Taking a screenshot, an exact duplication of the content on the screen of a device, is a taken-for-granted practice. Through an analysis of ethnographic data, this article considers the everyday use of screenshots among teenagers. I examine the taking, possession, and circulation of screenshots among teens to ask: What is screenshot? What function do they have? and How are screenshots significant beyond teens? The article draws attention to the ‘social life’ that screenshots have beyond their duplicative function. Screenshots were framed by teens as an everyday aspect of digital communication that are integral to negotiating hierarchies of friendship, power, and for establishing peer trust. This article takes screenshots seriously in their own right, drawing on existing insights from feminist media studies to demonstrate how the visibility afforded by screenshots is gendered in practice. This article explores screenshots as powerful communicative tools and as a socio-cultural phenomenon worthy of further interrogation.
AhmedS (2004) The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
2.
AlcoffLPotterE (1993) Feminist Epistemologies. New York and London: Routledge.
3.
BaradK (2003) Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society28(3): 801–831.
4.
BaymNK (2002) Interpersonal life online. In: LivingstoneSLievrouwL (eds) The Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs. London: SAGE, pp. 62–76.
5.
BaymNK (2015) Personal Connections in the Digital Age. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Polity Press.
6.
BerrimanLThomsonR (2015) Spectacles of intimacy? Mapping the moral landscape of teenage social media. Journal of Youth Studies18(5): 583–597.
7.
BordoS (1993) Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. London: University of California Press.
8.
boydd (2014) It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
ButlerJ (2004) Bodies and power revisited. In: TaylorDVintgesK (eds) Feminism and the Final Foucault. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 182–194.
10.
ChandlerDMundayR (2016) A Dictionary of Social Media. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
DobsonAS (2015) Postfeminist Digital Cultures: Femininity, Social Media, and Self-Representation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
DubrofskyRMagnetSA (eds) (2015) Feminist Surveillance Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
13.
DuffyBChanNK (2018) ‘You never really know who’s looking’: imagined surveillance across social media platforms. New Media & Society21(1): 119–138.
14.
EliasASGillR (2018) Beauty surveillance: the digital self-monitoring cultures of neoliberalism. European Journal of Cultural Studies21(1): 1–19.
FoucaultM (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Allen Lane.
17.
GillR (2007) Postfeminist media culture: elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies10(2): 147–166.
18.
GillR (2017) The affective, cultural and psychic life of postfeminism: a postfeminist sensibility 10 years on. European Journal of Cultural Studies20(6): 606–626.
19.
HandysideSRingroseJ (2017) Snapchat memory and youth digital sexual cultures: mediated temporality, duration and affect. Journal of Gender Studies26(3): 347–360.
20.
HartleyJBurgessJBrunsA (eds) (2015) A Companion to New Media Dynamics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
21.
HarveyLRingroseJGillR (2013) Swagger, ratings and masculinity: theorising the circulation of social and cultural value in teenage boys’ digital peer networks. Sociological Research Online18(4): 1–21.
22.
HillisKPaasonenSPetitM (eds) (2015) Networked Affect. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
HineC (2015) Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
24.
HooksB (2015) Yearning Race, Gender, and Cultural Politics. 2nd ed.New York: Routledge.
25.
LightBBurgessJDuguayS (2016) The walkthrough method: an approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society20(3): 881–900.
26.
LivingstoneSM (2008) Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and selfexpression. New Media & Society10(3): 393–411.
27.
LivingstoneSMSefton-GreenJ (2016) The Class: Living and Learning in the Digital Age. New York: New York University Press.
28.
LuptonDSeymourW (2003) I am normal on the net: disability, computerised communication technologies and the embodied self. In: CouplandJGwynR (eds) Discourse, the Body and Identity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 246–265.
29.
McNeilM (2007) Feminist Cultural Studies of Science and Technology. Oxon: Routledge.
30.
McRobbieA (2015) Notes on the perfect. Australian Feminist Studies30(83): 3–20.
31.
MarkhamA (2017) Ethnography in the digital era: from fields to flow, descriptions to interventions. In: DenzinNLincolnY (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. 5th ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 650–668.
32.
MarwickAEboydd (2011) To see and be seen: celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence17(2): 139–158.
33.
MarwickAEboydd (2014) ‘It’s just drama’: teen perspectives on conflict and aggression in a networked era. Journal of Youth Studies17(9): 1187–1204.
34.
MillerD (2015) Photography in the age of Snapchat. Anthropology & Photography1(1): 1–17.
35.
PapacharissiZEastonE (2015) In the habitus of the new: structure, agency and the social media habitus. In: HartleyJBurgessJBrunsA (eds) A Companion to New Media Dynamics. Winchester: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 171–184.
36.
PenneyR (2016) The rhetoric of the mistake in adult narratives of youth sexuality: the case of Amanda Todd. Feminist Media Studies16(4): 710–725.
37.
PostillJPinkS (2012) Social media ethnography: the digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia145(1): 123–134.
38.
RingroseJHarveyLGillR, et al. (2013) Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory14(3): 305–323.
39.
SkeggsB (1997) Formations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable. London: SAGE.
40.
SkeggsBThumimNWoodH (2008) ‘Oh goodness, I am watching reality TV’: how methods make class in audience research. European Journal of Cultural Studies10(3): 5–24.
41.
SkovholtKSvennevigJ (2006) Email copies in workplace interaction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12(1): 42–65.
42.
TaskerYNegraD (2007) Interrogating postfeminism: Gender and the politics of popular culture. Durham: Duke University Press.
43.
ThomsonRBerrimanLBraggS (2018) Researching Everyday Childhoods: Time, Technology and Documentation in a Digital Age. London: Bloomsbury.
44.
TylerI (2008) ‘Chav Mum Chav Scum’: class disgust in contemporary Britain. Feminist Media Studies8(1): 17–34.
45.
Van HouseN (2011) Feminist HCI meets Facebook: performativity and social networking sites. Interacting With Computers23: 422–429.
46.
VickeryJ (2018) Worried About the Wrong Things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
WarfieldKCambreCAbidinC (2016) Introduction to the Social Media + Society special issue on selfies: me-diated inter-faces. Social Media + Society2(2). DOI: 10.1177/2056305116641344.
48.
WinchA (2013) Girlfriends and Postfeminist Sisterhood. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
49.
ZoonenLV (1994) Feminist Media Studies. London: SAGE.
