This study is the first to scrutinize the psychological effects of online astroturfing in the context of Russia’s digitally enabled foreign propaganda. Online astroturfing is a communicative strategy that uses websites, “sock puppets,” or social bots to create the false impression that a particular opinion has widespread public support. We exposed N = 2353 subjects to pro-Russian astroturfing comments and tested: (1) their effects on political opinions and opinion certainty and (2) the efficiency of three inoculation strategies to prevent these effects. All effects were investigated across three issues and from a short- and long-term perspective. Results show that astroturfing comments can indeed alter recipients’ opinions, and increase uncertainty, even when subjects are inoculated before exposure. We found exclusively short-term effects of only one inoculation strategy (refutational-same). As these findings imply, preemptive media literacy campaigns should deploy (1) continuous rather than one-time efforts and (2) issue specific rather than abstract inoculation messages.
BanasJAMillerG (2013) Inducing resistance to conspiracy theory propaganda: testing inoculation and metainoculation strategies. Human Communication Research39(2): 184–207.
2.
BanasJARainsSA (2010) A meta-analysis of research on inoculation theory. Communication Monographs77(3): 281–311.
3.
BennettWLLivingstonS (2018) The disinformation order: disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication33(2): 122–139.
4.
BessiAFerraraE (2016) Social bots distort the 2016 US presidential election online discussion. First Monday21(11). Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2982233
ChoCHMartensMLKimH, et al. (2011) Astroturfing global warming: it isn’t always greener on the other side of the fence. Journal of Business Ethics104(4): 571–587.
7.
ComptonJA (2013) Inoculation theory. In: DillardJShenL (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 1–20.
8.
ComptonJAPfauM (2004) Use of inoculation to foster resistance to credit card marketing targeting college students. Journal of Applied Communication Research32(4): 343–364.
9.
ComptonJAPfauM (2005) Inoculation theory of resistance to influence at maturity: recent progress in theory development and application and suggestions for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association29(1): 97–146.
10.
CookJLewandowskySEckerUKH (2017) Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PLoS ONE12(5): e0175799.
11.
DaschmannG (2000) Vox pop & vox polls: the impact of poll results and voter statements in the media on the perception of a climate of opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research12(2): 160–181.
12.
DomkeDShahDVWackmanDB (1998) Media priming effects: accessibility, association, and activation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research10(1): 51–74.
13.
European Commission (2018) A Multi-Dimensional Approach to Disinformation: Report of the Independent High Level Group on Fake News and Online Disinformation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
FerraraE (2017) Disinformation and social bot operations in the run up to the 2017 French presidential election. First Monday22(8): 1–30.
16.
GrossSRHoltzRMillerN (1995) Attitude certainty. In: PettyREKrosnickJA (eds) Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. 4th ed.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 215–245.
17.
HayesAF (2005) Statistical Methods for Communication Science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
HovlandCIJanisIKelleyHH (1953) Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press.
19.
InskoCA (1967) Theories of Attitude Change. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
20.
KangJKimHChuH, et al. (2016) In distrust of merits: the negative effects of astroturfs on people’s prosocial behaviors. International Journal of Advertising35(1): 135–148.
21.
KellerFBSchochDStierS, et al. (2019) Political astroturfing on Twitter: how to coordinate a disinformation campaign. Political Communication63(2): 1–25.
22.
KingGPanJRobertsME (2017) How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for strategic distraction, not engaged argument. American Political Science Review111(3): 484–501.
23.
KovicMRauchfleischASeleM, et al. (2018) Digital astroturfing in politics: definition, typology, and countermeasures. Studies in Communication Sciences18(1): 69–85.
24.
LefevereJDe SwertKWalgraveS (2012) Effects of popular exemplars in television news. Communication Research39(1): 103–119.
McGuireWJ (1964) Inducing resistance to persuasion: some contemporary approaches. In: BerkowitzL (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 1st ed. New York: Academic Press, pp. 191–229.
27.
McNuttJBolandK (2007) Astroturf, technology and the future of community mobilization: implications for nonprofit theory. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare34(3): 165–178.
PettyRECacioppoJT (1984) The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology46(1): 69–81.
30.
PfauMBurgoonM (1988) Inoculation in political campaign communication. Human Communication Research15(1): 91–111.
31.
PfauMComptonJAParkerKA, et al. (2004) The traditional explanation for resistance versus attitude accessibility. Human Communication Research30(3): 329–360.
32.
PfauMHaighMMSimsJ, et al. (2007) The influence of corporate front-group stealth campaigns. Communication Research34(1): 73–99.
33.
PfauMTusingJKKoernerAF, et al. (1997) Enriching the inoculation construct: the role of critical components in the process of resistance. Human Communication Research24(2): 187–215.
34.
RuckDJRiceNMBoryczJ, et al. (2019) Internet Research Agency Twitter activity predicted 2016 U.S. election polls. First Monday24(7). Available at: https://firstmonday.org/article/view/10107/8049
35.
SmithSMFabrigarLRMacDougallBL, et al. (2008) The role of amount, cognitive elaboration, and structural consistency of attitude-relevant knowledge in the formation of attitude certainty. European Journal of Social Psychology38(2): 280–295.
36.
TaylorSEThompsonSC (1982) Stalking the elusive “vividness” effect. Psychological Review89(2): 155–181.
37.
TormalaZLPettyRE (2002) What doesn’t kill me makes me stronger: the effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology83(6): 1298–1313.
38.
TormalaZLPettyREBriñolP (2002) Ease of retrieval effects in persuasion: a self-validation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin28(12): 1700–1712.
39.
Van der LindenSMaibachECookJ, et al. (2017) Inoculating against misinformation. Science358(6367): 1141–1142.
40.
VisserPSMirabileRR (2004) Attitudes in the social context: the impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology87(6): 779–795.
41.
Van HerpenMH (2015) Putin’s Propaganda Machine: Soft Power and Russian Foreign Policy. Lanham, Maryland, USA: Rowman & Littlefield.
42.
Von SikorskiC (2016) The effects of reader comments on the perception of personalized scandals: exploring the roles of comment valence and commenters’ social status. International Journal of Communication10: 4480–4501.
WoolleySCGuilbeaultDR (2017) Computational propaganda in the United States of America: manufactoring consensus online. Working Paper No. 2017.5. Oxford: University of Oxford.
45.
ZelenkauskaiteABalducciniM (2017) “Information warfare” and online news commenting: analyzing forces of social influence through location-based commenting user typology. Social Media + Society3(3): 1–13.
46.
ZerbackTFawziN (2017) Can online exemplars trigger a spiral of silence? Examining the effects of exemplar opinions on perceptions of public opinion and speaking out. New Media & Society19(7): 1034–1051.
47.
ZerbackTPeterC (2018) Exemplar effects on public opinion perception and attitudes: the moderating role of exemplar involvement. Human Communication Research44(2): 176–196.
48.
ZhangJCarpenterDKoM (2013) Online astroturfing: a theoretical perspective. In: Proceedings of the 19th Americas conference on information systems, Chicago, IL, 15–17 August.
49.
ZillmannD (1999) Exemplification theory: judging the whole by some of its parts. Media Psychology1(1): 69–94.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
