of in-game purchases and event game mechanics on young mobile social game players in Japan. Simulation & Gaming50(1): 76–92.
78.
SplevinsKMireskandariSClaytonK, et al. (2010) Prevalence of adolescent problem gambling, related harms and help-seeking behaviours among an Australian population. Journal of Gambling Studies26(2): 189–204.
79.
VadlinSÅslundCNilssonKW (2018) A longitudinal study of the individual- and group-level problematic gaming and associations with problem gambling among Swedish adolescents. Brain and Behavior8(4): e00949.
80.
Von MedunaMSteinmetzFAnteL, et al. (2019) Loot boxes – a game changer? Work paper series no. 2, March 2019, pp. 1–14. Hamburg: Gambling Research Division, Universität Hamburg.
81.
Von MedunaMSteinmetzFAnteL, et al. (2020) Loot boxes are gambling-like elements in video games with harmful potential: results from a large-scale population survey. Technology in Society63: 101395.
82.
WaltherBMorgensternMHanewinkelR (2012) Co-occurrence of addictive behaviours: personality factors related to substance use, gambling and computer gaming. European Addiction Research18(4): 167–174.
83.
WardleHZendleD (2021) Loot boxes, gambling, and problem gambling among young people: results from a cross-sectional online survey. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking24: 267–274.
84.
WelteJWWieczorekWFBarnesGM, et al. (2006) Multiple risk factors for frequent and problem gambling: individual, social, and ecological. Journal of Applied Social Psychology36(6): 1548–1568.
85.
WoodRTAGuptaRDerevenskyJL, et al. (2004) Video game playing and gambling in adolescents: common risk factors. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse14(1): 77–100.
86.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2018) International classification of diseases for mortality and morbidity statistics (ICD-11 MMS, 11th revision). Available at: https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en (accessed 27 November 2020).
87.
ZendleD (2019a) Gambling-like video game practices: links with problem gambling and disordered gaming in a nationally representative sample. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fh3vx
88.
ZendleD (2019b) Problem gamblers spend less money when loot boxes are removed from a game: a before and after study of Heroes of the Storm. PeerJ7: e7700.
89.
ZendleDCairnsP (2018) Video game loot boxes are linked to problem gambling: results of a large-scale survey. PLoS One13(11): e0206767.
90.
ZendleDCairnsP (2019) Loot boxes are again linked to problem gambling: results of a replication study. PLoS One14(3): e0213194.
91.
ZendleDCairnsPBarnettH, et al. (2020a) Paying for loot boxes is linked to problem gambling, regardless of specific features like cash-out and pay-to-win. Computers in Human Behavior102: 181–191.
92.
ZendleDMeyerROverH (2019a) Adolescents and loot boxes: links with problem gambling and motivations for purchase. Royal Society Open Science6(6): 190049.
93.
ZendleDMeyerRCairnsP, et al. (2020b) The prevalence of loot boxes in mobile and desktop games. Addiction115: 1768–1772.
94.
ZendleDMeyerRWatersS, et al. (2019b) The prevalence of loot boxes means that content descriptors are just as important as limit setting when it comes to minimising potential harm: a reply to Drummond et al. Unpublished working paper. Available at: https://psyarxiv.com/pnq6x/
95.
ZendleDWalasekLCairnsP, et al. (2021) Links between problem gambling and spending on booster packs in collectible card games: a conceptual replication of research on loot boxes. PLoS One16: e0247855.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
