‘Open source has won and lost the war’: Legitimising commercial

Abstract

Information technology (IT) firms are paying developers in Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) projects, leading to the emergence of hybrid forms of work. In order to understand how the firm–project hybridisation process occurs, we present the results of an online survey of participants in the Debian project, as well as interviews with Debian Developers. We find that the intermingling of the commercial logic of the firm and the communal logic of the project requires rhetorical legitimation. We analyse the discourses used to legitimise firm–project cooperation as well as the organisational mechanisms which facilitate this cooperation. A first phase of legitimation, based on firm adoption of open licenses and developer self-fulfilment, aims to erase the commercial/communal divide. A second more recent phase seeks to professionalise work relations inside the project and, in doing so, challenges the social order which restricts participation in FOSS. Ultimately, hybridisation raises the question of the fair distribution of the profits firms derive from FOSS.

Keywords

Free software hybrid organisations open source social change work

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ashe Dryden (2013) The ethics of unpaid labor and the OSS community, 13 November. Available at: http://www.ashedryden.com/blog/the-ethics-of-unpaid-labor-and-the-oss-community

Auray

(2007) Le modèle souverainiste des communautés en ligne: Impératif participatif et désacralisation du vote. Hermès 47(1): 135–144.

Battilana

Dorado

(2010) Building sustainable hybrid organizations: the case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal 53(6): 1419–1440.

Benkler

(2006) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Benkler

(2013) Practical anarchism: peer mutualism, market power, and the fallible State. Politics & Society 41(2): 213–251.

Bezroukov

(1999) A second look at the Cathedral and the Bazaar. First Monday 4(12).

Bonaccorsi

Rossi

(2004) Altruistic individuals, selfish firms? The structure of motivation in open source software. First Monday 9(1).

Bonaccorsi

Giannangeli

Rossi

(2006) Entry strategies under competing standards: hybrid business models in the open source software industry. Management Science 52: 1085–1098.

Brabham

(2013) Crowdsourcing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

10.

Bridgewater

(2013) International space station adopts Debian Linux, drops windows & red hat into airlock. ComputerWeekly.com. Available at: https://www.computerweekly.com/blog/Open-Source-Insider/International-Space-Station-adopts-Debian-Linux-drops-Windows-Red-Hat-into-airlock

11.

Broca

(2013) Utopie du logiciel libre. Du bricolage technologique à la réinvention Sociale. Neuvy-en-Champagne: Le Passager Clandestin.

12.

Broca

(2018) Du modèle du logiciel libre au modèle productif des communs. Les licences pair à pair contre le free software? Paris: Centre d’études sur les médias, les technologies et l’internationalisation (CEMTI), Université Paris 8.

13.

Coleman

(2005) Three ethical moments in Debian. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=805287

14.

Coleman

(2012) Coding Freedom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

15.

Creed

WED

Scully

Austin

(2002) The tailoring of legitimating accounts and the social construction of identity. Organization Science 13(5): 475–496.

16.

Dahlander

Magnusson

(2008) How do firms make use of open source communities? Long Range Planning 41: 629–649.

17.

David

Waterman

Arora

(2003) The Free/Libre/Open Source Software Survey for 2003. Stanford University. Available at: http://www-siepr.stanford.edu/programs/opensoftware_david/David-Waterman-Arora(2003)_abs.html

18.

Debian Contributors List (2017). Available at: https://contributors.debian.org/

19.

Debian (2006) General resolution: re-affirm support to the Debian project leader. Available at: https://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_006 (accessed 12 March 2019).

20.

Debian-Project (2019) Realizing good ideas with Debian money. Debian-Project, 29 May–30 June. Available at: https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2019/05/threads.html

21.

Demil

Lecocq

Warnier

(2013) The capabilities of bazaar governance: investigating the advantages of business models based on open communities. The Business Model Community Working Paper Series, 2013–2011. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/be26/13b53b6a3653f4f085eefc483b7d2ebb37d7.pdf?_ga=2.251970123.354878720.1580795990-1737197778.1561626250

22.

Eghbal

(2016) Roads and Bridges: The Unseen Labor behind Our Digital Infrastructure. New York: Ford Foundation.

23.

Fereday

Muir-Cochrane

(2006) Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5(1): 80–92.

24.

Friedland

Alford

(1991) Bringing society back in: symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In: Powell

DiMaggio

(eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 232–267.

25.

Gonzalez-Barahona

Robles

(2013) Trends in free, libre, open source software communities: from volunteers to companies. Information Technology 55(5): 179–180.

26.

Hansson

(2013) The perils of mixing open source and money, 12 November. Available at: https://dhh.dk/2013/the-perils-of-mixing-open-source-and-money.html

27.

Haruvy

Prasad

Sethi

(2003) Harvesting altruism in open-source software development. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 118: 381–416.

28.

Huws

(2013) The underpinnings of class in the digital age: living, labour and value. Socialist Register 50: 80–107.

29.

Krishnamurthy

Tripathi

(2014) Acceptance of monetary rewards in open source software development. Research Policy 43(4): 632–644.

30.

Kuechler

Gilbertson

Jensen

(2012) Gender differences in early Free and Open Source Software joining process. In: Hammouda

Lundell

Mikkonen

, et al. (eds) Open Source Systems: Long-Term Sustainability (OSS 2012. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology), vol. 378. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, pp.78–93.

31.

Lerner

Tirole

(2002) Some simple economics of open source. The Journal of Industrial Economics 50: 197–234.

32.

Linux Kernel Patch Statistic (2019). Available at: http://www.remword.com/kps_result/

33.

Mansell

Berdou

(2010) Political economy, the internet and FL/OSS development. In: Hunsinger

Allen

Klastrup

(eds) International Handbook of Internet Research. Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 341–362.

34.

Maurel

(2019) Common labour rights and right to work in the commons. Journal of Peer Production 13. Available at: http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-13-open/news-from-nowhere/common-labour-rights-and-right-to-work-in-the-commons/

35.

Michlmayr

(2019) Platform. Available at: https://www.debian.org/vote/2019/platforms/tbm

36.

Moglen

(1999) Anarchism triumphant: free software and the death of copyright. First Monday. Available at: https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/684/594

37.

Nafus

(2012) ‘Patches don’t have gender’: what is not open in Open Source software. New Media & Society 14(4): 669–683.

38.

Nagle

(2018) Learning by contributing: gaining competitive advantage through contribution to crowdsourced public goods. Organization Science 29(4): 569–587.

39.

O’Mahony

Bechky

(2008) Boundary organizations: enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Administrative Science Quarterly 53: 422–459.

40.

O’Neil

(2009) Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes. London: Pluto Press.

41.

O’Neil

(2014) Hacking Weber: legitimacy, critique and trust in peer production. Information, Communication & Society 17(7): 872–888.

42.

O’Neil

(2015) Labour out of control: the political economy of capitalist and ethical organisations. Organization Studies 36(12): 1627–1647.

43.

Pache

Santos

(2010) Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal 56(4): 972–1001.

44.

PD (2013) Re: Google contacting (harassing?) new DDs. Debian-Project. Available at: https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2013/12/msg00056.html

45.

Pennington

(2019) Open source has a working-for-free problem. Available at: https://blog.tidelift.com/open-source-has-a-working-for-free-problem

46.

Raymond

(1999) The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Open Source and Linux by an Accidental Revolutionary. Sebastopol, FL: O’Reilly.

47.

Riehle

Riemer

Kolassa

, et al. (2014) Paid vs. volunteer work in Open Source. In: 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS), Washington, DC, 6–9 January, pp. 3286–3295. New York: IEEE.

48.

Ris (2006) Debian + Dunc-Tank.org = dissent. Linux Weekly News. Available at: https://lwn.net/Articles/201488/

49.

Robles

Duenas

Gonzalez-Barahona

(2007) Corporate involvement of Libre Software: study of presence in Debian code over time. In: Feller

Fitzgerald

Scacchi

, et al. (eds) Open Source Development, Adoption and Innovation. Boston, MA: Springer, pp. 121–132.

50.

Söderberg

O’Neil

(2014) Introduction. In: Söderberg

Maxigas (Eds) Book of Peer Production. Göteborg: NSU Press, pp. 2–3.

51.

Stallman

(1985) The GNU manifesto. Available at: https://www.gnu.org/gnu/manifesto.en.html

52.

Stallman

(2002) Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman. Boston, MA: GNU Press.

53.

Stallman

(2018) Private conversation with Rob Lucas. Posted on the Nettime mailing list by permission. Available at: https://nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-1811/msg00049.html

54.

Suddaby

Greenwood

(2005) Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly 50(1): 35–67.

55.

Surowiecki

(2005) The Wisdom of Crowds. New York: Anchor Books.

56.

Tapscott

Williams

(2006) Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. London: Penguin Books.

57.

Thornton

Ocasio

Lounsbury

(2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective. A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

58.

Vaughan-Nichols

(2019) The battle between real open source vs. faux open source heats up. ZDNet, 20 February. Available at: https://www.zdnet.com/article/the-battle-between-real-open-source-vs-faux-open-source-heats-up/

‘Open source has won and lost the war’: Legitimising commercial–communal hybridisation in a FOSS project

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References