Ingestible sensors,data,and pharmaceuticals: Subjectivity in the era of digital mental health

Abstract

This article examines a notable innovation of digital mental health: Abilify MyCite, approved by the United States’ Food and Drug Administration in 2017. This antipsychotic is equipped with an ingestible sensor which communicates with a wearable patch, smartphone app, and online portal. The article approaches Abilify MyCite as an assemblage of technologies: trackers, sensors, patches, apps, programming, smartphones, and the Internet. Drawing on science and technology studies and new materialism, it examines the production of subjectivity in the era of digital mental health. Through this case study, the article offers a theoretical framework for understanding how subjectivity and knowledge of mental health and illness are transformed through the combination of technology and pharmaceuticals, and the entanglement of human and non-human actors. I propose viewing mental health and illness in times of digital mental health as technological world-making, where sensors, objects, knowledge, and subjectivity emerge together in more-than-human worlds.

Keywords

Abilify MyCite care data digital media mental health new materialism pharmaceuticals science and technology studies subjectivity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbasi

(2018) HIV preexposure prophylaxis “smart pill” in early testing. Journal of the American Medical Association 320(10): 965.

Adams

Huys

QJM

Roiser

(2015) Computational psychiatry: towards a mathematically informed understanding of mental illness. Neuropsychiatry 87: 53–63.

Anxiety

(2018) Live chat. Available at: https://www.anxietyuk.org.uk/get-help/anxiety-uk-national-infoline-service/live-chat/ (accessed 15 August 2019)

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2018) Household use of information technology, Australia, 2016-17. Available at: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/8146.0 (accessed 2 September 2019).

Australian Government (2012) E-Mental health strategy for Australia. Report. Department of Health and Ageing. Available at: https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/7C7B0BFEB985D0EBCA257BF0001BB0A6/$File/emstrat.pdf

Barad

(2003) Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28(3): 801–831.

Barad

(2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Batra

Baker

Wang

, et al. (2017) Digital health technology for use in patients with serious mental illness: a systematic review of the literature. Medical Devices: Evidence and Research 10: 237–251.

Bauchspies

Puig de la Bellacasa

(2009) Re-tooling subjectivities: exploring the possible with feminist science and technology studies. Subjectivity 28(1): 227–228.

10.

Bennett

(2009) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Matter. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

11.

Berry

(2017) #WhyWeTweetMH: understanding why people use Twitter to discuss mental health problems. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19(4): e107.

12.

Blackman

Cromby

Hook

, et al. (2008) Creating subjectivities. Subjectivity 22(1): 1–27.

13.

Brophy

Kokanovic

Flore

, et al. (2019) Community treatment orders and supported decision-making. Frontiers in Psychiatry 10: 414.

14.

Byron

(2019) ‘Apps are cool but generally pretty pointless’: LGBTIQ+ young people’s mental health app ambivalence. Media International Australia 171(1): 51–65.

15.

Callard

(2014) Psychiatric diagnosis: the indispensability of ambivalence. Journal of Medical Ethics 40: 526–530.

16.

Comstock

(2017) In-depth: how digital sensors could change the face of pharma. Available at: https://www.mobihealthnews.com/content/depth-how-digital-sensors-could-change-face-pharma (accessed 1 September 2019).

17.

Condliffe

(2017) The FDA has approved smart pills that track when patients take their meds. MIT Technology Review. Available at: https://www.technologyreview.com/f/609476/the-fda-has-approved-smart-pills-that-track-when-patients-take-their-meds/ (accessed 2 July 2019)

18.

De Landa

(2002) Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury.

19.

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2017a) FDA approves pill with sensor that digitally tracks if patients have ingested their medication. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-pill-sensor-digitally-tracks-if-patients-have-ingested-their-medication (accessed 17 September 2019).

20.

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2017b) Highlights of prescribing information. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/207202lbl.pdf (accessed 20 September 2019).

21.

Firth

Torous

(2015) Smartphone apps for schizophrenia: a systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 3(4): e102.

22.

Fiske

Henningsen

Buyx

, et al. (2019) Your robot therapist will see you now: ethical implications of embodied artificial intelligence in psychiatry, psychology, and psychotherapy. Journal of Medical Internet Research 21(5): e13216.

23.

Fitzgerald

Callard

(2018) Experimental entanglements: social science and neuroscience beyond interdisciplinarity. In: Maurizio

Cromby

Fitzgerald

, et al. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Biology and Society. London: Palgrave, pp. 441–472.

24.

Flore

Kokanovic

Callard

, et al. (2019) Unravelling subjectivity, embodied experience and (taking) psychotropic medication. Social Science & Medicine 230: 66–73.

25.

Fox

(2015) Personal health technologies, micropolitics and resistance: a new materialist analysis. Health 21(2): 136–153.

26.

Fox

Alldred

(2017) Sociology and the New Materialism: Theory, Research, Action. London: SAGE.

27.

Fullagar

Rich

Francombe-Webb

(2017b) New kinds of (ab)normal? Public pedagogies, affect, and youth mental health in the digital age. Social Sciences 6(4): 99–111.

28.

Fullagar

Rich

Francombe-Webb

, et al. (2017a) Digital ecologies of youth mental health: apps, therapeutic publics and pedagogy as affective arrangements. Social Sciences 6(4): 135–149.

29.

Gonzalez-Polledo

Tarr

(2014) The thing about pain: the remaking of illness narratives in chronic pain expressions on social media. New Media & Society 18(8): 1455–1472.

30.

Gooding

(2019) Mapping the rise of digital mental health technologies: emerging issues for law and society. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 67: 101498.

31.

Hackett

Amsterdamska

Lynch

, et al. (eds) (2008) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

32.

Haraway

(1991) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.

33.

Hatch

(2018) Digital mental health drug raises troubling questions. Available at: https://theconversation.com/digital-mental-health-drug-raises-troubling-questions-97510 (accessed 5 September 2019).

34.

Hjorth

Lim

(2012) Mobile intimacy in an age of affective mobile media. Feminist Media Studies 12(4): 477–484.

35.

Kettle

Mellor

Silva-Myles

, et al. (2018) Sexting and mental health: a study of Indian and Australian young adults. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 12(2): 2.

36.

Latour

(2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

37.

Lear

(2019) Abilify MyCite: the ethnically hard pill to swallow. Berkeley Science Review. Available at: https://berkeleysciencereview.com/2019/05/abilify-mycite/ (accessed 26 May 2019)

38.

Lupton

(2015) Donna Haraway: The digital cyborg and assemblage and the new digital technologies. In: Collyer

(ed) The Palgrave Handbook of Social Theory in Health, Illness and Medicine. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 567–581.

39.

Lupton

(2017) Digital Health: Critical and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. London: Routledge.

40.

Lupton

(2019) The thing-power of the human-app health assemblage: thinking with vital materialism. Social Theory & Health 17: 125–139.

41.

McCosker

(2018) Engaging mental health online: insights from Beyondblue’s Forum Influencers. New Media & Society 20(12): 4748–4764.

42.

Mager

(2009) Mediated health: sociotechnical practices of providing and using health information. New Media & Society 11(7): 1123–1142.

43.

Martin

Myers

Viseu

(2015) The politics of care in technoscience. Social Studies of Science 45(5): 625–641.

44.

Morrison

Meehan

Stomski

(2015) Living with antipsychotics side-effects: the experience of Australian mental health consumers. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 24(3): 253–261.

45.

Mucic

(2017) From telepsychiatry to e—mental health—experiences and prospects in Europe. European Psychiatry 41: S42.

46.

NHS Confederation Mental Health Network (2013) E-Mental Health: What’s All the Fuss About? London: The NHS Confederation. Available at: http://www.nhsconfed.org/∼/media/Confederation/Files/Publications/Documents/E-mental-health.pdf

47.

O’Riordan

(2011) Revisiting digital technologies: envisioning biodigital bodies. Communications 36: 291–312.

48.

Otsuka America Pharmaceutical (2019) Abilify MyCite. Available at: https://www.abilifymycite.com/instructions-for-use (accessed 2 October 2019).

49.

Otsuka Pharmaceuticals (2017) Otsuka and Proteus digital health resubmit application to FDA for first digital medicine. Available at: https://www.otsuka-us.com/discover/articles-1033 (accessed 12 September 2019)

50.

Oudshoorn

(2011) How places matter: telecare technologies and the changing spatial dimensions of telecare. Social Studies of Science 42(1): 121–142.

51.

Patel

Shortliffe

Stefanelli

, et al. (2009) The coming of age of artificial intelligence in medicine. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 46(1): 5–17.

52.

Pedersen

Iliadis

(eds) (2020) Embodied Computing: Wearables, Implantables, Embeddables, Ingestibles. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

53.

Petersen

Tanner

Munsie

(2019) Citizens’ use of digital media to connect with health care: socio-ethical and regulatory implications. Health 23(4): 367–384.

54.

Pilgrim

Rogers

Gabe

(2011) Social aspects of psychotropic medication. In: Pilgrim

Rogers

Pescosolido

(eds) The SAGE Handbook of Mental Health and Illness. London: SAGE, pp. 367–388.

55.

Pitts-Taylor

(2016) The Brain’s Body: Neuroscience and Corporeal Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

56.

Puig de la Bellacasa

(2017) Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

57.

Rich

Miah

(2017) Mobile, wearable and ingestible health technologies: toward a critical research agenda. Health Sociology Review 26(1): 84–97.

58.

Rich

Miah

Lewis

(2019) Is digital health care more equitable? The framing of health inequalities within England’s digital health policy 2010-2017. Sociology of Health & Illness 41(S1): 31–49.

59.

Riper

Andersson

Christensen

, et al. (2010) Editorial. Theme issue on e-mental health: a growing field in internet research. Journal of Medical Internet Research 12(5): e74.

60.

Rose

(1998) Governing risky individuals: the role of psychiatry in new regimes of control. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 5(2): 177–195.

61.

Rubin

(2015) Generic Abilify gets FDA approval. Journal of the American Medical Association 313(21): 2115.

62.

Russo

(2018) Through the eyes of the observed: re-directing research on psychiatric drugs. Talking Point Papers No. 3. London: McPin Foundation. Available at: https://mcpin.org/wp-content/uploads/talking-point-paper-3-final.pdf (accessed 3 July 2019).

63.

Seaver

(2017) Algorithms as culture: some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems. Big Data & Society 4(2): 1–12.

64.

Seko

Lewis

(2016) The self-harmed, visualized, and reblogged: remaking of self-injury narratives on Tumblr. New Media & Society 20(1): 180–198.

65.

Singh

Rose

(2009) Biomarkers in psychiatry. Nature 460(7252): 202–207.

66.

Stage

(2017) Networked Cancer: Affect, Narrative and Measurement. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

67.

Steinkamp

Goldblatt

Borodovsky

, et al. (2019) Technological interventions for medication adherence in adult mental health and substance use disorders: a systematic review. JMIR Mental Health 6(3): e12493.

68.

Swartz

(2018) Smart pills for psychosis: the tricky ethical challenges of digital medicine for serious mental illness. The American Journal of Bioethics 18(9): 65–67.

69.

Torous

Keshavan

(2018) A new window into psychosis: the rise of digital phenotyping, smartphone assessment and mobile monitoring. Schizophrenia Research 197: 67–68.

70.

Trivelli

(2014) Depression, performativity and the conflicted body: an auto-ethnography of self-medication. Subjectivity 7(2): 151–170.

71.

Tucker

Goodings

(2016) Medicated bodies: mental distress, social media and affect. New Media & Society 20(2): 549–563.

72.

Vertesi

Ribes

(2019) Introduction. In: Vertesi

Ribes

(eds) Digitalsts: A Field Guide for Science and Technology Studies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 1–10.

73.

Wilson

(2015) Gut Feminism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.