Through a values in design (VID) analysis, this article assesses two mood-tracking apps (Moodscope and MoodPanda) to argue the particular interface design choices of these applications serve to influence their users’ sense of sociality and self-fashioning. The design features of these artifacts signal a broader shift in the sociotechnical definitions and discourses of the feeling of an individual, enabling an emergent emotive politics at work across contemporary digital media technologies.
BarocasSSelbstAD (2016) Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Review104: 671–732.
6.
BellerJ (2006) The Cinematic Mode of Production: Attention Economy and the Society of the Spectacle. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England/Dartmouth College Press.
7.
BelliJ (2017) Unhappy? There’s an app for that. Digital Culture & Society2(1): 1–16.
8.
BerlantL (2011) Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
9.
BoehnerKBoehnerKDePaulaR, et al. (2005) Affect: from information to interaction. In: Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility, Aarhus, Denmark, 20–24 August, 2005. ACM 2005, ISBN 1-59593-203-8.
Cheney-LippoldJ (2017) We Are Data: Algorithms and the Making of Our Digital Selves. New York: New York University Press.
16.
CrawfordKSchultzJ (2013) Big Data and Due Process: Toward a Framework to Redress Predictive Privacy Harms. New York: New York University School of Law.
17.
DanzigerK (1990) Constructing the Subject: Historical Origins of Psychological Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DiakopoulosN (2016) Accountability in algorithmic decision making. Communications of the ACM59(2): 56–62.
20.
DourishP (2004) Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
21.
DourishP (2016) Algorithms and their others: algorithmic culture in context. Big Data & Society3(2): 1–11.
22.
DrakeGCsipkeEWykesT (2013) Assessing your mood online: acceptability and use of Moodscope. Psychological Medicine43(07): 1455–1464.
23.
DrorOE (2001) Counting the affects: discoursing in numbers. Social Research68(2): 357–378.
24.
DrorOE (2009) Afterword: a reflection on feelings and the history of science. Isis100(4): 848–851.
25.
DruckerJ (2014) Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
ElliotAJ (2015) Color and psychological functioning: a review of theoretical and empirical work. Frontiers in Psychology6: 1–8.
27.
FlanaganMNissenbaumH (2014) Values at Play in Digital Games. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
28.
FlanaganMHoweDCNissenbaumH (2008) Embodying values in technology: theory and practice. In: van den HoevenJWeckertJ (eds) Information Technology and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 322–353.
FriedmanBNissenbaumH (1996) Bias in computer systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems14(3): 330–347.
31.
FriedmanBKahnPHBorningA (2006) Value sensitive design and information systems. In: SchneidermanBZhangPGallettaD (eds) Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., pp. 348–372.
32.
GallowayAR (2006) Gaming: Essays on Algorithmic Culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
33.
GatesK (2011) Our Biometric Future: Facial Recognition Technology and the Culture of Surveillance. New York: New York University Press.
34.
GeogheganBD (2017) The family as machine: film, infrastructure, and cybernetic kinship in suburban America. Grey Room66(1): 70–101.
35.
GreeneDHoffmannALStarkL (2019) Better, nicer, clearer, fairer. In: BuiTXSpragueRH (eds) Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 2122–2131. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10125/59651
36.
IllouzE (2007) Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. London: Polity Press.
37.
InselTR (2017) Digital phenotyping: technology for a new science of behavior. Journal of American Medical Association318(13): 1215–1216.
38.
IsbisterKHöökK (2007) Evaluating affective interactions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies65(4): 273–274.
39.
IsbisterKHöökKLaaksolahtiJ, et al. (2007) The sensual evaluation instrument: developing a trans-cultural self-report measure of affect. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies65(4): 315–328.
40.
IsomursuMTähtiMVäinämöS, et al. (2007) Experimental evaluation of five methods for collecting emotions in field settings with mobile applications. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies65(4): 404–418.
41.
JainSHPowersBWHawkinsJB, et al. (2015) The digital phenotype. Nature Publishing Group, Nature Publishing Group33(5): 462–463.
42.
JohnsonDG (2018) AI, agency and responsibility: the VW fraud case and beyond. AI & Society34:639–647.
43.
KaganJ (2007) What Is Emotion?New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press.
44.
KerrIMcGillJ (2007) Emanations, snoop dogs and reasonable expectations of privacy. Criminal Law Quarterly52(3): 392–431.
45.
KimDFrankMGKimST (2014) Emotional display behavior in different forms of Computer Mediated Communication. Computers in Human Behavior30: 222–229.
KuuttiKBannonLJ (2014) The turn to practice in HCI. In: CHI ’14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, Canada, April 2014, pp. 3543–3552. New York: ACM Press.
48.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-network Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
LeahuLSchwenkSSengersP (2008) Subjective objectivity: negotiating emotional meaning. In: DIS '08: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, Cape Town, February 2008, pp. 425–434. New York: ACM.
50.
LemovR (2005) World as Laboratory: Experiments with Mazes, Mice, and Men. New York: Hill and Wang.
51.
McStayA (2016) Empathic media and advertising: industry, policy, legal and citizen perspectives (the case for intimacy). Big Data & Society 3(2): 2053951716666868.
52.
McStayA (2018) Emotional AI: The Rise of Empathic Media. London: SAGE.
53.
Manders-HuitsNZimmerM (2009) Values and pragmatic action: the challenges of introducing ethical intelligence in technical design communities. International Review of Information Ethics10: 37–45.
54.
MartinE (2007) Bipolar Expeditions. Princeton, NJ; Oxford: Princeton University Press.
55.
MartinE (2013) Imagining mood disorders as a public health crisis. In: CooterR (ed.) Imagining Illness: Public Health and Visual Culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 245–263.
NafusDShermanJ (2014) This one does not go up to 11: the quantified self movement as an alternative big data practice. International Journal of Communication8: 1784–1794.
60.
NakamuraL (2009) Interfaces of identity: oriental traitors and telematic profiling in 24. Camera Obscura: Feminism, Culture, and Media Studies24(170): 109–133.
61.
NgaiS (2005) Ugly Feelings. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
62.
NissenbaumH (2011) A contextual approach to privacy online. Daedalus140(4): 32–48.
63.
NormanDA (2005) Emotional Design: Why We Love (Or Hate) Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
64.
PapacharissiZ (2014) Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford; London: Oxford University Press.
65.
PicardRW (2000) Affective Computing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
66.
PritzSM (2016) Making emotions count: the self-tracking of feelings. In: SelkeS (ed.) Lifelogging. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, pp. 179–187.
RoseN (1988) Calculable minds and manageable individuals. History of the Human Sciences1(2): 179–200.
69.
RoseN (1996) Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70.
SchüllND (2015) The gaming of chance: online poker software and the potentialization of uncertainty. In: RabinowPSamimian-DarashL (eds) Modes of Uncertainty Anthropological Observations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 46–68.
71.
SchüllND (2016) Data for life: wearable technology and the design of self-care. BioSocieties11(3): 1–17.
72.
SchüllNDZaloomC (2011) The shortsighted brain: neuroeconomics and the governance of choice in time. Social Studies of Science41(4): 515–538.
73.
SchüllND (in press) Keeping Track. New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux.
74.
SengersPBoehnerKMateasM, et al. (2008) The disenchantment of affect. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing12(5): 347–358.
StarkL (2019) Affect and emotion in digitalSTS. In: VertesiJRibesD (eds) DigitalSTS: A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies. Princeton, NJ; Oxford: Princeton University Press, pp. 117–135.
SundströmPStåhlAHöökK (2007) In situ informants exploring an emotional mobile messaging system in their everyday practice. International Journal of Human-computer Studies65(4): 388–403.
