Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article explores an inflection point for a community of cryptography advocates as they grappled with a series of cascading failures. Drawing on 3 years of ethnographic observation and interviews at conferences devoted to building privacy systems, I consider how a determinist conception of encryption technologies inhibited the widespread adoption of privacy technologies. I develop the frame of “survival of the cryptic” to call attention to the way this conception fails to acknowledge how power shapes the conditions of surveillance: that race and racism, gender and misogyny affect not only who is most impacted by surveillance but also how the encryption technologies developed to inhibit surveillance were designed—and, as importantly, who they were designed for. I conclude by offering a new imaginary for encryption that draws on queer, black and feminist thought by centering the need to create safe and autonomous spaces for collective survival under conditions of mass surveillance.

Keywords

Cypherpunk encryption privacy surveillance technodeterminism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agre

(1997) Computation and Human Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ananny

(2015) From noxious to public? Tracing ethical dynamics of social media platform conversions. Social Media + Society 1(1): 1–3.

Ananny

(2016) Toward an ethics of algorithms: convening, observation, probability and timeliness. Science, Technology, and Human Values 41(1): 93–117.

Angwin

(2014) Dragnet Nation: A Quest for Privacy, Security and Freedom in a World of Relentless Surveillance. New York: Times Books.

Angwin

Larson

Mattu

, et al. (2016) Machine bias. ProPublica. Available at: https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing

Assange

(2012) Cypherpunks: Freedom and the Future of the Internet. New York: OR Books.

Barbrook

Cameron

(1995) The Californian ideology. Mute Magazine 1(3). Available at: https://www.metamute.org/editorial/articles/californian-ideology

Barzilai-Nahon

(2008) Toward a theory of network gatekeeping: a framework exploring information control. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(9): 1492–1512.

Beltramini

(2020) Against technocratic authoritarianism: a short intellectual history of the cypherpunk movement. Internet Histories. Epub ahead of print 2 March. DOI: 10.1080/24701475.2020.1731249.

10.

Benkler

(2006) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

11.

Benkler

(2011) Networks of power, degrees of freedom. International Journal of Communication 5: 721–755.

12.

boyd

(2010) Social network sites as networked publics: affordances, dynamics, and implications. In: Papacharissi

(ed.) Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 39–58.

13.

Browne

(2015) Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Durham, NC: Duke University.

14.

Brunton

(2019) Digital Cash: A Cultural History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

15.

Brunton

Nissenbaum

(2011) Vernacular resistance to data collection and analysis: a political theory of obfuscation. First Monday. Epub ahead of print 2 May. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v16i5.3493.

16.

Burrell

(2009) The field site as a network: a strategy for locating ethnographic research. Field Methods 21(2): 181–199.

17.

Card

(1990) The hypocrites of homosexuality. Available at: http://www.nauvoo.com/library/card-hypocrites.html

18.

Castells

(1996) The Rise of the Network Society. New York: John Wiley.

19.

Clark

Goodspeed

Metzger

, et al. (2011) Why (special agent) Johnny (still) can’t encrypt: a security analysis of the APCO project 25 two-way radio system. USENIX Security Symposium 2011: 8–12.

20.

Coleman

Golub

(2008) Hacker practice: moral genres and the cultural articulation of liberalism. Anthropological Theory 8(3): 255–277.

21.

Deibert

(2013) Black Code: Inside the Battle for Cyberspace. Toronto, ON, Canada: McClelland & Stewart.

22.

Dunbar-Hester

(2019) Hacking Diversity: The Politics of Inclusion in Open Technology Communities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

23.

Eubanks

(2017) Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

24.

Evans

(2017) WhatsApp, signal, and dangerously ignorant journalism. Techcrunch. Available at: https://techcrunch.com/2017/01/22/whatsapp-signal-and-dangerously-ignorant-journalism/

25.

Franceschi-Bicchierai

(2015) Even the inventor of PGP doesn’t use PGP. Motherboard. Available at: https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/vvbw9a/even-the-inventor-of-pgp-doesnt-use-pgp

26.

Franceschi-Bicchierai

(2017) Cryptocurrencies aren’t “crypto.” Motherboard. Available at: https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/43nk9b/cryptocurrency-are-not-crypto-bitcoin

27.

Garfinkel

(1995) PGP: Pretty Good Privacy. Beijing, China: O’Reilly & Associates, Inc.

28.

Gonggrijp

Rieger

(2005) We lost the war. 22C3. Available at: https://media.ccc.de/v/22C3-920-en-we_lost_the_war

29.

Gurses

Kundnani

Van Hoboken

(2016) Crypto and empire: the contradictions of counter-surveillance advocacy. Media, Culture & Society 38(4): 576–590.

30.

Hellegren

(2017) A history of crypto-discourse: encryption as a site of struggles to define internet freedom. Internet Histories 1(4): 285–311.

31.

Hellmann

Diffie

(1976) New directions in cryptography. IEEE Transactions in Information Theory 22(6): 644–654.

32.

Joh

(2016) Beyond surveillance: data control and body cameras. Surveillance & Society 14(1): 133–137.

33.

Kelly

(1993) Cypherpunks, e-money and the technologies of disconnection. Whole Earth Review 79: 40.

34.

Kreiss

McGregor

(2017) Technology firms shape political communication: the work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google with campaigns during the 2016 U.S. presidential cycle. Political Communication 35(2): 155–177.

35.

Ludlow

(ed.) (2001) Crypto Anarchy, Cyberstates, and Pirate Utopias. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

36.

Mackinnon

(1989) Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

37.

Mann

Ferenbok

(2013) New media and the power politics of sousveillance in a surveillance-dominated world. Surveillance & Society 11(1/2): 18–34.

38.

Marcus

(1995) Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95–117.

39.

Marvin

(1988) When Old Technologies Were New. New York: Oxford University Press.

40.

Marwick

boyd

(2014) Networked privacy: how teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society 16(7): 1051–1067.

41.

May

(2004) Commie rag praises MLK. Narkive. Available at: https://scruz.general.narkive.com/29QgNUds/commie-rag-praises-mlk

42.

May

(1992) The crypto anarchist manifesto. Available at: https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/crypto/cypherpunks/may-crypto-manifesto.html

43.

McChesney

(2001) Global media, neoliberalism, and imperialism. Monthly Review. Available at: https://monthlyreview.org/2001/03/01/global-media-neoliberalism-and-imperialism/

44.

McGlotten

(2014) Black data. S&F Online. Available at: https://sfonline.barnard.edu/traversing-technologies/shaka-mcglotten-black-data/

45.

McKelvey

(2014) Algorithmic media need democratic methods: why publics matter. Canadian Journal of Communication 39(4): 597–614.

46.

Narayanan

(2013) What happened to the crypto dream? Parts 1 and 2. IEEE Computer and Reliability Societies 11(2): 75–76.

47.

Nissenbaum

(2010) Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law Books.

48.

Noble

(2018) Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.

49.

Oldenziel

(1999) Making Technology Masculine: Men, Women, and Modern Machines in America, 1870-1945. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

50.

Pasquale

(2016) The Black Box Society: The Secret algorithms That Control Money and Information. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

51.

Rogaway

(2015) The moral character of cryptographic work, IACR distinguished lecture, AsiaCrypt. Available at: https://web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~rogaway/papers/moral-fn.pdf

52.

Ruoti

Kim

Burgon

, et al. (2013) Confused Johnny: when automatic encryption leads to confusion and mistakes. In: Proceedings of the ninth symposium on usable privacy and security, pp. 1–12. Available at: https://cups.cs.cmu.edu/soups/2013/proceedings/a5_Ruoti.pdf

53.

Schiller

(1996) Theorizing Communication: A History. New York: Oxford University Press

54.

Schneier

(2015) Data and Goliath: the Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.

55.

Schulte

(2013) Cached: Decoding the Internet in Global Popular Culture. New York: New York University Press.

56.

Scott

(1988) Gender and the Politics of History. New York: Columbia University Press.

57.

Sheng

Broderick

Koranda

, et al. (2006) Why Johnny still can’t encrypt: evaluating the usability of email encryption software. In: Symposium on usable privacy and security, pp. 3–4. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283334711_Why_Johnny_Still_Still_Can’t_Encrypt_Evaluating_the_Usability_of_a_Modern_PGP_Client

58.

Squires

(2006) Rethinking the black public sphere: an alternative vocabulary for multiple public spheres. Communication Theory 12(4): 446–468.

59.

Streeter

(2011) The Net Effect: Romanticism, Capitalism, and the Internet. New York: New York University Press.

60.

Swartz

(2018) What was Bitcoin, what will it be? The techno-economic imaginaries of a new money technology. Cultural Studies 32(4): 623–650.

61.

Tong

Gold

Gichohi

, et al. (2014) Why King George III can encrypt. Freedom to Tinker. Available at: https://www.cs.princeton.edu/~arvindn/teaching/spring-2014-privacy-technologies/king-george-iii-encrypt.pdf

62.

Tufekci

(2015) Algorithmic harms beyond Facebook and Google: emergent challenges of computational agency. Colorado Technology Journal 13(2): 203–216.

63.

Turner

(2006) From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

64.

Van Dijck

(2013) The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

65.

Vinge

(2001) True Names and the Opening of the Cyberspace Frontier. New York: Tor Books.

66.

Warner

(2002) Publics and Counterpublics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

67.

West

(2018) Cryptographic imaginaries and the networked public. Internet Policy Review 7(2).

68.

Whitten

Tygar

(1999) Why Johnny can’t encrypt: a usability evaluation of PGP 5.0. USENIX Security Symposium 348: 169–184.

69.

Woolgar

(1991) Configuring the user: the case of usability trials. The Sociological Review 38(s1): 58–99.

70.

Zuboff

(2015) Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology 30: 75–89.

Survival of the cryptic: Tracing technological imaginaries across ideologies,infrastructures,and community practices

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References