This article articulates and critiques the ways that Twitch, currently the most popular platform for video game live streaming, defines sexual content through its community guidelines, terms of service, and other policy documents. On Twitch, both streamers and viewers are prohibited from posting sexually explicit or suggestive content. This includes images that appear in games as well as on-camera performances. Twitch presents defining sexual content as a matter of common sense and community protection; however, what counts as “sexual content” is far from objective. This analysis reveals that Twitch’s definition of sexual content is in fact vague, subjective, and contradictory and enables discrimination. These policy documents reflect problematic social biases, such as those against women in gaming spaces. Twitch’s policies also reflect anxieties about the relationship between live streaming and webcam-based sex work. This article challenges the sexist cultural logics that shape these policy documents and, by extension, Twitch’s platform politics.
Banet-WeiserS (2012) Authentic: The Politics of Ambivalence in a Brand Culture. New York: NYU Press.
3.
CondisM (2018) Gaming Masculinity: Trolls, Fake Geeks and the Gendered Battle for Online Culture. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press.
4.
ConsalvoM (2007) Cheating: Gaining Advantage in Videogames. Cambridge: MIT Press.
5.
ConsalvoM (2012) Confronting toxic gamer culture: A challenge for feminist game studies scholars. Ada: Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology1: no page numbers.
6.
ConsalvoM (2018) Kaceytron and transgressive play on Twitch.tv. In: JorgensenKKarlsenF (eds) Transgression in Games and Play. Cambridge: MIT Press.
7.
ConsalvoMPaulC (2019) Real Games: What’s Legitimate and What’s Not in Contemporary Videogames. Cambridge: MIT Press.
8.
CullenALLRubergB (2019) Necklines and “naughty bits”: constructing and regulating bodies in live streaming community guidelines. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on the foundations of digital games (FDG’19), San Luis Obispo, CA, 26–30 August, 8 pages. New York: ACM.
FronJFullertonTMorieJF, et al. (2009) The hegemony of play. In: Proceedings, digra: situated play, Tokyo, 24–27 September.
11.
GillespieT (2010) The politics of “platforms.”New Media & Society12(3): 347–364.
12.
GillespieT (2018) Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. Hartford, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
GrantMG (2014) Playing the Whore: The Work of Sex Work. London: Verso.
14.
GrayKL (2017) “They’re just too urban”: Black gamers streaming on Twitch. In: DanielsJGregoryKCottomTM (eds) Digital Sociologies. Chicago, IL: Policy Press, pp. 355–386.
15.
GrayKLLeonardDJ (eds) (2018) Woke Gaming: Digital Challenges to Oppression and Social Justice. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
HamiltonWAGarretsonOKerneA (2014) Streaming on Twitch: Fostering participatory communities of play within live mixed media. In: CHI’14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2556288.2557048
19.
HasinoffAA (2015) Sexting Panic: Rethinking Criminalization, Privacy, and Consent. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
HuntL (1993) The Invention of Pornography, 1500–1800: Obscenity and the Origins of Modernity. New York: Zone Books.
22.
JohnsonMR (2018) Inclusion and exclusion in the digital economy: Disability and mental health as a live streamer on Twitch.tv. Information, Communication, & Society22(4): 506–520.
23.
JonesA (2016) “I get paid to have orgasms”: Adult webcam models negotiation of pleasure and danger. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society421: 227–256.
MorrowWFahmyCFradellaHF (2016) Obscenity and pornography. In: FradellaHSumnerJM (eds) Sex, Sexuality, Law and (In)justice. New York: Routledge, pp. 256–293.
26.
NakandalaSCiampagliaGLSuNM, et al. (2016) Gendered conversation in a social game-streaming platform. Arxiv:1611.06459. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.06459
27.
NobleS (2018) Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.
28.
PaulC (2018) The Toxic Meritocracy of Video Games: Why Gaming Culture Is the Worst. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
29.
PerezS (2018) Twitch now has 27k+ partners and 150k+ affiliates making money from their videos. Tech Crunch, 6February.
30.
RobertsS (2019) Behind the Screen: Content Moderation in the Shadows of Social Media. Hartford, CT: Yale University Press.
31.
RomanoA (2018) A new law intended to curb sex trafficking threatens the future of the internet as we know it. The Verge, 18April.
RubergBCullenABrewsterK (2019) Nothing but a “titty streamer”: Legitimacy, labor, and the debate over women’s breasts in video game live streaming. Critical Studies in Media Communication36(5): 466–481.
34.
SenftTM (2008) Camgirls: Celebrity and Community in the Age of Social Networks. New York: Peter Lang.
35.
TaylorTL (2018) Watch Me Play: Twitch and the Rise of Game Live Streaming. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
WoodcockJJohnsonM (2019) The affective labor and performance of live streaming on Twitch.tv. Television & New Media20(8): 813–823. DOI: 10.1177/1527476419851077.
46.
ZhangGHjorthL (2019) Live-streaming, games, and politics of gender performance: The case of Nuzhubo in China. Convergence25(5-6): 807–825. DOI: 10.1177/1354856517738160.
