This article discusses policy debates in the United Kingdom and Australia concerning the regulation of online pornographic content as it relates to children. Through a thematic analysis of qualitative interviews with key stakeholders at the negotiation table, we find that rather than positivist notions of the ‘developing’ and ‘vulnerable’ child dominating policy discourse, post-modern representations of the ‘savvy’ and ‘agentic’ child have come to dominate policy culture and outcomes. In this scenario, the regulatory role of states in providing media protection is diminished, while neoliberal forms of governance that emphasise the responsibility of individuals, including parents and children, have come to dominate the emerging policy landscape.
AttwoodFSmithCBarkerM (2018) ‘I’m just curious and still exploring myself’: young people and pornography. New Media & Society20(10): 3738–3759.
2.
BaleC (2011) Raunch or romance? Framing and interpreting the relationship between sexualized culture and young people’s sexual health. Sex Education11(3): 303–313.
3.
BeckU (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: SAGE.
4.
BeckerHS (1963) Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. London: The Free Press.
5.
BognerALittigBMenzW (2009) Introduction: expert interviews – an introduction to a new methodological debate. In: BognerALittigBMenzW (eds) Interviewing Experts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–16.
6.
boydd (2010) Social network sites as networked publics: affordances, dynamics, and implications. In: PapacharissiZ (ed.) A Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge, pp. 39–59.
7.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
8.
BridgesAJ (2010) Methodological considerations in mapping pornography content. In: BoyleK (ed.) Everyday Pornography. London: Routledge, pp. 34–48.
9.
BuckinghamDChronakiD (2014) Saving the children? Pornography, childhood and the Internet. In: WaggSPilcherJ (eds) Thatcher’s Grandchildren? Politics and Childhood in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 301–317.
10.
ByrneJBurtonP (2017) Children as Internet users: how can evidence better inform policy debate?Journal of Cyber Policy2(1): 39–52.
11.
ByrneJKardefelt-WintherDLivingstoneS, et al. (2016) Global Kids Online Research Synthesis, 2015–2016. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research – Innocenti and London School of Economics and Political Science.
EganRDHawkesGL (2010) Theorizing the Sexual Child in Modernity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
FloodM (2009) The harms of pornography exposure among children and young people. Child Abuse Review18(6): 384–400.
15.
FloodMHamiltonC (2003) Regulating youth access to pornography. Discussion paper no. 53, March. Canberra, ACT, Australia: The Australia Institute.
16.
FoucaultM (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon.
17.
HasebrinkULivingstoneSHaddonL, et al. (2009) Comparing Children’s Online Opportunities and Risks across Europe: Cross-National Comparisons for EU Kids Online. London: EU Kids Online, LSE.
18.
JamesAProutA (1997) Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood : Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood. London and Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
19.
LivingstoneS (2009) Children and the Internet: Great Expectations, Challenging Realities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
LivingstoneSSmithPK (2014) Annual research review: harms experienced by child users of online and mobile technologies: the nature, prevalence and management of sexual and aggressive risks in the digital age. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry55(6): 635–654.
22.
LivingstoneSCarrJByrneJ (2015) One in Three: Internet Governance and Children’s Rights. London: Centre for International Governance Innovation and Chatham House.
23.
LivingstoneSHaddonLGörzigA, et al. (2011) Risks and Safety on the Internet: The Perspective of European Children: Full Findings and Policy Implications From the EU Kids Online Survey of 9–16 Year Olds and Their Parents in 25 Countries. London: EU Kids Online.
24.
LuntPLivingstoneS (2012) Media Regulation: Governance and the Interests of Citizens and Consumers. London: SAGE.
25.
McChesneyRW (2013) Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism Is Turning the Internet against Democracy. New York: The New Press.
MascheroniGÓlafssonK (2014) Net Children Go Mobile Risks and Opportunities. 2nd ed.Milan: Educatt.
28.
MulhollandM (2015) Is there a new normal? Young people negotiate pornification. In: RenoldERingroseJEganRD (eds) Children, Sexuality and Sexualization. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 321–336.
29.
NashVAdlerJRHorvathMAH, et al. (2015) Identifying the routes by which children view pornography online: implications for future policy-makers seeking to limit viewing. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/65450
30.
Ofcom (2014) Ofcom Report on Internet Safety Measures: Strategies of Parental Protection for Children Online. London: Ofcom.
31.
Office of the Children’s eSafety Commissioner (2016) Part 2 Office of the Children’s eSafety Commissioner Annual Report 2015–16. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
32.
OswellD (1998) The place of ‘childhood’ in Internet content regulation: a case study of policy in the UK. International Journal of Cultural Studies1(2): 271–291.
33.
OwensEWBehunRManningJ, et al. (2012) The impact of Internet pornography on adolescents: a review of the research. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity19: 99–122.
34.
PattonMQ (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
35.
PeterJValkenburgPM (2009) Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit internet material and notions of women as sex objects: assessing causality and underlying processes. Journal of Communication59: 407–433.
36.
PhippenA (2012) Sexting: An Exploration of Practices, Attitudes and Influences. London: NSPCC/UK Safer Internet Centre.
37.
PiagetJ (1964) The Early Growth of Logic in the Child. New York: Harper.
38.
PrenskyM (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon9(5): 1–6.
39.
PrzybylskiAKNashV (2018) Internet filtering and adolescent exposure to online sexual material. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour, and Social Networking21(7): 405–410.
40.
PrzybylskiAKMishkinAShotboltV, et al. (2014) A Shared Responsibility: Building Children’s Online Resilience. London: Parent Zone.
41.
RobinsonKH (2013) Innocence, Knowledge, and the Construction of Childhood: The Contradictory Nature of Sexuality and Censorship in Children’s Contemporary Lives. Abingdon; Oxon: Routledge.
42.
StaksrudE (2013) Children in the Online World: Risk Regulation, Rights. Burlington, VT; Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
43.
StraussACorbinJ (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
44.
ThirdACollierAForrest-LawrenceP (2014) Addressing Cyber Safety Challenge: From Risk to Resilience. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Telstra Corporation.
45.
TisdallKMPunchS (2012) Not so ‘new’? Looking critically at childhood studies. Children’s Geographies10(3): 249–264.
46.
TsalikiLChronakiDÓlafssonK (2014) Experiences with Sexual Content: What We Know from the Research So Far. London: EU Kids Online, LSE.
